Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.maint.python > #13972 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Andreas Tille <andreas@an3as.eu> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2022-02-24 13:50 +0100 |
| Last post | 2022-02-27 17:50 +0100 |
| Articles | 3 — 3 participants |
Back to article view | Back to linux.debian.maint.python
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Bug#1005459: rdflib: FTBFS: dh_auto_test: error: pybuild --test --test-nose -i python{version} -p "3.10 3.9" returned exit code 13 Andreas Tille <andreas@an3as.eu> - 2022-02-24 13:50 +0100
Bug#1005459: Any reason not to upload rdflib 6 to unstable (Was: rdflib: FTBFS: dh_auto_test: error: pybuild --test --test-nose -i python{version} -p "3.10 3.9" returned exit code 13) Andreas Tille <tille@debian.org> - 2022-02-24 22:00 +0100
Please care for arm64 autopkgtest of rdflib (Was: Any reason not to upload rdflib 6 to unstable) Andreas Tille <andreas@fam-tille.de> - 2022-02-27 17:50 +0100
| From | Andreas Tille <andreas@an3as.eu> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2022-02-24 13:50 +0100 |
| Subject | Bug#1005459: rdflib: FTBFS: dh_auto_test: error: pybuild --test --test-nose -i python{version} -p "3.10 3.9" returned exit code 13 |
| Message-ID | <DUlJf-41qF-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
Hi Nilesh,
Am Thu, Feb 24, 2022 at 06:00:03PM +0530 schrieb Nilesh Patra:
> On 2/24/22 3:36 PM, Andreas Tille wrote:
> > I tried to follow your suggestion to upgrade rdflib to version 6 in Git.
> > Unfortunately I'm stumbling upon a different issue in the new test
> > suite[1].
>
> One really odd thing I noticed is that there is no dh_auto_build is overridden but not triggered inside it again,
> and so dh_auto_build happening at all.
> So I enabled this, which got the tests running.
> Next there were some tests that need internet access or trying to open tcp ports, so I disabled them;
> after which the package is building.
>
> I am simply running these tests also as autopkgtest with "needs-internet" restriction which should be a good
> enough scrutiny.
>
> All changes in salsa. But please kindly check this properly before you do a dput.
Sorry for dragging you into this - the experimental branch was way
advanced which I learned in bug #995675. This leaves the question how
we can proceed. It makes probably sense to run ratt or something like
this to learn about packages that are broken. Unfortunately I did
never got ratt working (since I failed to setup sbuild properly).
On the other hand in the current situation with two open RC bugs all
other packages are broken anyway and will be removed from testing if
we do not act upon the issue. So may be we should upload to unstable?
What do you think?
Kind regards
Andreas.
--
http://fam-tille.de
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Andreas Tille <tille@debian.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2022-02-24 22:00 +0100 |
| Subject | Bug#1005459: Any reason not to upload rdflib 6 to unstable (Was: rdflib: FTBFS: dh_auto_test: error: pybuild --test --test-nose -i python{version} -p "3.10 3.9" returned exit code 13) |
| Message-ID | <DUtnr-461K-3@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #13972 |
Am Thu, Feb 24, 2022 at 01:40:51PM +0100 schrieb Andreas Tille:
>
> On the other hand in the current situation with two open RC bugs all
> other packages are broken anyway and will be removed from testing if
> we do not act upon the issue. So may be we should upload to unstable?
I'm tempted to upload rdflib 6.1.1 to unstable if nobody has good
reasons not to do so.
Kind regards
Andreas.
--
http://fam-tille.de
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Andreas Tille <andreas@fam-tille.de> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2022-02-27 17:50 +0100 |
| Subject | Please care for arm64 autopkgtest of rdflib (Was: Any reason not to upload rdflib 6 to unstable) |
| Message-ID | <DVuU9-4JvK-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #13974 |
Am Thu, Feb 24, 2022 at 09:54:24PM +0100 schrieb Andreas Tille:
> Am Thu, Feb 24, 2022 at 01:40:51PM +0100 schrieb Andreas Tille:
> >
> > On the other hand in the current situation with two open RC bugs all
> > other packages are broken anyway and will be removed from testing if
> > we do not act upon the issue. So may be we should upload to unstable?
>
> I'm tempted to upload rdflib 6.1.1 to unstable if nobody has good
> reasons not to do so.
I did so and realised that autopkgtest fails for arm64. Since I'm
on vacation this week it would be great if someone would care about
https://ci.debian.net/data/autopkgtest/testing/arm64/c/cwltool/19607842/log.gz
Kind regards
Andreas.
--
http://fam-tille.de
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | linux.debian.maint.python
csiph-web