Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > linux.debian.maint.python > #15100 > unrolled thread

Re: dask.distributed RC bug #1042135

Back to article view | Back to linux.debian.maint.python

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.

Contents

  Re: dask.distributed RC bug #1042135 Julian Gilbey <jdg@debian.org> - 2023-08-06 17:30 +0200
    Re: dask.distributed RC bug #1042135 Diane Trout <diane@ghic.org> - 2023-08-11 19:40 +0200
      Re: dask.distributed RC bug #1042135 Julian Gilbey <jdg@debian.org> - 2023-08-13 08:20 +0200

#15100 — Re: dask.distributed RC bug #1042135

Hi Diane (and cc'ing the correct mailing list - oops!),

On Fri, Aug 04, 2023 at 09:37:48AM -0700, Diane Trout wrote:
> On Fri, 2023-08-04 at 14:02 +0100, Julian Gilbey wrote:
> > Hi Diane,
> > 
> > I just got emails telling me that some of my packages would be
> > removed
> > from testing because they (recursively) (build-)depend on
> > dask.distributed: https://bugs.debian.org/1042135
> > 
> > Are you able to take a look at this soon, or would you like someone
> > to
> > do a team upload?
> > 
> > There is also a newer version available: 2023.7.1, which may well
> > resolve this.
> 
> Last time I tried updating pyarrow wasn't properly optional and we
> don't have it packaged. (And it's actually in a single repository that
> builds multiple language modules)
> 
> Dask has updated their build system some, and let me see if it'll
> update.
> 
> If I don't manage to get to it, make sure that if you try you have to
> update both dask and dask.distributed together, and it's best to makes
> sure that you run the dask.distributed tests using the updated dask.
> 
> That's where why it's usually been difficult to update.

Thanks so much!  I see you've already started on dask :)

I took at quick look at arrow - yikes!  There is potentially work
afoot on this though:
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=970021

Best wishes,

   Julian

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#15114

> > 
> 
> Thanks so much!  I see you've already started on dask :)
> 
> I took at quick look at arrow - yikes!  There is potentially work
> afoot on this though:
> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=970021
> 

Dask & dask.distributed 2023.8.0 was easier to update than some of the
other versions they had between 2022.12 and now.

Dask would still benifit from pyarrow, by I added enough
pytest.importorskip to avoid triggering the tests that depend on
pyarrow.

It also looks like it builds for me and the debian builder so I closed
1042135.

Hopefully that helps. (And it looks like it's got some code for pandas
2.0 so hopefully that'll help Rebecca Palmer.

Diane

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#15116

Hi Diane,

On Fri, Aug 11, 2023 at 10:05:53AM -0700, Diane Trout wrote:
> > > 
> > 
> > Thanks so much!  I see you've already started on dask :)
> > 
> > I took at quick look at arrow - yikes!  There is potentially work
> > afoot on this though:
> > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=970021
> > 
> 
> Dask & dask.distributed 2023.8.0 was easier to update than some of the
> other versions they had between 2022.12 and now.
> 
> Dask would still benifit from pyarrow, by I added enough
> pytest.importorskip to avoid triggering the tests that depend on
> pyarrow.
> 
> It also looks like it builds for me and the debian builder so I closed
> 1042135.
> 
> Hopefully that helps. (And it looks like it's got some code for pandas
> 2.0 so hopefully that'll help Rebecca Palmer.

That's fantastic - thank you so much!

:-)

   Julian

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Back to top | Article view | linux.debian.maint.python

csiph-web