Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.maint.python > #13925 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Julian Gilbey <jdg@debian.org> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2022-02-05 22:10 +0100 |
| Last post | 2022-02-08 08:00 +0100 |
| Articles | 7 — 4 participants |
Back to article view | Back to linux.debian.maint.python
Bug#1005043: lintian: check that Python version numbers are not 0.0.0 Julian Gilbey <jdg@debian.org> - 2022-02-05 22:10 +0100
Bug#1005043: lintian: check that Python version numbers are not 0.0.0 Julian Gilbey <jdg@debian.org> - 2022-02-06 13:30 +0100
Bug#1005043: lintian: check that Python version numbers are not 0.0.0 Stefano Rivera <stefanor@debian.org> - 2022-02-06 18:00 +0100
Bug#1005043: lintian: check that Python version numbers are not 0.0.0 Sandro Tosi <morph@debian.org> - 2022-02-06 21:40 +0100
Bug#1005043: lintian: check that Python version numbers are not 0.0.0 Julian Gilbey <jdg@debian.org> - 2022-02-07 07:40 +0100
Re: Bug#1005043: lintian: check that Python version numbers are not 0.0.0 Stefano Rivera <stefanor@debian.org> - 2022-02-08 01:30 +0100
Re: Bug#1005043: lintian: check that Python version numbers are not 0.0.0 Julian Gilbey <julian@d-and-j.net> - 2022-02-08 08:00 +0100
| From | Julian Gilbey <jdg@debian.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2022-02-05 22:10 +0100 |
| Subject | Bug#1005043: lintian: check that Python version numbers are not 0.0.0 |
| Message-ID | <DNAtH-Xe-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
Package: lintian Version: 2.111.0 Severity: wishlist X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-python@lists.debian.org I just ran into several Python packages that install modules with version number 0.0.0 because of some issue with their setup.py scripts. I just did the following on my testing system: lz4cat /var/lib/apt/lists/deb.debian.org_debian_dists_testing_main_Contents-all.lz4 | grep 'usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/.*-0\.0\.0\..*-info/PKG-INFO' | wc -l 24 lz4cat /var/lib/apt/lists/deb.debian.org_debian_dists_testing_main_Contents-all.lz4 | grep 'usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/.*-0\.0\.0\..*-info ' | wc -l 6 So there are at least about 30 packages with this problem. The test for this bug (and it should probably be recorded as an error, not just a warning, as no Python package should have a version number of 0.0.0) is simple: if the binary package contains has a file or directory with the name as in the above regex, then the package has this error. Best wishes, Julian
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Julian Gilbey <jdg@debian.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2022-02-06 13:30 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <DNOQ1-1ha-3@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #13925 |
On Sat, Feb 05, 2022 at 04:42:57PM -0500, Sandro Tosi wrote: > > The test for this bug (and it should probably be recorded as an error, > > not just a warning, as no Python package should have a version number > > of 0.0.0) > > what exactly is the problem that would make it an 'error'? When a package uses pkg_resources to determine the version number of some package, it is returned the wrong information. This is certainly a packaging error: the upstream package, as installed by pip, announces "this is version 1.2.3" but the Debian package announces "this is version 0.0.0". In the couple of cases I've looked at so far, it is due to the upstream version using use_scm_version in setup.py. This works fine for a version that is in a Git repository, but it doesn't work for Debian packages, as the Git version lookup fails. So this needs to be patched. Perhaps a better way would be for dh_python3 to handle this by "teaching" use_scm_version to look at debian/changelog, as this would save 30+ packages having to continually update a setup.py patch. What do you think? Best wishes, Julian
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Stefano Rivera <stefanor@debian.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2022-02-06 18:00 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <DNT3j-3JU-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #13928 |
Hi Julian (2022.02.06_12:19:54_+0000) > In the couple of cases I've looked at so far, it is due to the > upstream version using use_scm_version in setup.py. This works fine > for a version that is in a Git repository, but it doesn't work for > Debian packages, as the Git version lookup fails. So this needs to be > patched. Or export SETUPTOOLS_SCM_PRETEND_VERSION. https://github.com/pypa/setuptools_scm#environment-variables pybuild does this for you. SR -- Stefano Rivera http://tumbleweed.org.za/ +1 415 683 3272
