Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.maint.python > #11647 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Guðjón Guðjónsson <gudjon.i.gudjonsson@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2019-08-24 08:50 +0200 |
| Last post | 2019-08-25 10:10 +0200 |
| Articles | 4 — 2 participants |
Back to article view | Back to linux.debian.maint.python
Python2/Qt4 removal Guðjón Guðjónsson <gudjon.i.gudjonsson@gmail.com> - 2019-08-24 08:50 +0200
Re: Python2/Qt4 removal Scott Kitterman <debian@kitterman.com> - 2019-08-24 09:30 +0200
Re: Python2/Qt4 removal Scott Kitterman <debian@kitterman.com> - 2019-08-25 02:40 +0200
Re: Python2/Qt4 removal Guðjón Guðjónsson <gudjon.i.gudjonsson@gmail.com> - 2019-08-25 10:10 +0200
| From | Guðjón Guðjónsson <gudjon.i.gudjonsson@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-08-24 08:50 +0200 |
| Subject | Python2/Qt4 removal |
| Message-ID | <yyy25-5Pe-3@gated-at.bofh.it> |
Hi list QScintilla Qt4/python2 version has one reverse dependency and it is the tora package that is marked for autoremoval on the 5th of September. Shall I keep support for Qt4/python2 in my upgrade or is it ok to remove it? Regards Gudjon
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Scott Kitterman <debian@kitterman.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-08-24 09:30 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <yyyEO-6i8-9@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #11647 |
On Saturday, August 24, 2019 2:46:04 AM EDT Guðjón Guðjónsson wrote: > Hi list > > QScintilla Qt4/python2 version has one reverse dependency and it is the > tora package that is marked for autoremoval on the 5th of September. > > Shall I keep support for Qt4/python2 in my upgrade or is it ok to remove it? You should wait until it's either upgraded or removed from unstable. It depends directly on the library, not the python binding, so if nothing else is using the python bindings they can be dropped now even if you keep Qt4 support for the moment. I note that the new upstream release of tora supports Qt5, so I would recommend emailing the maintainer (there's already a bug) to ask them to either upgrade the package or file an rm request. Scott K
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Scott Kitterman <debian@kitterman.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-08-25 02:40 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <yyOJz-7Yi-9@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #11649 |
On Saturday, August 24, 2019 3:26:33 AM EDT Scott Kitterman wrote: > On Saturday, August 24, 2019 2:46:04 AM EDT Guðjón Guðjónsson wrote: > > Hi list > > > > QScintilla Qt4/python2 version has one reverse dependency and it is the > > tora package that is marked for autoremoval on the 5th of September. > > > > Shall I keep support for Qt4/python2 in my upgrade or is it ok to remove > > it? > You should wait until it's either upgraded or removed from unstable. It > depends directly on the library, not the python binding, so if nothing else > is using the python bindings they can be dropped now even if you keep Qt4 > support for the moment. > > I note that the new upstream release of tora supports Qt5, so I would > recommend emailing the maintainer (there's already a bug) to ask them to > either upgrade the package or file an rm request. Tora is gone now, but you're not quite there yet. reverse-depends python-qscintilla2 Reverse-Recommends ================== * connectomeviewer See #875494 about this. reverse-depends python-pyqt5.qsci Reverse-Depends =============== * tortoisehg I filed #935660 about this. Scott K
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Guðjón Guðjónsson <gudjon.i.gudjonsson@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-08-25 10:10 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <yyVL3-4dx-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #11653 |
Hi Scott Great, thanks. I will make one upgrade with python2/Qt4 and then start preparing for its removal. Regards Gudjon
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | linux.debian.maint.python
csiph-web