Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.debian.maint.python > #13038 > unrolled thread

python3-(py)crypto(dome)?

Started byMartin <debacle@debian.org>
First post2020-12-05 14:50 +0100
Last post2020-12-05 18:40 +0100
Articles 4 — 2 participants

Back to article view | Back to linux.debian.maint.python


Contents

  python3-(py)crypto(dome)? Martin <debacle@debian.org> - 2020-12-05 14:50 +0100
    Re: python3-(py)crypto(dome)? Andrey Rahmatullin <wrar@debian.org> - 2020-12-05 16:00 +0100
      Re: python3-(py)crypto(dome)? Martin <debacle@debian.org> - 2020-12-05 18:30 +0100
        Re: python3-(py)crypto(dome)? Andrey Rahmatullin <wrar@debian.org> - 2020-12-05 18:40 +0100

#13038 — python3-(py)crypto(dome)?

FromMartin <debacle@debian.org>
Date2020-12-05 14:50 +0100
Subjectpython3-(py)crypto(dome)?
Message-ID<BiG6K-4vR-17@gated-at.bofh.it>
Dears,

I'm a little confused about what the correct name for the
binary package python3-pycryptodome should or will be.

Because https://bugs.debian.org/891619 talks about renaming it
and/or providing python3-crypto.

Package wokkel has changed the dependency from python3-crypto to
python3-cryptodome, leading to #975748 and #975770.

For now, I would upload wokkel with changed dependency, from
python3-cryptodome to python3-pycryptodome. Any objections?

Cheers

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]


#13039

FromAndrey Rahmatullin <wrar@debian.org>
Date2020-12-05 16:00 +0100
Message-ID<BiHcv-5vS-13@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#13038

[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw

On Sat, Dec 05, 2020 at 02:43:44PM +0100, Martin wrote:
> Dears,
> 
> I'm a little confused about what the correct name for the
> binary package python3-pycryptodome should or will be.
Depends on the module name it provides.
So python3-cryptodome, it seems.

> Because https://bugs.debian.org/891619 talks about renaming it
> and/or providing python3-crypto.
If it doesn't provide a "crypto" module it shouldn't be named
python3-crypto.
I don't know what did the reporter mean in their first message.

> Package wokkel has changed the dependency from python3-crypto to
> python3-cryptodome, leading to #975748 and #975770.
The changelog entry says "Switch to python3-pycryptodome" but the control
field says "python3-cryptodome". This is a bug in python3-wokkel,
unrelated to the initial question here.

-- 
WBR, wRAR

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#13040

FromMartin <debacle@debian.org>
Date2020-12-05 18:30 +0100
Message-ID<BiJxD-76p-7@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#13039
On 2020-12-05 19:51, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 05, 2020 at 02:43:44PM +0100, Martin wrote:
> > Package wokkel has changed the dependency from python3-crypto to
> > python3-cryptodome, leading to #975748 and #975770.
> The changelog entry says "Switch to python3-pycryptodome" but the control
> field says "python3-cryptodome". This is a bug in python3-wokkel,
> unrelated to the initial question here.

Related in the sense: If python3-pycryptodome would provide
python3-crypto, the old dependency were correct. If
python3-pycryptodome would be renamed to python3-cryptodome, the
current dependency were correct. The fix in wokkel should not
lead to a problem after the next upload of python3-pycryptodome.
Anyway, if nobody objects, I just upload the fixed wokkel.

Cheers

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#13041

FromAndrey Rahmatullin <wrar@debian.org>
Date2020-12-05 18:40 +0100
Message-ID<BiJHj-7ar-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#13040

[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw

On Sat, Dec 05, 2020 at 06:29:32PM +0100, Martin wrote:
> The fix in wokkel should not lead to a problem after the next upload of
> python3-pycryptodome.
I disagree. Currently wokkel clearly has a problem and it's most lilely a
typo. If python3-pycryptodome will be renamed to python3-cryptodome, that
will be a separate matter, and it will most likely be done via a
transition package so wokkel won't need a revert.


-- 
WBR, wRAR

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | linux.debian.maint.python


csiph-web