Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.debian.maint.python > #14434 > unrolled thread

New upstream version for numpydoc

Started byChiara Marmo <marmochiaskl@gmail.com>
First post2022-09-04 03:40 +0200
Last post2022-09-04 21:00 +0200
Articles 3 — 2 participants

Back to article view | Back to linux.debian.maint.python


Contents

  New upstream version for numpydoc Chiara Marmo <marmochiaskl@gmail.com> - 2022-09-04 03:40 +0200
    Re: New upstream version for numpydoc Jeroen Ploemen <jcfp@debian.org> - 2022-09-04 18:30 +0200
      Re: New upstream version for numpydoc Chiara Marmo <marmochiaskl@gmail.com> - 2022-09-04 21:00 +0200

#14434 — New upstream version for numpydoc

FromChiara Marmo <marmochiaskl@gmail.com>
Date2022-09-04 03:40 +0200
SubjectNew upstream version for numpydoc
Message-ID<F1MM9-59iy-7@gated-at.bofh.it>

[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw

Dear list,

I have opened merge requests on salsa for numpydoc [1] in order to update
to the last available upstream version 1.4.0

If someone have sometime to check and comment... thanks!

Chiara

[1] https://salsa.debian.org/python-team/packages/numpydoc

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]


#14436

FromJeroen Ploemen <jcfp@debian.org>
Date2022-09-04 18:30 +0200
Message-ID<F20Fr-5hWs-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#14434

[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw

On Sat, 3 Sep 2022 15:33:04 -1000
Chiara Marmo <marmochiaskl@gmail.com> wrote:

> I have opened merge requests on salsa for numpydoc [1] in order to
> update to the last available upstream version 1.4.0

Any reason why you're no longer closing #1013376 when building your
updated package against experimental seems to work just fine?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#14437

FromChiara Marmo <marmochiaskl@gmail.com>
Date2022-09-04 21:00 +0200
Message-ID<F230C-5jaK-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#14436

[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw

I wasn't sure anymore that the bug was closed as I couldn't check versus
the right version of docutils and I couldn't find quckly the experimental
build.

Chiara

On Sunday, September 4, 2022, Jeroen Ploemen <jcfp@debian.org> wrote:
> On Sat, 3 Sep 2022 15:33:04 -1000
> Chiara Marmo <marmochiaskl@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> I have opened merge requests on salsa for numpydoc [1] in order to
>> update to the last available upstream version 1.4.0
>
> Any reason why you're no longer closing #1013376 when building your
> updated package against experimental seems to work just fine?
>

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | linux.debian.maint.python


csiph-web