Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > linux.debian.maint.python > #14062 > unrolled thread

re: PyQt5 question: why are QOpenGLTimeMonitor/QOpenGLTimerQuery not defined on armhf?

Back to article view | Back to linux.debian.maint.python

Contents

  re: PyQt5 question: why are QOpenGLTimeMonitor/QOpenGLTimerQuery not  defined on armhf? Peter Michael Green <plugwash@debian.org> - 2022-04-15 16:30 +0200
    Re: PyQt5 question: why are QOpenGLTimeMonitor/QOpenGLTimerQuery not  defined on armhf? Julian Gilbey <julian@d-and-j.net> - 2022-04-15 16:40 +0200

#14062 — re: PyQt5 question: why are QOpenGLTimeMonitor/QOpenGLTimerQuery not defined on armhf?

[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw

> But nowhere do I find any of QT_NO_OPENGL or QT_OPENGL_ES* defined in
> the package (but then maybe I'm not looking in the right place?  So I
> don't know why these two classes are included in the amd64 version of
> the package but not the armhf version.
The reason is that QT on armel/armhf is built for opengl ES rather
than desktop opengl. I believe the reason for this is historic
hardware support on armhf systems.

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#14063

On Fri, Apr 15, 2022 at 03:01:43PM +0100, Peter Michael Green wrote:
>  But nowhere do I find any of QT_NO_OPENGL or QT_OPENGL_ES* defined in
>  the package (but then maybe I'm not looking in the right place?  So I
>  don't know why these two classes are included in the amd64 version of
>  the package but not the armhf version.
> 
> The reason is that QT on armel/armhf is built for opengl ES rather
> than desktop opengl. I believe the reason for this is historic
> hardware support on armhf systems.

Thanks Peter!

Best wishes,

   Julian

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Back to top | Article view | linux.debian.maint.python

csiph-web