Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.project > #13122
| Path | csiph.com!aioe.org!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod |
|---|---|
| From | "Roberto A. Foglietta" <roberto.foglietta@gmail.com> |
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.project |
| Subject | Re: Fortunes-off - do we need this as a package for Bookworm? |
| Date | Wed, 14 Dec 2022 22:40:01 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <FCHDP-aGMs-3@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <Ftz2N-4Rcp-33@gated-at.bofh.it> <FtCWJ-4Tyz-31@gated-at.bofh.it> <FtElP-4UDy-13@gated-at.bofh.it> <FtFUB-4Vqx-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <FtQdj-52lS-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <FtZqi-58AL-19@gated-at.bofh.it> <Fu02Z-594w-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <Fucnv-5hbl-21@gated-at.bofh.it> <FCmpI-atuD-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <FCvW1-azKa-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <FCE3f-aEvH-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| X-Mailbox-Line | From debian-project-request@lists.debian.org Wed Dec 14 21:31:00 2022 |
| Old-Return-Path | <roberto.foglietta@gmail.com> |
| X-Amavis-Spam-Status | No, score=-11.3 required=4.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,FREEMAIL_FROM,LDOSUBSCRIBER,LDO_WHITELIST, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 |
| X-Amavis-Spam-Status | No, score=-7.199 tagged_above=-10000 required=5.3 tests=[BAYES_00=-2, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, LDO_WHITELIST=-5, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no |
| X-Policyd-Weight | using cached result; rate: -5.5 |
| X-Gm-Message-State | ANoB5plb6iAzhcB4u8qUytvkbjBEyhtx0fb4sJUGnCkbwQbQRFg6Vb4J 4rsuNU9YmU4XuLxzTYiF3eY6OLB0EQK0cHCs0Q== |
| X-Google-SMTP-Source | AA0mqf6wfHCJKdqFGn6dIKR9tg2nLDUKNSqiVbFhTHvLsImiYXA5+r/QJR4xIjUjfhWj4fOaCNPRdtnsC2SZXoWrzEc= |
| X-Received | by 2002:ac8:4696:0:b0:3a7:e50e:3fec with SMTP id g22-20020ac84696000000b003a7e50e3fecmr14279076qto.590.1671050424865; Wed, 14 Dec 2022 12:40:24 -0800 (PST) |
| MIME-Version | 1.0 |
| Content-Type | text/plain; charset="UTF-8" |
| Moderated | yes |
| X-Mailing-List | <debian-project@lists.debian.org> archive/latest/31042 |
| List-ID | <debian-project.lists.debian.org> |
| List-URL | <https://lists.debian.org/debian-project/> |
| List-Archive | https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/CAJGKYO6aeuQQY+fr0WpWoRFRK9_Maak3yM2QxmBtL78D88mskA@mail.gmail.com |
| Approved | robomod@news.nic.it |
| Lines | 22 |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
| Sender | robomod@news.nic.it |
| X-Original-Cc | "Andrew M.A. Cater" <amacater@einval.com>, debian-project@lists.debian.org |
| X-Original-Date | Wed, 14 Dec 2022 21:39:46 +0100 |
| X-Original-Message-ID | <CAJGKYO6aeuQQY+fr0WpWoRFRK9_Maak3yM2QxmBtL78D88mskA@mail.gmail.com> |
| X-Original-References | <20221119163156.u4g4quuh2myiph24@frifot> <Y3k+8gzdfgiwXKso@connexer.com> <20221119220750.adjylf2tvxy3uypw@frifot> <20221119232229.kcucgfxclb5ocfyh@illithid> <87r0xxzz21.fsf@jaatynyt> <20221120182859.k7ehjxuzt4zxpdal@illithid> <CAJGKYO4DEPXGDN1ig1VDK19nwmTeYYR6TyOB3f0UmU+PziwA0w@mail.gmail.com> <87leo4k3pt.fsf@nanjata> <Y5j92tu0H8NORcTg@pc220518.home.grep.be> <Y5l8YeY85yBhw9wp@einval.com> <Y5oJ1HXRMgaX5Z6I@iiec.unam.mx> |
| Xref | csiph.com linux.debian.project:13122 |
Show key headers only | View raw
On Wed, 14 Dec 2022 at 18:40, Gunnar Wolf <gwolf@debian.org> wrote: > > Andrew M.A. Cater dijo [Wed, Dec 14, 2022 at 07:33:53AM +0000]: > > (...) > > The utility of a separate package depends on how much work it is to > > produce it. That was the renaming bug that jmtd fixed, I think. > > I think removing Hitler/Goebbels quotes from an obscure game is worthwhile: > > it stops any association / any *Debian encourages Nazism* and means that we > > don't have to worry about hosting it anywhere at all. > > Although during this discussion it was shown via several examples (and > not one counterexample TTBOMK) that, while fortunes-off does have > nazi-leaders snippets, it's not something that can be read as > endorsing those views, but just the opposite -- either ridiculing > them, pointing out how flawed the ideas were, or somesuch. > Correct, it is not the data to be evil but how we perceive it. Forgetting the past is not the right way to deal with it but the easiest to repeat the errors. Best, R-
