Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.debian.maint.python > #13690 > unrolled thread

Re: mass bug filling for nose removal (was: Bug#997758: nose: FTBFS: There is a syntax error in your configuration file: invalid syntax (conf.py, line 220))

Started byThomas Goirand <zigo@debian.org>
First post2021-11-11 11:10 +0100
Last post2021-11-11 18:00 +0100
Articles 4 — 3 participants

Back to article view | Back to linux.debian.maint.python

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.


Contents

  Re: mass bug filling for nose removal (was: Bug#997758: nose: FTBFS:  There is a syntax error in your configuration file: invalid syntax (conf.py,  line 220)) Thomas Goirand <zigo@debian.org> - 2021-11-11 11:10 +0100
    Re: mass bug filling for nose removal (was: Bug#997758: nose: FTBFS:  There is a syntax error in your configuration file: invalid syntax (conf.py,  line 220)) Jeremy Stanley <fungi@yuggoth.org> - 2021-11-11 13:40 +0100
    Re: mass bug filling for nose removal (was: Bug#997758: nose: FTBFS:  There is a syntax error in your configuration file: invalid syntax (conf.py,  line 220)) Dmitry Shachnev <mitya57@debian.org> - 2021-11-11 13:40 +0100
      Re: mass bug filling for nose removal (was: Bug#997758: nose: FTBFS:  There is a syntax error in your configuration file: invalid syntax (conf.py,  line 220)) Thomas Goirand <zigo@debian.org> - 2021-11-11 18:00 +0100

#13690 — Re: mass bug filling for nose removal (was: Bug#997758: nose: FTBFS: There is a syntax error in your configuration file: invalid syntax (conf.py, line 220))

FromThomas Goirand <zigo@debian.org>
Date2021-11-11 11:10 +0100
SubjectRe: mass bug filling for nose removal (was: Bug#997758: nose: FTBFS: There is a syntax error in your configuration file: invalid syntax (conf.py, line 220))
Message-ID<DifbP-7k6-11@gated-at.bofh.it>
On 10/24/21 3:24 PM, Dmitry Shachnev wrote:
> If anyone is still using nose (1.x), please port your packages to nose2,
> pure unittest or pytest. I am attaching a dd-list and I intend to do a MBF
> in a few weeks when I have more time.
> 
> --
> Dmitry Shachnev

Hi,

I wonder if we could do a mass bug filling for this. Your thoughts?

Cheers,

Thomas Goirand (zigo)

P.S: I'm not volunteering for doing it, just giving the idea...

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]


#13691

FromJeremy Stanley <fungi@yuggoth.org>
Date2021-11-11 13:40 +0100
Message-ID<DihwZ-8I-3@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#13690

[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw

On 2021-11-11 11:04:10 +0100 (+0100), Thomas Goirand wrote:
> On 10/24/21 3:24 PM, Dmitry Shachnev wrote:
[...]
> > I intend to do a MBF in a few weeks when I have more time.
> 
> I wonder if we could do a mass bug filling for this.
[...]

He does say right there, "I intend to do a MBF," so I assumed that's
been the plan all along? Or are you asking why it hasn't been
started now that it's been a few weeks?
-- 
Jeremy Stanley

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#13692

FromDmitry Shachnev <mitya57@debian.org>
Date2021-11-11 13:40 +0100
Message-ID<DihwZ-8I-5@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#13690

[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw

Hi Thomas!

On Thu, Nov 11, 2021 at 11:04:10AM +0100, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> On 10/24/21 3:24 PM, Dmitry Shachnev wrote:
> > If anyone is still using nose (1.x), please port your packages to nose2,
> > pure unittest or pytest. I am attaching a dd-list and I intend to do a MBF
> > in a few weeks when I have more time.
> >
> > --
> > Dmitry Shachnev
>
> Hi,
>
> I wonder if we could do a mass bug filling for this. Your thoughts?

Yes, this idea was present in my original mail you quoted here :)

I intend to do it at some point, but I can't yet say when it will happen.

--
Dmitry Shachnev

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#13693

FromThomas Goirand <zigo@debian.org>
Date2021-11-11 18:00 +0100
Message-ID<DilAB-2tO-7@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#13692
On 11/11/21 1:33 PM, Dmitry Shachnev wrote:
> Hi Thomas!
> 
> On Thu, Nov 11, 2021 at 11:04:10AM +0100, Thomas Goirand wrote:
>> On 10/24/21 3:24 PM, Dmitry Shachnev wrote:
>>> If anyone is still using nose (1.x), please port your packages to nose2,
>>> pure unittest or pytest. I am attaching a dd-list and I intend to do a MBF
>>> in a few weeks when I have more time.
>>>
>>> --
>>> Dmitry Shachnev
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I wonder if we could do a mass bug filling for this. Your thoughts?
> 
> Yes, this idea was present in my original mail you quoted here :)
> 
> I intend to do it at some point, but I can't yet say when it will happen.

Yes, but your original idea was to kick nose out of Debian before we get
the chance to fix. I believe it'd be nicer to do the MBF even if we keep
nose for a while, which is why I wrote about it again, as I didn't know
what your intention was.

Very good if you still have it in mind then! It'd be very useful to me
at least (as many of the package I contribute may be affected and it's
hard to have a vision of it without the MBF).

Cheers,

Thomas Goirand (zigo)

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | linux.debian.maint.python


csiph-web