Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.maint.python > #14605 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Helmut Grohne <helmut@subdivi.de> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2022-11-05 11:30 +0100 |
| Last post | 2022-11-19 09:30 +0100 |
| Articles | 5 — 5 participants |
Back to article view | Back to linux.debian.maint.python
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Bug#1022526: python-ssdeep: FTBFS: distutils.errors.DistutilsClassError: command class <class '__main__.CFFIBuild'> must subclass Command Helmut Grohne <helmut@subdivi.de> - 2022-11-05 11:30 +0100
Bug#1022526: python-ssdeep: FTBFS: distutils.errors.DistutilsClassError: command class <class '__main__.CFFIBuild'> must subclass Command Stefano Rivera <stefanor@debian.org> - 2022-11-13 09:10 +0100
Bug#1022526: python-ssdeep: FTBFS: distutils.errors.DistutilsClassError: command class <class '__main__.CFFIBuild'> must subclass Command Adrian Bunk <bunk@debian.org> - 2022-11-19 01:10 +0100
Bug#1022526: python-ssdeep: FTBFS: distutils.errors.DistutilsClassError: command class <class '__main__.CFFIBuild'> must subclass Command Bo YU <tsu.yubo@gmail.com> - 2022-11-19 06:10 +0100
Bug#1022526: python-ssdeep: FTBFS: distutils.errors.DistutilsClassError: command class <class '__main__.CFFIBuild'> must subclass Command stefanor@debian.org - 2022-11-19 09:30 +0100
| From | Helmut Grohne <helmut@subdivi.de> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2022-11-05 11:30 +0100 |
| Subject | Bug#1022526: python-ssdeep: FTBFS: distutils.errors.DistutilsClassError: command class <class '__main__.CFFIBuild'> must subclass Command |
| Message-ID | <Foorn-1yeJ-3@gated-at.bofh.it> |
Control: tags -1 + upstream On Sun, Oct 23, 2022 at 03:37:36PM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > Source: python-ssdeep > Version: 3.1+dfsg-3 > Severity: serious > Justification: FTBFS > Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs > User: lucas@debian.org > Usertags: ftbfs-20221023 ftbfs-bookworm > > Hi, > > During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build > on amd64. At the time when I introduced python-ssdeep to Debian, fuzzy hashing was not a thing. tlsh didn't exist. Now it is there and tlsh seems technically supperior albeit incompatible. So unless there is some compatibility reason for keeping ssdeep, I think it should be RoQAed. And no, updating it to 3.4 does not fix the ftbfs. Would someone handle dnstwist, which is the only remaining dependency? Helmut
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Stefano Rivera <stefanor@debian.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2022-11-13 09:10 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <FrgdY-3ou4-3@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #14605 |
Hi Helmut (2022.11.04_11:36:41_+0200) > And no, updating it to 3.4 does not fix the ftbfs. Updating it to 3.4.1 might. It includes this commit: https://github.com/DinoTools/python-ssdeep/commit/fce02106c07ff56a84097dec0df02fb00ef69dc7 which moves the setuptools import above the first distutils import, which should resolve this issue. SR -- Stefano Rivera http://tumbleweed.org.za/ +1 415 683 3272
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Adrian Bunk <bunk@debian.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2022-11-19 01:10 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <FtjAJ-4HnU-7@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #14621 |
Control: tags -1 fixed-upstream On Sun, Nov 13, 2022 at 10:04:04AM +0200, Stefano Rivera wrote: > Hi Helmut (2022.11.04_11:36:41_+0200) > > And no, updating it to 3.4 does not fix the ftbfs. > > Updating it to 3.4.1 might. It includes this commit: > https://github.com/DinoTools/python-ssdeep/commit/fce02106c07ff56a84097dec0df02fb00ef69dc7 > which moves the setuptools import above the first distutils import, > which should resolve this issue. I can confirm that 3.4.1 does fix the build (but I am reluctant to update it myself). > SR cu Adrian
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Bo YU <tsu.yubo@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2022-11-19 06:10 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <Ftoh3-4KpL-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #14625 |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw
Hi, On Sat, Nov 19, 2022 at 02:06:04AM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote: >Control: tags -1 fixed-upstream > >On Sun, Nov 13, 2022 at 10:04:04AM +0200, Stefano Rivera wrote: >> Hi Helmut (2022.11.04_11:36:41_+0200) >> > And no, updating it to 3.4 does not fix the ftbfs. >> >> Updating it to 3.4.1 might. It includes this commit: >> https://github.com/DinoTools/python-ssdeep/commit/fce02106c07ff56a84097dec0df02fb00ef69dc7 >> which moves the setuptools import above the first distutils import, >> which should resolve this issue. > >I can confirm that 3.4.1 does fix the build >(but I am reluctant to update it myself). Is it ok to update for me? I have built it based on 3.4.1: https://salsa.debian.org/python-team/packages/python-ssdeep/-/tree/debian/main/ One question: If I put the packahe under Debian Python team, should to change maintainer to DPT from QA team? https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=952840 -- Regards, -- Bo YU
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | stefanor@debian.org |
|---|---|
| Date | 2022-11-19 09:30 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <FtreV-4Msr-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #14626 |
Hi Bo (2022.11.19_05:05:19_+0000) > One question: > If I put the packahe under Debian Python team, should to change > maintainer to DPT from QA team? Yes. And if it's in the Python Team it needs a human maintainer/uploader too. SR -- Stefano Rivera http://tumbleweed.org.za/ +1 415 683 3272
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | linux.debian.maint.python
csiph-web