Back to linux.debian.project | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Fortunes-off - do we need this as a package for Bookworm? "Andrew M.A. Cater" <amacater@einval.com> - 2022-11-19 16:10 +0100
Re: Fortunes-off - do we need this as a package for Bookworm? Scott Kitterman <debian@kitterman.com> - 2022-11-19 17:40 +0100
Re: Fortunes-off - do we need this as a package for Bookworm? Dominik George <natureshadow@debian.org> - 2022-11-19 17:40 +0100
Re: Fortunes-off - do we need this as a package for Bookworm? Roberto C. Sánchez <roberto@debian.org> - 2022-11-19 21:50 +0100
Re: Fortunes-off - do we need this as a package for Bookworm? "Andrew M.A. Cater" <amacater@einval.com> - 2022-11-19 22:10 +0100
Re: Fortunes-off - do we need this as a package for Bookworm? Dominik George <natureshadow@debian.org> - 2022-11-19 23:20 +0100
Re: Fortunes-off - do we need this as a package for Bookworm? "G. Branden Robinson" <g.branden.robinson@gmail.com> - 2022-11-20 01:00 +0100
Re: Fortunes-off - do we need this as a package for Bookworm? Pierre-Elliott Bécue <peb@debian.org> - 2022-11-20 12:00 +0100
Re: Fortunes-off - do we need this as a package for Bookworm? Charles Plessy <plessy@debian.org> - 2022-11-20 14:20 +0100
Re: Fortunes-off - do we need this as a package for Bookworm? "G. Branden Robinson" <g.branden.robinson@gmail.com> - 2022-11-20 21:50 +0100
Re: Fortunes-off - do we need this as a package for Bookworm? "Roberto A. Foglietta" <roberto.foglietta@gmail.com> - 2022-11-20 22:30 +0100
Re: Fortunes-off - do we need this as a package for Bookworm? Michael Neuffer <neuffer@neuffer.com> - 2022-11-20 23:00 +0100
Re: Fortunes-off - do we need this as a package for Bookworm? Mattia Rizzolo <mattia@debian.org> - 2022-11-20 23:30 +0100
Re: Fortunes-off - do we need this as a package for Bookworm? Michael Neuffer <neuffer@neuffer.com> - 2022-11-21 00:50 +0100
Re: Fortunes-off - do we need this as a package for Bookworm? Steve McIntyre <steve@einval.com> - 2022-11-21 01:00 +0100
Re: Fortunes-off - do we need this as a package for Bookworm? "Roberto A. Foglietta" <roberto.foglietta@gmail.com> - 2022-11-21 03:20 +0100
Re: Fortunes-off - do we need this as a package for Bookworm? "G. Branden Robinson" <g.branden.robinson@gmail.com> - 2022-11-21 08:10 +0100
Aw: Re: Fortunes-off - do we need this as a package for Bookworm? Steffen Möller <steffen_moeller@gmx.de> - 2022-11-21 16:10 +0100
Re: Fortunes-off - do we need this as a package for Bookworm? "G. Branden Robinson" <g.branden.robinson@gmail.com> - 2022-11-21 03:20 +0100
Re: Fortunes-off - do we need this as a package for Bookworm? <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2022-11-21 08:10 +0100
Re: Fortunes-off - do we need this as a package for Bookworm? Roberto C. Sánchez <roberto@debian.org> - 2022-11-22 04:50 +0100
Re: Fortunes-off - do we need this as a package for Bookworm? Jonathan Dowland <jmtd@debian.org> - 2022-11-21 17:40 +0100
Re: Fortunes-off - do we need this as a package for Bookworm? Sam Hartman <hartmans@debian.org> - 2022-11-21 18:00 +0100
Re: Fortunes-off - do we need this as a package for Bookworm? Hanno 'Rince' Wagner <wagner@debian.org> - 2022-11-21 18:10 +0100
Re: Fortunes-off - do we need this as a package for Bookworm? "G. Branden Robinson" <g.branden.robinson@gmail.com> - 2022-11-21 19:10 +0100
Re: Fortunes-off - do we need this as a package for Bookworm? Diederik de Haas <didi.debian@cknow.org> - 2022-11-21 03:10 +0100
Re: Fortunes-off - do we need this as a package for Bookworm? Tiago Bortoletto Vaz <tiago@debian.org> - 2022-11-21 03:10 +0100