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sandro Tosi <morph@debian.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2022-02-06 21:40 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <DNWud-5SV-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #13929 |
> Or export SETUPTOOLS_SCM_PRETEND_VERSION. > https://github.com/pypa/setuptools_scm#environment-variables > > pybuild does this for you. i dont remember the exact details, but sometimes that doesnt work: even just building the source package (which runs dh clean, which invokes setup.py clean) the build fails because "something something SCM something". It could be the specific package is doing things in a funky way but that's my experience at least -- Sandro "morph" Tosi My website: http://sandrotosi.me/ Me at Debian: http://wiki.debian.org/SandroTosi Twitter: https://twitter.com/sandrotosi
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Julian Gilbey <jdg@debian.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2022-02-07 07:40 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <DO5Hb-79a-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #13929 |
On Sun, Feb 06, 2022 at 04:46:53PM +0000, Stefano Rivera wrote: > Hi Julian (2022.02.06_12:19:54_+0000) > > In the couple of cases I've looked at so far, it is due to the > > upstream version using use_scm_version in setup.py. This works fine > > for a version that is in a Git repository, but it doesn't work for > > Debian packages, as the Git version lookup fails. So this needs to be > > patched. > > Or export SETUPTOOLS_SCM_PRETEND_VERSION. > https://github.com/pypa/setuptools_scm#environment-variables > > pybuild does this for you. Hi Stefano, I'm a little confused by this. Have a look at https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1005039 against python3-iniconfig. It has a very straightforward debian/rules, using pybuild, and its setup.py script has "use_scm_version=True", but it still produces a python package with version number 0.0.0. I have tried this in an environment where I have python3-setuptools-scm installed, by the way (even though the package does not Build-Depends on it). I'm using dh-python version 5.20220119 Best wishes, Julian
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Stefano Rivera <stefanor@debian.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2022-02-08 01:30 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: Bug#1005043: lintian: check that Python version numbers are not 0.0.0 |
| Message-ID | <DOmyl-hh6-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #13931 |
Hi Julian (2022.02.07_06:26:38_+0000) > I'm a little confused by this. Have a look at > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1005039 against > python3-iniconfig. It has a very straightforward debian/rules, using > pybuild, and its setup.py script has "use_scm_version=True", but it > still produces a python package with version number 0.0.0. > > I have tried this in an environment where I have > python3-setuptools-scm installed, by the way (even though the package > does not Build-Depends on it). I'm using dh-python version 5.20220119 That's the issue, it *needs* to Build-Depend on that (pybuild only exports the PRETEND environment variable when there is a Build-Dependency). Committed a fix to git. SR -- Stefano Rivera http://tumbleweed.org.za/ +1 415 683 3272
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Julian Gilbey <julian@d-and-j.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2022-02-08 08:00 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: Bug#1005043: lintian: check that Python version numbers are not 0.0.0 |
| Message-ID | <DOsDL-lie-3@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #13933 |
On Tue, Feb 08, 2022 at 12:26:01AM +0000, Stefano Rivera wrote: > Hi Julian (2022.02.07_06:26:38_+0000) > > I'm a little confused by this. Have a look at > > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1005039 against > > python3-iniconfig. It has a very straightforward debian/rules, using > > pybuild, and its setup.py script has "use_scm_version=True", but it > > still produces a python package with version number 0.0.0. > > > > I have tried this in an environment where I have > > python3-setuptools-scm installed, by the way (even though the package > > does not Build-Depends on it). I'm using dh-python version 5.20220119 > > That's the issue, it *needs* to Build-Depend on that (pybuild only > exports the PRETEND environment variable when there is a > Build-Dependency). > > Committed a fix to git. Ah, thanks Stefano! Best wishes, Julian
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | linux.debian.maint.python
csiph-web