Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > linux.debian.maint.python > #13316 > unrolled thread

Requesting upload of proxmoxer 1.1.1-1 to unstable

Back to article view | Back to linux.debian.maint.python

Contents

  Requesting upload of proxmoxer 1.1.1-1 to unstable Lorenz Schori <lo@znerol.ch> - 2021-04-16 15:50 +0200
    Re: Requesting upload of proxmoxer 1.1.1-1 to unstable Andrey Rahmatullin <wrar@debian.org> - 2021-04-16 16:10 +0200
      Re: Requesting upload of proxmoxer 1.1.1-1 to unstable Lorenz Schori <lo@znerol.ch> - 2021-04-16 16:30 +0200
    Re: Requesting upload of proxmoxer 1.1.1-1 to unstable Elena ``of Valhalla'' Grandi <valhalla@debian.org> - 2021-04-17 09:10 +0200
      Re: Requesting upload of proxmoxer 1.1.1-1 to unstable Lorenz Schori <lo@znerol.ch> - 2021-04-17 13:30 +0200

#13316 — Requesting upload of proxmoxer 1.1.1-1 to unstable

Hi,

I updated proxmoxer to upstream 1.1.1 (latest stable release). I've
pushed debian/master, upstream and pristine-tar branches now to salsa.

I did a smoke test (debian/rules clean, debian/rules build,
debian/rules binary) and the result looks like a respectable debian
package.

The only thing left is "dch -r", release tagging and build, I guess.
@Elena would you mind taking a look if everything is okay and then
upload to unstable?

Cheers,
Lorenz

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#13317

[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw

On Fri, Apr 16, 2021 at 03:46:45PM +0200, Lorenz Schori wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> I updated proxmoxer to upstream 1.1.1 (latest stable release). I've
> pushed debian/master, upstream and pristine-tar branches now to salsa.
> 
> I did a smoke test (debian/rules clean, debian/rules build,
> debian/rules binary) and the result looks like a respectable debian
> package.
> 
> The only thing left is "dch -r", release tagging and build, I guess.
> @Elena would you mind taking a look if everything is okay and then
> upload to unstable?
We are frozen so nothing except targeted serious fixes should be uploaded
to unstable.

-- 
WBR, wRAR

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#13318

On Fri, 16 Apr 2021 19:04:20 +0500
Andrey Rahmatullin <wrar@debian.org> wrote:

> We are frozen so nothing except targeted serious fixes should be
> uploaded to unstable.

Right. Sorry, my bad.

Cheers,
Lorenz

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#13319

[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw

On 2021-04-16 at 15:46:45 +0200, Lorenz Schori wrote:
> I updated proxmoxer to upstream 1.1.1 (latest stable release). I've
> pushed debian/master, upstream and pristine-tar branches now to salsa.
> [....]

I've removed the UNRELEASED stanzas of d/changelog and collapsed them in
just one stanza for the release that is being updated: there is no need
to keep track in it of things that were never in debian.

There were also a few trivial lintian fixes, which I've done

> The only thing left is "dch -r", release tagging and build, I guess.
> @Elena would you mind taking a look if everything is okay and then
> upload to unstable?

s/unstable/experimental/ , since we're still in freeze

Sorry for the delay and thanks for your work

-- 
Elena ``of Valhalla''

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#13320

On Sat, 17 Apr 2021 09:01:34 +0200
Elena ``of Valhalla'' Grandi <valhalla@debian.org> wrote:

> thanks for your work

Thanks for your guidance. This is very much appreciated.

Cheers,
Lorenz

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Back to top | Article view | linux.debian.maint.python

csiph-web