Re: Fortunes-off - do we need this as a package for Bookworm? Pierre-Elliott Bécue <peb@debian.org> - 2022-11-21 11:40 +0100
Re: Fortunes-off - do we need this as a package for Bookworm? Wouter Verhelst <wouter@debian.org> - 2022-12-14 00:00 +0100
Re: Fortunes-off - do we need this as a package for Bookworm? "Andrew M.A. Cater" <amacater@einval.com> - 2022-12-14 10:10 +0100
Re: Fortunes-off - do we need this as a package for Bookworm? Gunnar Wolf <gwolf@debian.org> - 2022-12-14 18:50 +0100
Re: Fortunes-off - do we need this as a package for Bookworm? "Roberto A. Foglietta" <roberto.foglietta@gmail.com> - 2022-12-14 22:40 +0100
Re: Fortunes-off - do we need this as a package for Bookworm? Charles Plessy <plessy@debian.org> - 2022-12-14 23:10 +0100
Re: Fortunes-off - do we need this as a package for Bookworm? "Roberto A. Foglietta" <roberto.foglietta@gmail.com> - 2022-12-14 10:10 +0100
Re: Fortunes-off - do we need this as a package for Bookworm? Steve Langasek <vorlon@debian.org> - 2022-11-21 00:50 +0100
Re: Fortunes-off - do we need this as a package for Bookworm? Sam Hartman <hartmans@debian.org> - 2022-11-21 06:00 +0100
Re: Fortunes-off - do we need this as a package for Bookworm? "G. Branden Robinson" <g.branden.robinson@gmail.com> - 2022-11-21 08:10 +0100
Re: Fortunes-off - do we need this as a package for Bookworm? Sam Hartman <hartmans@suchdamage.org> - 2022-11-21 16:10 +0100
Re: Fortunes-off - do we need this as a package for Bookworm? "G. Branden Robinson" <g.branden.robinson@gmail.com> - 2022-11-21 21:30 +0100
Re: Fortunes-off - do we need this as a package for Bookworm? nick black <dankamongmen@gmail.com> - 2022-11-21 23:00 +0100
Re: Fortunes-off - do we need this as a package for Bookworm? <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2022-11-22 06:50 +0100
Re: Fortunes-off - do we need this as a package for Bookworm? Marco d'Itri <md@Linux.IT> - 2022-12-17 20:20 +0100
Re: Fortunes-off - do we need this as a package for Bookworm? "G. Branden Robinson" <g.branden.robinson@gmail.com> - 2022-12-18 23:20 +0100
Re: Fortunes-off - do we need this as a package for Bookworm? <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2022-12-19 06:30 +0100
Re: Fortunes-off - do we need this as a package for Bookworm? "G. Branden Robinson" <g.branden.robinson@gmail.com> - 2022-12-19 17:40 +0100
Re: Fortunes-off - do we need this as a package for Bookworm? Marco d'Itri <md@Linux.IT> - 2022-12-20 18:00 +0100
Re: Fortunes-off - do we need this as a package for Bookworm? Pierre-Elliott Bécue <peb@debian.org> - 2022-11-21 11:40 +0100
Re: Fortunes-off - do we need this as a package for Bookworm? The Wanderer <wanderer@fastmail.fm> - 2022-11-21 23:10 +0100
Re: Fortunes-off - do we need this as a package for Bookworm? <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2022-11-22 07:00 +0100
Re: Fortunes-off - do we need this as a package for Bookworm? Alexander Reichle-Schmehl <alexander@alphamar.org> - 2022-11-22 10:50 +0100
Re: Fortunes-off - do we need this as a package for Bookworm? Judit Foglszinger <urbec@riseup.net> - 2022-11-20 12:00 +0100
Re: Fortunes-off - do we need this as a package for Bookworm? Ansgar <ansgar@debian.org> - 2022-11-20 12:20 +0100
Re: Fortunes-off - do we need this as a package for Bookworm? David Prévot <david@tilapin.org> - 2022-11-20 15:50 +0100
Re: Removing software because we disagree with its values Sam Hartman <hartmans@debian.org> - 2022-11-20 21:50 +0100
Re: Removing software because we disagree with its values "Andrew M.A. Cater" <amacater@einval.com> - 2022-11-20 22:00 +0100
Re: Removing software because we disagree with its values Sam Hartman <hartmans@debian.org> - 2022-11-20 22:30 +0100
Re: Removing software because we disagree with its values Roberto C. Sánchez <roberto@debian.org> - 2022-11-21 00:00 +0100
Re: Removing software because we disagree with its values Diederik de Haas <didi.debian@cknow.org> - 2022-11-21 03:10 +0100
Re: Removing software because we disagree with its values Roberto C. Sánchez <roberto@debian.org> - 2022-11-20 23:40 +0100
csiph-web