Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.debian.maint.python > #10436 > unrolled thread

Profile-guided optimisation / link-time optimisation in Buster

Started byMatthew Woodcraft <matthew@woodcraft.me.uk>
First post2018-04-22 22:00 +0200
Last post2018-04-23 09:20 +0200
Articles 2 — 2 participants

Back to article view | Back to linux.debian.maint.python


Contents

  Profile-guided optimisation / link-time optimisation in Buster Matthew Woodcraft <matthew@woodcraft.me.uk> - 2018-04-22 22:00 +0200
    Re: Profile-guided optimisation / link-time optimisation in Buster Matthias Klose <doko@debian.org> - 2018-04-23 09:20 +0200

#10436 — Profile-guided optimisation / link-time optimisation in Buster

FromMatthew Woodcraft <matthew@woodcraft.me.uk>
Date2018-04-22 22:00 +0200
SubjectProfile-guided optimisation / link-time optimisation in Buster
Message-ID<vHtjs-8kM-7@gated-at.bofh.it>
I noticed that profile-guided optimisation and link-time optimisation
have both been unconditionally disabled in Buster's Python 3.6 and 3.7
packages, though 3.5 in Stretch had them both enabled (on common
platforms).

Can anyone tell me why this was done?


I see nothing about this in debian/changelog and the indentation in
debian/rules looks odd, so I'm wondering if it might even have been an
unintentional change.


It's these extra lines in debian/rules:

    with_pgo =
    with_lto =

just before the
  ifeq ($(with_lto),yes)
line.


-M-

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]


#10437

FromMatthias Klose <doko@debian.org>
Date2018-04-23 09:20 +0200
Message-ID<vHDVv-70R-3@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#10436
On 22.04.2018 21:31, Matthew Woodcraft wrote:
> I noticed that profile-guided optimisation and link-time optimisation
> have both been unconditionally disabled in Buster's Python 3.6 and 3.7
> packages, though 3.5 in Stretch had them both enabled (on common
> platforms).
> 
> Can anyone tell me why this was done?
> 
> 
> I see nothing about this in debian/changelog and the indentation in
> debian/rules looks odd, so I'm wondering if it might even have been an
> unintentional change.
> 
> 
> It's these extra lines in debian/rules:
> 
>    with_pgo =
>    with_lto =
> 
> just before the
>  ifeq ($(with_lto),yes)
> line.

yep, will turn it on again.

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | linux.debian.maint.python


csiph-web