Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.maint.python > #11491 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Ondrej Novy <novy@ondrej.org> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2019-07-18 21:40 +0200 |
| Last post | 2019-07-22 14:20 +0200 |
| Articles | 8 — 7 participants |
Back to article view | Back to linux.debian.maint.python
Use debhelper-compat instead of debian/compat Ondrej Novy <novy@ondrej.org> - 2019-07-18 21:40 +0200
Re: Use debhelper-compat instead of debian/compat Daniele Tricoli <eriol@debian.org> - 2019-07-19 00:20 +0200
Re: Use debhelper-compat instead of debian/compat Craig Small <csmall@debian.org> - 2019-07-19 00:50 +0200
Re: Use debhelper-compat instead of debian/compat Dmitry Shachnev <mitya57@debian.org> - 2019-07-19 10:50 +0200
Re: Use debhelper-compat instead of debian/compat Ondrej Novy <novy@ondrej.org> - 2019-07-19 14:40 +0200
Re: Use debhelper-compat instead of debian/compat Scott Kitterman <debian@kitterman.com> - 2019-07-19 01:40 +0200
Re: Use debhelper-compat instead of debian/compat Andreas Tille <andreas@an3as.eu> - 2019-07-22 13:00 +0200
Re: Use debhelper-compat instead of debian/compat Mattia Rizzolo <mattia@debian.org> - 2019-07-22 14:20 +0200
| From | Ondrej Novy <novy@ondrej.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-07-18 21:40 +0200 |
| Subject | Use debhelper-compat instead of debian/compat |
| Message-ID | <ylkpX-6Fv-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw
Hi, according to debhelper man package it's recommended to use debhelper-compat instead of debian/compat file. I would like to mass-commit this change to DPMT/PAPT, example: https://salsa.debian.org/python-team/modules/python-geoip2/commit/bc5ce34dd9bbfe3ecb7951aead267dbdaba3376a Any thoughts? -- Best regards Ondřej Nový
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Daniele Tricoli <eriol@debian.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-07-19 00:20 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <ylmUN-8hT-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #11491 |
Hello Ondřej, On 18/07/2019 21:15, Ondrej Novy wrote: > > I would like to mass-commit this change to DPMT/PAPT, example: > > https://salsa.debian.org/python-team/modules/python-geoip2/commit/bc5ce34dd9bbfe3ecb7951aead267dbdaba3376a > > Any thoughts? Thanks, please go ahead! Regards, -- Daniele Tricoli 'eriol' https://mornie.org
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Craig Small <csmall@debian.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-07-19 00:50 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <ylnnP-8rS-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #11491 |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw
Why not, it's a simple change and will get them all into line. One question though, what happens if the package compat level is not the latest? - Craig
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Dmitry Shachnev <mitya57@debian.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-07-19 10:50 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <ylwKt-5O9-3@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #11493 |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw
On Fri, Jul 19, 2019 at 08:41:04AM +1000, Craig Small wrote: > Why not, it's a simple change and will get them all into line. > > One question though, what happens if the package compat level is not the > latest? debhelper currently Provides: debhelper-compat (= 9), debhelper-compat (= 10), debhelper-compat (= 11), debhelper-compat (= 12). So this change is safe to do for packages whose compat level is ≥ 9. -- Dmitry Shachnev
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Ondrej Novy <novy@ondrej.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-07-19 14:40 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <ylAl3-815-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #11495 |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw
Hi, čt 18. 7. 2019 v 19:41 odesílatel Craig Small <csmall@debian.org> napsal: > One question though, what happens if the package compat level is not the latest? I will keep the old one. pá 19. 7. 2019 v 5:43 odesílatel Dmitry Shachnev <mitya57@debian.org> napsal: > So this change is safe to do for packages whose compat level is ≥ 9. yes: https://github.com/onovy/onovy-mass/blob/master/checks/debhelper-compat#L11 čt 18. 7. 2019 v 20:34 odesílatel Scott Kitterman <debian@kitterman.com> napsal: > Only if you leave compat at the same value for the package. Don't mass update the value. of course. I even check if d/compat and d/control have same version: https://github.com/onovy/onovy-mass/blob/master/checks/debhelper-compat#L16 -- Best regards Ondřej Nový
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Scott Kitterman <debian@kitterman.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-07-19 01:40 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <yload-wk-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #11491 |
On July 18, 2019 7:15:38 PM UTC, Ondrej Novy <novy@ondrej.org> wrote: >Hi, > >according to debhelper man package it's recommended to use >debhelper-compat >instead of debian/compat file. > >I would like to mass-commit this change to DPMT/PAPT, example: > >https://salsa.debian.org/python-team/modules/python-geoip2/commit/bc5ce34dd9bbfe3ecb7951aead267dbdaba3376a > >Any thoughts? Only if you leave compat at the same value for the package. Don't mass update the value. Scott K
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Andreas Tille <andreas@an3as.eu> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-07-22 13:00 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <ymEcV-6xU-5@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #11491 |
Hi Ondrej
On Thu, Jul 18, 2019 at 04:15:38PM -0300, Ondrej Novy wrote:
> according to debhelper man package it's recommended to use debhelper-compat
> instead of debian/compat file.
>
> I would like to mass-commit this change to DPMT/PAPT, example:
>
> https://salsa.debian.org/python-team/modules/python-geoip2/commit/bc5ce34dd9bbfe3ecb7951aead267dbdaba3376a
>
> Any thoughts?
I wonder whether this is safe for backports and backports-sloppy.
Kind regards
Andreas.
--
http://fam-tille.de
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Mattia Rizzolo <mattia@debian.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-07-22 14:20 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <ymFsl-7tj-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #11507 |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw
On Mon, Jul 22, 2019 at 12:53:23PM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
> I wonder whether this is safe for backports and backports-sloppy.
Yes, stretch-backports already supported it, so clearly buster-bpo and
stretch-bpo-sl support it.
--
regards,
Mattia Rizzolo
GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540 .''`.
more about me: https://mapreri.org : :' :
Launchpad user: https://launchpad.net/~mapreri `. `'`
Debian QA page: https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=mattia `-
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | linux.debian.maint.python
csiph-web