Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.maint.python > #13723 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Thomas Goirand <zigo@debian.org> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2021-11-24 15:20 +0100 |
| Last post | 2021-11-24 15:40 +0100 |
| Articles | 2 — 2 participants |
Back to article view | Back to linux.debian.maint.python
Removal of python-flask-script and flask-assets from unstable/bookworm Thomas Goirand <zigo@debian.org> - 2021-11-24 15:20 +0100
Re: Removal of python-flask-script and flask-assets from unstable/bookworm Scott Talbert <swt@techie.net> - 2021-11-24 15:40 +0100
| From | Thomas Goirand <zigo@debian.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-11-24 15:20 +0100 |
| Subject | Removal of python-flask-script and flask-assets from unstable/bookworm |
| Message-ID | <Dn1hT-1HM-9@gated-at.bofh.it> |
Hi, flask-assets build-depends on python3-flask-script. python-flask-script depends on Flask, but isn't compatible with Flask 2.x which is now in unstable. python-flask-script has no commit or release since 2017. So both packages are kind of doomed... Neither python-flask-script or flask-assets have reverse dependencies. I am therefore hereby proposing the removal of python-flask-script and flask-assets from unstable/testing, which by the way will allow Flask to migrate to Bookworm. Your thoughts? Cheers, Thomas Goirand (zigo)
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Scott Talbert <swt@techie.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-11-24 15:40 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <Dn1Bf-1NN-3@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #13723 |
On Wed, 24 Nov 2021, Thomas Goirand wrote: > Hi, > > flask-assets build-depends on python3-flask-script. python-flask-script > depends on Flask, but isn't compatible with Flask 2.x which is now in > unstable. python-flask-script has no commit or release since 2017. > > So both packages are kind of doomed... > > Neither python-flask-script or flask-assets have reverse dependencies. > > I am therefore hereby proposing the removal of python-flask-script and > flask-assets from unstable/testing, which by the way will allow Flask to > migrate to Bookworm. > > Your thoughts? If it's desirable to keep flask-assets, another option might be to just RM python-flask-script. It looks like flask-assets should(?) still work without it. Also, python-flask-script currently FTBFS. Scott
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | linux.debian.maint.python
csiph-web