Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.maint.python > #13661 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Thomas Goirand <zigo@debian.org> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2021-10-26 00:40 +0200 |
| Last post | 2021-10-26 00:40 +0200 |
| Articles | 1 — 1 participant |
Back to article view | Back to linux.debian.maint.python
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Bug#997758: nose: FTBFS: There is a syntax error in your configuration file: invalid syntax (conf.py, line 220) Thomas Goirand <zigo@debian.org> - 2021-10-26 00:40 +0200
| From | Thomas Goirand <zigo@debian.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-10-26 00:40 +0200 |
| Subject | Bug#997758: nose: FTBFS: There is a syntax error in your configuration file: invalid syntax (conf.py, line 220) |
| Message-ID | <DcgNj-4cu-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
On 10/25/21 8:18 PM, Dmitry Shachnev wrote: > However, it would be still nice to remove nose at some future point, maybe > before Bookworm release. Will do, probably for the next version of OpenStack (last one made me update 220 packages: that's a good way to review everything). > I'm impressed by the number of packages you have depending on nose, but if > they all come from the same upstream, maybe you can convince this upstream > to not rely on dead software. I believe most dependencies on Nose could be removed (for example, all of the OpenStack dashboard stuff...), but just right after a release isn't the best time to start the work... Cheers, Thomas Goirand (zigo)
Back to top | Article view | linux.debian.maint.python
csiph-web