Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.maint.python > #10578 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Diane Trout <diane@ghic.org> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2018-05-24 05:20 +0200 |
| Last post | 2018-05-24 07:00 +0200 |
| Articles | 4 — 3 participants |
Back to article view | Back to linux.debian.maint.python
hangups Diane Trout <diane@ghic.org> - 2018-05-24 05:20 +0200
Re: hangups Scott Kitterman <debian@kitterman.com> - 2018-05-24 06:30 +0200
Re: hangups Diane Trout <diane@ghic.org> - 2018-05-24 09:00 +0200
Re: hangups Ben Finney <bignose@debian.org> - 2018-05-24 07:00 +0200
| From | Diane Trout <diane@ghic.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-24 05:20 +0200 |
| Subject | hangups |
| Message-ID | <vSOXf-3wk-3@gated-at.bofh.it> |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw
Hi, I'd packaged a hangouts client called hangups for myself a while ago, and I thought I'd upload it to Debian. https://hangups.readthedocs.io/en/latest/ I built the package so most of the python code is in a python3-hangups module but the executable is in its own package. (one could use the API for other hangouts applications) I wasn't sure this should go into Debian python modules, or Debian python applications? Diane
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Scott Kitterman <debian@kitterman.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-24 06:30 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <vSQ2Z-4aJ-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #10578 |
On May 24, 2018 2:50:16 AM UTC, Diane Trout <diane@ghic.org> wrote: >Hi, > >I'd packaged a hangouts client called hangups for myself a while ago, >and I thought I'd upload it to Debian. > >https://hangups.readthedocs.io/en/latest/ > >I built the package so most of the python code is in a python3-hangups >module but the executable is in its own package. > >(one could use the API for other hangouts applications) > >I wasn't sure this should go into Debian python modules, or Debian >python applications? Since it has a public module, DPMT is a better bet. Scott K
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Diane Trout <diane@ghic.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-24 09:00 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <vSSo9-5rP-5@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #10579 |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw
> > I wasn't sure this should go into Debian python modules, or Debian > > python applications? > > Since it has a public module, DPMT is a better bet. > Ok, thank you. Also that also has the advantage that I already have permissions to create repositories in DPMT Diane
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Ben Finney <bignose@debian.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-24 07:00 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <vSQw1-4kJ-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #10578 |
Diane Trout <diane@ghic.org> writes: > I built the package so most of the python code is in a python3-hangups > module but the executable is in its own package. If they're separate Debian packages, then each can have a different value for Section, as needed. > (one could use the API for other hangouts applications) The Debian package for the library should have “Section: python”. The Debian package for the application should have a section appropriate for its primary use. Perhaps “Section: comms”, though other values might make better sense. -- \ “A poet more than thirty years old is simply an overgrown | `\ child.” —Henry L. Mencken | _o__) | Ben Finney
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | linux.debian.maint.python
csiph-web