Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.maint.python > #9840 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Diane Trout <diane@ghic.org> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2017-09-24 19:40 +0200 |
| Last post | 2017-09-24 22:10 +0200 |
| Articles | 2 — 2 participants |
Back to article view | Back to linux.debian.maint.python
Docs only packages? Diane Trout <diane@ghic.org> - 2017-09-24 19:40 +0200
Re: Docs only packages? "W. Martin Borgert" <debacle@debian.org> - 2017-09-24 22:10 +0200
| From | Diane Trout <diane@ghic.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-09-24 19:40 +0200 |
| Subject | Docs only packages? |
| Message-ID | <utj2N-391-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
Hi,
I was updating the intersphinx inventory files for statsmodels and one
was a link to:
'pydagogue' : ('http://matthew-brett.github.io/pydagogue/', None),
Source: https://github.com/matthew-brett/pydagogue
In theory we could have a documentation only package which would let
whatever statsmodels links were using that site resolve without network
access.
What do people think about having documentation only packages?
Diane
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "W. Martin Borgert" <debacle@debian.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-09-24 22:10 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <utlnZ-4Gy-41@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #9840 |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw
On 2017-09-24 10:35, Diane Trout wrote: > What do people think about having documentation only packages? Good thing. Like manpages etc.
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | linux.debian.maint.python
csiph-web