Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.maint.python > #11173 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Geert Stappers <stappers@debian.org> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2018-12-23 17:30 +0100 |
| Last post | 2018-12-26 14:50 +0100 |
| Articles | 4 — 4 participants |
Back to article view | Back to linux.debian.maint.python
reference package Geert Stappers <stappers@debian.org> - 2018-12-23 17:30 +0100
Re: reference package Scott Kitterman <debian@kitterman.com> - 2018-12-24 00:10 +0100
Re: reference package python3 PAPT Geert Stappers <stappers@stappers.nl> - 2018-12-25 23:30 +0100
Re: reference package python3 PAPT Dmitry Shachnev <mitya57@debian.org> - 2018-12-26 14:50 +0100
| From | Geert Stappers <stappers@debian.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-23 17:30 +0100 |
| Subject | reference package |
| Message-ID | <x8eNA-6dW-11@gated-at.bofh.it> |
Hi, Which PAPT package is a fairly good shape to be used as reference for bringing another PAPT package in better shape? Context: I'm new to PAPT and would like to have some examples packages. Groeten Geert Stappers DD -- Leven en laten leven
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Scott Kitterman <debian@kitterman.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-24 00:10 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <x8l2G-1Km-7@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #11173 |
On Sunday, December 23, 2018 05:22:07 PM Geert Stappers wrote: > Hi, > > Which PAPT package is a fairly good shape to be used as reference > for bringing another PAPT package in better shape? > > > Context: > I'm new to PAPT and would like to have some examples packages. I think pymilter-milters is in pretty good shape (as of the version I just uploaded), keeping in mind it's still python2 and if your upstream supports it, you should try to go python3. Scott K
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Geert Stappers <stappers@stappers.nl> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-25 23:30 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: reference package python3 PAPT |
| Message-ID | <x93n4-30K-9@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #11174 |
On Sun, Dec 23, 2018 at 05:52:22PM -0500, Scott Kitterman wrote: > On Sunday, December 23, 2018 05:22:07 PM Geert Stappers wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Which PAPT package is a fairly good shape to be used as reference > > for bringing another PAPT package in better shape? > > > > > > Context: > > I'm new to PAPT and would like to have some examples packages. > > I think pymilter-milters is in pretty good shape (as of the version I just > uploaded), keeping in mind it's still python2 and if your upstream supports > it, you should try to go python3. Thank you, it got me started. And I have updated the subject line with the intention that more possible reference packages are being reported. Groeten Geert Stappers Who cautiously begins to understand that there is nothing really special about packaging Python applications. But still in doubt. -- Leven en laten leven
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Dmitry Shachnev <mitya57@debian.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-26 14:50 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: reference package python3 PAPT |
| Message-ID | <x9hJn-3e5-9@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #11175 |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw
Hi Geert! On Tue, Dec 25, 2018 at 11:29:01PM +0100, Geert Stappers wrote: > > I think pymilter-milters is in pretty good shape (as of the version I just > > uploaded), keeping in mind it's still python2 and if your upstream supports > > it, you should try to go python3. > > Thank you, it got me started. > > And I have updated the subject line with the intention > that more possible reference packages are being reported. You can take a look at my retext package. It is Python 3 and in a good shape. The --no-rename option is specific to retext, but everything else is quite generic. -- Dmitry Shachnev
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | linux.debian.maint.python
csiph-web