Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.maint.python > #10302 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Ole Streicher <olebole@debian.org> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2018-03-24 11:00 +0100 |
| Last post | 2018-03-26 23:40 +0200 |
| Articles | 2 — 2 participants |
Back to article view | Back to linux.debian.maint.python
Extra debian.blends Python package Ole Streicher <olebole@debian.org> - 2018-03-24 11:00 +0100
Re: Extra debian.blends Python package Piotr Ożarowski <piotr@debian.org> - 2018-03-26 23:40 +0200
| From | Ole Streicher <olebole@debian.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-03-24 11:00 +0100 |
| Subject | Extra debian.blends Python package |
| Message-ID | <vwO7T-3P5-7@gated-at.bofh.it> |
Hi, I am currently rewriting part of the blends-dev package which is used for maintaining Debian Pure Blends into Python. This however comes out some abstractions of Blends (namely the tasks infrastructure) that may be re-usable on other places, f.e. in the blends.d.o web service. So it is probably a good idea to create a separate Python package from it. Since this package deals with tasks sources, it sounds natural to put this as a sub-package of the "debian" package. I would however not like to integrate the sources to python-debian. First, it is very new and likely to change API quickly in the next time. But also, the blends subpackage is quite special; there is no need to have it installed in such a broad manner as python-debian. And finally, I do not care about Python 2 compatibility here. What I could do easily is to create a python3-debian-blends binary package (maintained in the "blends" source package) for this subpackage, just installs a "blends.py" into ../dist-packages/debian/ Since this is however somehow hijacking (part of) the namespace of python-debian, I'd like to know the policy here. Are there any problems with that approach? Best regards Ole
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Piotr Ożarowski <piotr@debian.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-03-26 23:40 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <vxI0q-20p-19@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #10302 |
[Ole Streicher, 2018-03-24]
> I am currently rewriting part of the blends-dev package which is used
> for maintaining Debian Pure Blends into Python. This however comes out
> some abstractions of Blends (namely the tasks infrastructure) that may
> be re-usable on other places, f.e. in the blends.d.o web service. So it
> is probably a good idea to create a separate Python package from it.
>
> Since this package deals with tasks sources, it sounds natural to put
> this as a sub-package of the "debian" package. I would however not like
> to integrate the sources to python-debian. First, it is very new and
> likely to change API quickly in the next time. But also, the blends
> subpackage is quite special; there is no need to have it installed in
> such a broad manner as python-debian.
>
> And finally, I do not care about Python 2 compatibility here.
>
> What I could do easily is to create a python3-debian-blends binary
python3-debian-blends suggests some kind of addon ("-", not ".") to
"debian" module.
Will this package provide a public module? If so python-modulename is
your name, if not - why can't you re-use "blends" namespace? (blends-python3?)
> package (maintained in the "blends" source package) for this subpackage,
> just installs a "blends.py" into ../dist-packages/debian/
ah, so python3-debian.blends is the name. I'd talk with python3-debian
maintainers about including it in the python3-debian, though
--
GPG: 1D2F A898 58DA AF62 1786 2DF7 AEF6 F1A2 A745 7645
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | linux.debian.maint.python
csiph-web