Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.maint.python > #11685 > unrolled thread
| Started by | PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel <frederic-emmanuel.picca@synchrotron-soleil.fr> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2019-08-27 22:00 +0200 |
| Last post | 2019-08-28 07:40 +0200 |
| Articles | 3 — 2 participants |
Back to article view | Back to linux.debian.maint.python
pylint and pylint3 PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel <frederic-emmanuel.picca@synchrotron-soleil.fr> - 2019-08-27 22:00 +0200
Re: pylint and pylint3 Nicholas D Steeves <nsteeves@gmail.com> - 2019-08-28 02:20 +0200
RE:pylint and pylint3 PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel <frederic-emmanuel.picca@synchrotron-soleil.fr> - 2019-08-28 07:40 +0200
| From | PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel <frederic-emmanuel.picca@synchrotron-soleil.fr> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-08-27 22:00 +0200 |
| Subject | pylint and pylint3 |
| Message-ID | <yzPNg-6ki-11@gated-at.bofh.it> |
Hello it seems that the pylint package does not provide pylint3 anymore (since 21h ;) But the spyder package still require pylint3 and pylint when installint spyder or spyder3. this is why the next taurus will FTBFS. So is it something expected and the spyder package should be fixed, or a bug in the pylint package ? Cheers Fred
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Nicholas D Steeves <nsteeves@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-08-28 02:20 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <yzTQR-Fs-3@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #11685 |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw
Hi Fred, On Tue, Aug 27, 2019 at 07:29:06PM +0000, PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel wrote: > Hello it seems that the pylint package does not provide pylint3 anymore (since 21h ;) > But the spyder package still require pylint3 and pylint when installint spyder or spyder3. > this is why the next taurus will FTBFS. > > So is it something expected and the spyder package should be fixed, or a bug in the pylint package ? > > Cheers > > Fred ScottK and I discussed this type of case on #debian-python. The Python 3 variant of the package should begin provide the /usr/bin/foo wrapper script interface when the Python 2 package is dropped. This really ought to be codified somewhere, and I'm not sure that the DPMT wiki page is visible enough or will be consulted by maintainers when dropping the Python 2 variant of their packages. Cheers, Nicholas
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel <frederic-emmanuel.picca@synchrotron-soleil.fr> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-08-28 07:40 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <yzYQx-3Vr-3@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #11686 |
Hello, > The Python 3 variant of the package should begin provide the > /usr/bin/foo wrapper script interface when the Python 2 package is > dropped. > This really ought to be codified somewhere, and I'm not sure that the > DPMT wiki page is visible enough or will be consulted by maintainers > when dropping the Python 2 variant of their packages. Should I understand that this information about the wrapper is available on the DPMT wiki ? Fred
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | linux.debian.maint.python
csiph-web