Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.debian.maint.python > #14815 > unrolled thread

Re: twitterwatch - upload needed

Started byEmmanuel Arias <eamanu@yaerobi.com>
First post2023-01-14 02:30 +0100
Last post2023-01-17 23:00 +0100
Articles 3 — 1 participant

Back to article view | Back to linux.debian.maint.python

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.


Contents

  Re: twitterwatch - upload needed Emmanuel Arias <eamanu@yaerobi.com> - 2023-01-14 02:30 +0100
    Re: twitterwatch - upload needed Emmanuel Arias <eamanu@yaerobi.com> - 2023-01-15 13:30 +0100
      Re: twitterwatch - upload needed Emmanuel Arias <eamanu@yaerobi.com> - 2023-01-17 23:00 +0100

#14815 — Re: twitterwatch - upload needed

FromEmmanuel Arias <eamanu@yaerobi.com>
Date2023-01-14 02:30 +0100
SubjectRe: twitterwatch - upload needed
Message-ID<FNDwR-eT9-3@gated-at.bofh.it>

[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw

Hi,


On Fri, Jan 13, 2023 at 09:49:15PM +0100, Malik wrote:
> Hello DPT,
> 
> I have created a patch to close #996799 in twitterwatch package [1]
> I need a mainter to upload the current version (0.1-3) to the tftp-master

As Timo mentioned in the bug report. It would be great if the Homepage can
be updated as well.

Also, the package doesn't have tests (if I'm not wrong). Could you add
autopkgtests?

Cheers,
Emmanuel
> 
> [1] https://salsa.debian.org/python-team/packages/twitterwatch
> 
> Thank you in  advance
> -- 
> Malik Mlitat


[toc] | [next] | [standalone]


#14824

FromEmmanuel Arias <eamanu@yaerobi.com>
Date2023-01-15 13:30 +0100
Message-ID<FOaj7-A8g-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#14815

[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw

Hi,

On Sun, Jan 15, 2023 at 12:24:43PM +0100, Malik wrote:
> Hello Emannauel,
> 
> Thank you for the suggestions.
> 
> I was not sure how to handle the new homepage [1]  since there are no tags
> or releases maintained by the upstream maintainer, should I delete the
> watchfile? or can I watch the version in the setup.py ?

Oh, I didn't note it. Perhaps it's a good reason to contact to upstream
and ask for them. Don't remove d/watch file.

> 
> And for the tests, should I mock the calls to the "internet" since those
> would be skipped if conceited to the internet

Yes, or skip them.
> 
> 
> [1]: https://gitlab.com/chaica/twitterwatch/-/tags
> 
> regards,
> Malik
> 

Cheers,
Emmanuel

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#14842

FromEmmanuel Arias <eamanu@yaerobi.com>
Date2023-01-17 23:00 +0100
Message-ID<FP29Q-18gP-15@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#14824

[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw

Hi,

On Tue, Jan 17, 2023 at 6:16 PM Malik <mlitat88@googlemail.com> wrote:

> Hello Emmanuel,
>
> currently upstream-author has no plan to update or release any further
> releases for this project [1]
>
Ok

>
>

> [1] https://gitlab.com/chaica/twitterwatch/-/issues/1
>
> kind regards,
> Malik
>

If you leave the package as is it now, when a new release exists, d/watch
won't note it.
So, I'd change the d/watch to the Gitlab repository. Also Homepage link.

Cheers,
Emmanuel

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | linux.debian.maint.python


csiph-web