Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.debian.maint.python > #15055 > unrolled thread

Should cocotb & pyuvm be under Electronics or Python team ?

Started byأحمد المحمودي <aelmahmoudy@users.sourceforge.net>
First post2023-07-23 02:00 +0200
Last post2023-07-23 15:30 +0200
Articles 2 — 2 participants

Back to article view | Back to linux.debian.maint.python


Contents

  Should cocotb & pyuvm be under Electronics or Python team ? أحمد المحمودي <aelmahmoudy@users.sourceforge.net> - 2023-07-23 02:00 +0200
    Aw: Should cocotb & pyuvm be under Electronics or Python team ? Steffen Möller <steffen_moeller@gmx.de> - 2023-07-23 15:30 +0200

#15055 — Should cocotb & pyuvm be under Electronics or Python team ?

Fromأحمد المحمودي <aelmahmoudy@users.sourceforge.net>
Date2023-07-23 02:00 +0200
SubjectShould cocotb & pyuvm be under Electronics or Python team ?
Message-ID<GUuFX-24GV-3@gated-at.bofh.it>

[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw

Hello, 

  I am currently working on packages for cocotb & pyuvm, both are Python 
  packages, that are used for verification (simulation) of VHDL/*Verilog 
  models, ie. their scope is electronics. Do I am wondering whether to 
  package them under Electeonics team or Python team.

  Also, I've set the Section source control field to 'electronics', yet 
  lintian complained that since the binary package names are 
  python3-{cocotb/pyuvm}, then the section should be 'python'. Should I 
  ignore/override that ? Or should I modifybthe Section field to 
  'python' ?

Thanks


-- 
‎أحمد المحمودي (Ahmed El-Mahmoudy)
 Digital design engineer
GPG KeyIDs: 4096R/A7EF5671 2048R/EDDDA1B7
GPG Fingerprints:
 6E2E E4BB 72E2 F417 D066  6ABF 7B30 B496 A7EF 5761
 8206 A196 2084 7E6D 0DF8  B176 BC19 6A94 EDDD A1B7

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]


#15059 — Aw: Should cocotb & pyuvm be under Electronics or Python team ?

FromSteffen Möller <steffen_moeller@gmx.de>
Date2023-07-23 15:30 +0200
SubjectAw: Should cocotb & pyuvm be under Electronics or Python team ?
Message-ID<GUHjP-2dab-7@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#15055
Hello,

Thank you for your work!

I suggest to direct to electronics about everthing that is tailored for the electronics and only have non-electronic-specific dependencies with the Python repository.

Best,
Steffen

> Gesendet: Sonntag, 23. Juli 2023 um 01:51 Uhr
> Von: "أحمد المحمودي" <aelmahmoudy@users.sourceforge.net>
> An: debian-python@lists.debian.org, Pkg-electronics-devel@alioth-lists.debian.net
> Betreff: Should cocotb & pyuvm be under Electronics or Python team ?
>
> Hello, 
> 
>   I am currently working on packages for cocotb & pyuvm, both are Python 
>   packages, that are used for verification (simulation) of VHDL/*Verilog 
>   models, ie. their scope is electronics. Do I am wondering whether to 
>   package them under Electeonics team or Python team.
> 
>   Also, I've set the Section source control field to 'electronics', yet 
>   lintian complained that since the binary package names are 
>   python3-{cocotb/pyuvm}, then the section should be 'python'. Should I 
>   ignore/override that ? Or should I modifybthe Section field to 
>   'python' ?
> 
> Thanks
> 
> 
> -- 
> ‎أحمد المحمودي (Ahmed El-Mahmoudy)
>  Digital design engineer
> GPG KeyIDs: 4096R/A7EF5671 2048R/EDDDA1B7
> GPG Fingerprints:
>  6E2E E4BB 72E2 F417 D066  6ABF 7B30 B496 A7EF 5761
>  8206 A196 2084 7E6D 0DF8  B176 BC19 6A94 EDDD A1B7
>

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | linux.debian.maint.python


csiph-web