Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.debian.maint.python > #13972 > unrolled thread

Bug#1005459: rdflib: FTBFS: dh_auto_test: error: pybuild --test --test-nose -i python{version} -p "3.10 3.9" returned exit code 13

Started byAndreas Tille <andreas@an3as.eu>
First post2022-02-24 13:50 +0100
Last post2022-02-27 17:50 +0100
Articles 3 — 3 participants

Back to article view | Back to linux.debian.maint.python

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.


Contents

  Bug#1005459: rdflib: FTBFS: dh_auto_test: error: pybuild --test --test-nose -i python{version} -p "3.10 3.9" returned exit code 13 Andreas Tille <andreas@an3as.eu> - 2022-02-24 13:50 +0100
    Bug#1005459: Any reason not to upload rdflib 6 to unstable (Was: rdflib: FTBFS: dh_auto_test: error: pybuild --test --test-nose -i python{version} -p "3.10 3.9" returned exit code 13) Andreas Tille <tille@debian.org> - 2022-02-24 22:00 +0100
      Please care for arm64 autopkgtest of rdflib (Was: Any reason not to  upload rdflib 6 to unstable) Andreas Tille <andreas@fam-tille.de> - 2022-02-27 17:50 +0100

#13972 — Bug#1005459: rdflib: FTBFS: dh_auto_test: error: pybuild --test --test-nose -i python{version} -p "3.10 3.9" returned exit code 13

FromAndreas Tille <andreas@an3as.eu>
Date2022-02-24 13:50 +0100
SubjectBug#1005459: rdflib: FTBFS: dh_auto_test: error: pybuild --test --test-nose -i python{version} -p "3.10 3.9" returned exit code 13
Message-ID<DUlJf-41qF-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
Hi Nilesh,

Am Thu, Feb 24, 2022 at 06:00:03PM +0530 schrieb Nilesh Patra:
> On 2/24/22 3:36 PM, Andreas Tille wrote:
> > I tried to follow your suggestion to upgrade rdflib to version 6 in Git.
> > Unfortunately I'm stumbling upon a different issue in the new test
> > suite[1].
> 
> One really odd thing I noticed is that there is no dh_auto_build is overridden but not triggered inside it again,
> and so dh_auto_build happening at all.
> So I enabled this, which got the tests running.
> Next there were some tests that need internet access or trying to open tcp ports, so I disabled them;
> after which the package is building.
> 
> I am simply running these tests also as autopkgtest with "needs-internet" restriction which should be a good
> enough scrutiny.
> 
> All changes in salsa. But please kindly check this properly before you do a dput.

Sorry for dragging you into this - the experimental branch was way
advanced which I learned in bug #995675.  This leaves the question how
we can proceed.  It makes probably sense to run ratt or something like
this to learn about packages that are broken.  Unfortunately I did
never got ratt working (since I failed to setup sbuild properly).

On the other hand in the current situation with two open RC bugs all
other packages are broken anyway and will be removed from testing if
we do not act upon the issue.  So may be we should upload to unstable?

What do you think?

Kind regards

       Andreas.


-- 
http://fam-tille.de

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]


#13974 — Bug#1005459: Any reason not to upload rdflib 6 to unstable (Was: rdflib: FTBFS: dh_auto_test: error: pybuild --test --test-nose -i python{version} -p "3.10 3.9" returned exit code 13)

FromAndreas Tille <tille@debian.org>
Date2022-02-24 22:00 +0100
SubjectBug#1005459: Any reason not to upload rdflib 6 to unstable (Was: rdflib: FTBFS: dh_auto_test: error: pybuild --test --test-nose -i python{version} -p "3.10 3.9" returned exit code 13)
Message-ID<DUtnr-461K-3@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#13972
Am Thu, Feb 24, 2022 at 01:40:51PM +0100 schrieb Andreas Tille:
> 
> On the other hand in the current situation with two open RC bugs all
> other packages are broken anyway and will be removed from testing if
> we do not act upon the issue.  So may be we should upload to unstable?

I'm tempted to upload rdflib 6.1.1 to unstable if nobody has good
reasons not to do so.

Kind regards

       Andreas. 

-- 
http://fam-tille.de

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#13980 — Please care for arm64 autopkgtest of rdflib (Was: Any reason not to upload rdflib 6 to unstable)

FromAndreas Tille <andreas@fam-tille.de>
Date2022-02-27 17:50 +0100
SubjectPlease care for arm64 autopkgtest of rdflib (Was: Any reason not to upload rdflib 6 to unstable)
Message-ID<DVuU9-4JvK-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#13974
Am Thu, Feb 24, 2022 at 09:54:24PM +0100 schrieb Andreas Tille:
> Am Thu, Feb 24, 2022 at 01:40:51PM +0100 schrieb Andreas Tille:
> > 
> > On the other hand in the current situation with two open RC bugs all
> > other packages are broken anyway and will be removed from testing if
> > we do not act upon the issue.  So may be we should upload to unstable?
> 
> I'm tempted to upload rdflib 6.1.1 to unstable if nobody has good
> reasons not to do so.

I did so and realised that autopkgtest fails for arm64.  Since I'm
on vacation this week it would be great if someone would care about

   https://ci.debian.net/data/autopkgtest/testing/arm64/c/cwltool/19607842/log.gz

Kind regards

       Andreas.

-- 
http://fam-tille.de

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | linux.debian.maint.python


csiph-web