Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.maint.python > #9575 > unrolled thread
| Started by | kamaraju kusumanchi <raju.mailinglists@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2017-06-20 06:20 +0200 |
| Last post | 2017-06-21 18:20 +0200 |
| Articles | 6 — 3 participants |
Back to article view | Back to linux.debian.maint.python
python3 statsmodels? kamaraju kusumanchi <raju.mailinglists@gmail.com> - 2017-06-20 06:20 +0200
Re: python3 statsmodels? Sandro Tosi <morph@debian.org> - 2017-06-20 17:50 +0200
Re: python3 statsmodels? Yaroslav Halchenko <yoh@debian.org> - 2017-06-20 18:30 +0200
Re: python3 statsmodels? kamaraju kusumanchi <raju.mailinglists@gmail.com> - 2017-06-21 17:40 +0200
Re: python3 statsmodels? kamaraju kusumanchi <raju.mailinglists@gmail.com> - 2017-06-21 17:30 +0200
Re: python3 statsmodels? Sandro Tosi <morph@debian.org> - 2017-06-21 18:20 +0200
| From | kamaraju kusumanchi <raju.mailinglists@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-06-20 06:20 +0200 |
| Subject | python3 statsmodels? |
| Message-ID | <tUiNX-3FC-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
I see that there is no statsmodels package for python3 in Stretch. % apt-cache search statsmodels python3 python3-seaborn - statistical visualization library and noticed this bug https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=782963 which was filed more than two years ago. Just wanted to see if some developer would be interested in uploading a python3 version? Also, if statsmodels is somehow deprecated, can you suggest some alternatives to do Ordinary Least Squares regression etc., using python3? thanks raju -- Kamaraju S Kusumanchi | http://raju.shoutwiki.com/wiki/Blog
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sandro Tosi <morph@debian.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-06-20 17:50 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <tUtzH-238-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #9575 |
On Tue, Jun 20, 2017 at 12:18 AM, kamaraju kusumanchi <raju.mailinglists@gmail.com> wrote: > I see that there is no statsmodels package for python3 in Stretch. > > % apt-cache search statsmodels python3 > python3-seaborn - statistical visualization library statsmodels is maintained by Debian science team (https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/statsmodels) so i suggest to contact them directly (CCed them here) -- Sandro "morph" Tosi My website: http://sandrotosi.me/ Me at Debian: http://wiki.debian.org/SandroTosi G+: https://plus.google.com/u/0/+SandroTosi
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Yaroslav Halchenko <yoh@debian.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-06-20 18:30 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <tUucq-2wu-35@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #9578 |
On Tue, 20 Jun 2017, Sandro Tosi wrote: > On Tue, Jun 20, 2017 at 12:18 AM, kamaraju kusumanchi > <raju.mailinglists@gmail.com> wrote: > > I see that there is no statsmodels package for python3 in Stretch. > > % apt-cache search statsmodels python3 > > python3-seaborn - statistical visualization library > statsmodels is maintained by Debian science team > (https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/statsmodels) so i suggest to contact > them directly (CCed them here) yeap -- would be lovely to have python3 build... debian/rules is quite ad-hoc/elaborate but somewhat inline with how things are done for pandas as well... I might look into it at some point (but not within upcoming 2 weeks) but would even more appreciate help from the team mates or outside contributors ;) Cheers -- Yaroslav O. Halchenko Center for Open Neuroscience http://centerforopenneuroscience.org Dartmouth College, 419 Moore Hall, Hinman Box 6207, Hanover, NH 03755 Phone: +1 (603) 646-9834 Fax: +1 (603) 646-1419 WWW: http://www.linkedin.com/in/yarik
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | kamaraju kusumanchi <raju.mailinglists@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-06-21 17:40 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <tUPTz-7Ui-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #9580 |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw
On Tuesday, June 20, 2017, Yaroslav Halchenko <yoh@debian.org> wrote: > > > statsmodels is maintained by Debian science team > > (https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/statsmodels) so i suggest to contact > > them directly (CCed them here) > > yeap -- would be lovely to have python3 build... debian/rules is quite > ad-hoc/elaborate but somewhat inline with how things are done for pandas > as well... I might look into it at some point (but not within upcoming 2 > weeks) but would even more appreciate help from the team mates or > outside contributors ;) > > I do not have enough know how to package it but it is a very useful package to do ols analysis. For now I installed conda which has this for python3. Also, what is the rationale for keeping this under debian-science instead of moving to say debian-python? Having all python packages in one team would make it more easy to collaborate? Raju -- Kamaraju S Kusumanchi | http://raju.shoutwiki.com/wiki/Blog
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | kamaraju kusumanchi <raju.mailinglists@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-06-21 17:30 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <tUPJT-7QM-7@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #9578 |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw
On Tuesday, June 20, 2017, Sandro Tosi <morph@debian.org> wrote: > On Tue, Jun 20, 2017 at 12:18 AM, kamaraju kusumanchi > <raju.mailinglists@gmail.com <javascript:;>> wrote: > > I see that there is no statsmodels package for python3 in Stretch. > > > > % apt-cache search statsmodels python3 > > python3-seaborn - statistical visualization library > > statsmodels is maintained by Debian science team > (https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/statsmodels) so i suggest to contact > them directly (CCed them here) Why? Is there any specific reason? Wouldn't it make sense to bring everything under one umbrella. Raju -- Kamaraju S Kusumanchi | http://raju.shoutwiki.com/wiki/Blog
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sandro Tosi <morph@debian.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-06-21 18:20 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <tUQwh-8qD-3@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #9581 |
>> statsmodels is maintained by Debian science team >> (https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/statsmodels) so i suggest to contact >> them directly (CCed them here) > > Why? Is there any specific reason? Wouldn't it make sense to bring > everything under one umbrella. because if you want to get an answer to your question you have to ask it to the right recipient. Currently statsmodels is maintained by another team, so the point of bring all under the same umbrella is out of topic. i suggest you to bring your ideas to the current maintainers (Yaroslav already replied, and more in general the Debian Science Team is the recipient you want to contact for statsmodels) -- Sandro "morph" Tosi My website: http://sandrotosi.me/ Me at Debian: http://wiki.debian.org/SandroTosi G+: https://plus.google.com/u/0/+SandroTosi
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | linux.debian.maint.python
csiph-web