Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > linux.debian.maint.python > #12681 > unrolled thread

RE:Offer to help with packaging

Back to article view | Back to linux.debian.maint.python

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.

Contents

  RE:Offer to help with packaging PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel <frederic-emmanuel.picca@synchrotron-soleil.fr> - 2020-06-28 16:40 +0200
    Re: Offer to help with packaging Nicholas D Steeves <nsteeves@gmail.com> - 2020-07-02 04:00 +0200
      Re: Offer to help with packaging Emmanuel Arias <eamanu@yaerobi.com> - 2020-07-04 14:40 +0200
        Bug#963605: Offer to help with packaging Geert Stappers <stappers@stappers.nl> - 2020-07-05 18:10 +0200
          Bug#963605: Offer to help with packaging Geert Stappers <stappers@stappers.nl> - 2020-07-05 18:30 +0200
      Re: Offer to help with packaging Nicholas D Steeves <nsteeves@gmail.com> - 2020-07-04 20:10 +0200

#12681 — RE:Offer to help with packaging

What about helping 

https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=946035


python-language-server

is the only one missing now.

cheers

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#12707

[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw

Hi Pablo,

Pablo Mestre <pmdcuba@gmail.com> writes:

> Im working on python-language-server

Awesome, thank you :-)  I expect it will be a popular package too!

> but looks like also depends on python-jsonrpc-server and I dont find
> any solution on Debian repositories.
>
> Any suggestion?
>

If you're committed to packaging python lsp, then set yourself as the
owner of #96360, and retitle it, replacing "RFP" with "ITP".

If the absence of a python-jsonrpc-server package is a blocker for
#963605, and you want to work on it, then file an ITP for
python-jsonrpc-server, set yourself as owner, and also set up a blocks
relationship between the two bugs.

Tools for doing this more conveniently are "bts" from devscripts, and
"reportbug" for filing the ITP.  IIRC bts requires an MTA (mail
transport agent) and for this I'd recommend msmtp-mta, because most
people find it easier to configure authentication with it than with
Postfix, Exim, etc.

If you'd like to do it manually for now, see:
  https://www.debian.org/Bugs/server-control

If you use control@bugs.debian.org, please CC the bug's email.

It's also possible to reply to a bug with this magic control server
header:

  Control: command -1 arguments

"-1" is a convenient alias for the bug number.  For more info, see the
man bts(1), the server-control documentation, and Developer's Reference:

  https://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/developers-reference/


Cheers,
Nicholas

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#12711

[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw

Hi,


On Thu, Jul 2, 2020 at 12:48 AM Pablo Mestre <pmdcuba@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi
>
> El 7/1/20 a las 10:58 PM, Nicholas D Steeves escribió:
> > Awesome, thank you :-) I expect it will be a popular package too!
> [.....]
> > If you're committed to packaging python lsp, then set yourself as the
> > owner of #96360, and retitle it, replacing "RFP" with "ITP".
> Yes, I committed to packaging
> > If the absence of a python-jsonrpc-server package is a blocker for
> > #963605, and you want to work on it, then file an ITP for
> > python-jsonrpc-server, set yourself as owner, and also set up a blocks
> > relationship between the two bugs.
>
> You mean
>
> Control: block 946035 by -1
> Control: block #[newcode] by -1
>
> Something like this?
>

yes go ahead.

I don't see the ITP for python-jsonrpc-server. Do you need some help?

Cheers,
Emmanuel

>
> >
> > Tools for doing this more conveniently are "bts" from devscripts, and
> > "reportbug" for filing the ITP.  IIRC bts requires an MTA (mail
> > transport agent) and for this I'd recommend msmtp-mta, because most
> > people find it easier to configure authentication with it than with
> > Postfix, Exim, etc.
> >
> > If you'd like to do it manually for now, see:
> >   https://www.debian.org/Bugs/server-control
>
> Ok
>
> Thanks for all
>
> P.
>
>
>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#12717 — Bug#963605: Offer to help with packaging

Control: retitle -1 RFP: python-language-server -- Python implementation of the Language Server Protocol
Control: owner -1 Pablo Mestre <pmdcuba@gmail.com>
Control: subscribe -1

On Sat, Jul 04, 2020 at 09:29:36AM -0300, Emmanuel Arias wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> 
> On Thu, Jul 2, 2020 at 12:48 AM Pablo Mestre <pmdcuba@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> > Hi
> >
> > El 7/1/20 a las 10:58 PM, Nicholas D Steeves escribió:
> > > Awesome, thank you :-) I expect it will be a popular package too!
> > [.....]
> > > If you're committed to packaging python lsp, then set yourself as the
> > > owner of #96360, and retitle it, replacing "RFP" with "ITP".
> > Yes, I committed to packaging
> > > If the absence of a python-jsonrpc-server package is a blocker for
> > > #963605, and you want to work on it, then file an ITP for
> > > python-jsonrpc-server, set yourself as owner, and also set up a blocks
> > > relationship between the two bugs.
> >
> > You mean
> >
> > Control: block 946035 by -1
> > Control: block #[newcode] by -1
> >
> > Something like this?
> >
> 
> yes go ahead.
> 
> I don't see the ITP for python-jsonrpc-server. Do you need some help?
> 

I felt the need to show how to do it.



> > >
> > > Tools for doing this more conveniently are "bts" from devscripts, and
> > > "reportbug" for filing the ITP.  IIRC bts requires an MTA (mail
> > > transport agent) and for this I'd recommend msmtp-mta, because most
> > > people find it easier to configure authentication with it than with
> > > Postfix, Exim, etc.
> > >
> > > If you'd like to do it manually for now, see:
> > >   https://www.debian.org/Bugs/server-control
> >
> > Ok
> >
> > Thanks for all
> >
> > P.
> >

@Pablo 

My intension is to help.
I'm aware you didn't asked for the BTS update I did.

Do know that the Bug Tracking System information on #963605
can be easily updated again.


Regards
Geert Stappers
-- 
Silence is hard to parse

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#12718 — Bug#963605: Offer to help with packaging

Control: retitle -1 ITP: python-language-server -- Python implementation of the Language Server Protocol

On Sun, Jul 05, 2020 at 05:55:58PM +0200, Geert Stappers wrote:
> Control: retitle -1 RFP: python-language-server -- Python implementation of the Language Server Protocol

Oops.

Copy and paste error now fixed.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#12712

[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw

Hi Pablo,

Pablo Mestre <pmdcuba@gmail.com> writes:

> El 7/1/20 a las 10:58 PM, Nicholas D Steeves escribió:
>> Awesome, thank you :-) I expect it will be a popular package too! 
> [.....]
>> If you're committed to packaging python lsp, then set yourself as the
>> owner of #96360[5], and retitle it, replacing "RFP" with "ITP".
> Yes, I committed to packaging
>> If the absence of a python-jsonrpc-server package is a blocker for
>> #963605, and you want to work on it, then file an ITP for
>> python-jsonrpc-server, set yourself as owner, and also set up a blocks
>> relationship between the two bugs.
>
> You mean
>
> Control: block 946035 by -1

This blocks the spyder bug with the new bug, and is generally used
from the email that creates a new bug.  Hint: #963605 contains an example


Cheers,
Nicholas

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Back to top | Article view | linux.debian.maint.python

csiph-web