Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.debian.maint.python > #9575 > unrolled thread

python3 statsmodels?

Started bykamaraju kusumanchi <raju.mailinglists@gmail.com>
First post2017-06-20 06:20 +0200
Last post2017-06-21 18:20 +0200
Articles 6 — 3 participants

Back to article view | Back to linux.debian.maint.python


Contents

  python3 statsmodels? kamaraju kusumanchi <raju.mailinglists@gmail.com> - 2017-06-20 06:20 +0200
    Re: python3 statsmodels? Sandro Tosi <morph@debian.org> - 2017-06-20 17:50 +0200
      Re: python3 statsmodels? Yaroslav Halchenko <yoh@debian.org> - 2017-06-20 18:30 +0200
        Re: python3 statsmodels? kamaraju kusumanchi <raju.mailinglists@gmail.com> - 2017-06-21 17:40 +0200
      Re: python3 statsmodels? kamaraju kusumanchi <raju.mailinglists@gmail.com> - 2017-06-21 17:30 +0200
        Re: python3 statsmodels? Sandro Tosi <morph@debian.org> - 2017-06-21 18:20 +0200

#9575 — python3 statsmodels?

Fromkamaraju kusumanchi <raju.mailinglists@gmail.com>
Date2017-06-20 06:20 +0200
Subjectpython3 statsmodels?
Message-ID<tUiNX-3FC-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
I see that there is no statsmodels package for python3 in Stretch.

% apt-cache search statsmodels python3
python3-seaborn - statistical visualization library

and noticed this bug
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=782963 which was
filed more than two years ago.

Just wanted to see if some developer would be interested in uploading
a python3 version?

Also, if statsmodels is somehow deprecated, can you suggest some
alternatives to do Ordinary Least Squares regression etc., using
python3?

thanks
raju
-- 
Kamaraju S Kusumanchi | http://raju.shoutwiki.com/wiki/Blog

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]


#9578

FromSandro Tosi <morph@debian.org>
Date2017-06-20 17:50 +0200
Message-ID<tUtzH-238-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#9575
On Tue, Jun 20, 2017 at 12:18 AM, kamaraju kusumanchi
<raju.mailinglists@gmail.com> wrote:
> I see that there is no statsmodels package for python3 in Stretch.
>
> % apt-cache search statsmodels python3
> python3-seaborn - statistical visualization library

statsmodels is maintained by Debian science team
(https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/statsmodels) so i suggest to contact
them directly (CCed them here)

-- 
Sandro "morph" Tosi
My website: http://sandrotosi.me/
Me at Debian: http://wiki.debian.org/SandroTosi
G+: https://plus.google.com/u/0/+SandroTosi

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#9580

FromYaroslav Halchenko <yoh@debian.org>
Date2017-06-20 18:30 +0200
Message-ID<tUucq-2wu-35@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#9578
On Tue, 20 Jun 2017, Sandro Tosi wrote:

> On Tue, Jun 20, 2017 at 12:18 AM, kamaraju kusumanchi
> <raju.mailinglists@gmail.com> wrote:
> > I see that there is no statsmodels package for python3 in Stretch.

> > % apt-cache search statsmodels python3
> > python3-seaborn - statistical visualization library

> statsmodels is maintained by Debian science team
> (https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/statsmodels) so i suggest to contact
> them directly (CCed them here)

yeap -- would be lovely to have python3 build... debian/rules is quite
ad-hoc/elaborate but somewhat inline with how things are done for pandas
as well... I might look into it at some point (but not within upcoming 2
weeks) but would even more appreciate help from the team mates or
outside contributors ;)

Cheers
-- 
Yaroslav O. Halchenko
Center for Open Neuroscience     http://centerforopenneuroscience.org
Dartmouth College, 419 Moore Hall, Hinman Box 6207, Hanover, NH 03755
Phone: +1 (603) 646-9834                       Fax: +1 (603) 646-1419
WWW:   http://www.linkedin.com/in/yarik        

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#9582

Fromkamaraju kusumanchi <raju.mailinglists@gmail.com>
Date2017-06-21 17:40 +0200
Message-ID<tUPTz-7Ui-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#9580

[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw

On Tuesday, June 20, 2017, Yaroslav Halchenko <yoh@debian.org> wrote:

>
> > statsmodels is maintained by Debian science team
> > (https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/statsmodels) so i suggest to contact
> > them directly (CCed them here)
>
> yeap -- would be lovely to have python3 build... debian/rules is quite
> ad-hoc/elaborate but somewhat inline with how things are done for pandas
> as well... I might look into it at some point (but not within upcoming 2
> weeks) but would even more appreciate help from the team mates or
> outside contributors ;)
>
>
I do not have enough know how to package it but it is a very useful package
to do ols analysis. For now I installed conda which has this for python3.

Also, what is the rationale for keeping this under debian-science instead
of moving to say debian-python? Having all python packages in one team
would make it more easy to collaborate?

Raju


-- 
Kamaraju S Kusumanchi | http://raju.shoutwiki.com/wiki/Blog

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#9581

Fromkamaraju kusumanchi <raju.mailinglists@gmail.com>
Date2017-06-21 17:30 +0200
Message-ID<tUPJT-7QM-7@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#9578

[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw

On Tuesday, June 20, 2017, Sandro Tosi <morph@debian.org> wrote:

> On Tue, Jun 20, 2017 at 12:18 AM, kamaraju kusumanchi
> <raju.mailinglists@gmail.com <javascript:;>> wrote:
> > I see that there is no statsmodels package for python3 in Stretch.
> >
> > % apt-cache search statsmodels python3
> > python3-seaborn - statistical visualization library
>
> statsmodels is maintained by Debian science team
> (https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/statsmodels) so i suggest to contact
> them directly (CCed them here)


Why? Is there any specific reason? Wouldn't it make sense to bring
everything under one umbrella.

Raju


-- 
Kamaraju S Kusumanchi | http://raju.shoutwiki.com/wiki/Blog

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#9583

FromSandro Tosi <morph@debian.org>
Date2017-06-21 18:20 +0200
Message-ID<tUQwh-8qD-3@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#9581
>> statsmodels is maintained by Debian science team
>> (https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/statsmodels) so i suggest to contact
>> them directly (CCed them here)
>
> Why? Is there any specific reason? Wouldn't it make sense to bring
> everything under one umbrella.

because if you want to get an answer to your question you have to ask
it to the right recipient. Currently statsmodels is maintained by
another team, so the point of bring all under the same umbrella is out
of topic. i suggest you to bring your ideas to the current maintainers
(Yaroslav already replied, and more in general the Debian Science Team
is the recipient you want to contact for statsmodels)

-- 
Sandro "morph" Tosi
My website: http://sandrotosi.me/
Me at Debian: http://wiki.debian.org/SandroTosi
G+: https://plus.google.com/u/0/+SandroTosi

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | linux.debian.maint.python


csiph-web