Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.maint.python > #12133
| Path | csiph.com!news.dns-netz.com!news.freedyn.net!aioe.org!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod |
|---|---|
| From | Julien Puydt <julien.puydt@laposte.net> |
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.maint.python |
| Subject | Re: small remark on packaging consistency |
| Date | Tue, 10 Dec 2019 23:00:02 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <zbVHY-1hm-11@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <zbUsx-v9-7@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| X-Original-To | debian-python@lists.debian.org |
| X-Mailbox-Line | From debian-python-request@lists.debian.org Tue Dec 10 21:50:37 2019 |
| Old-Return-Path | <julien.puydt@laposte.net> |
| X-Amavis-Spam-Status | No, score=-5.441 tagged_above=-10000 required=5.3 tests=[BAYES_00=-2, DIGITS_LETTERS=1, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FOURLA=0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, LDO_WHITELIST=-5, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SARE_FREE_WEBM_LAPOSTE=0.721, SARE_MSGID_LONG40=0.637] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no |
| X-Policyd-Weight | using cached result; rate: -4.7 |
| X-Greylist | delayed 1524 seconds by postgrey-1.36 at bendel; Tue, 10 Dec 2019 21:50:26 UTC |
| Dkim-Signature | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=laposte.net; s=mail0; t=1576013099; bh=d94ksU6+vBPXhQNMdA0ICIOci/PXRBv5mGIJpaI7DjI=; h=Subject:From:To:Date:In-Reply-To:References; b=bhZWhNCId7zWbk1788+CmiogPQUZNGprEd9brhrkHbDc7G2pFOuCaTaVuV4zO+0qb +wEetBJGqSL1wYAYSNAJk/dj1D87Ai2PwY2aykkNVOVhovEGYw/HJrBOCirZJ4/BPl 1OfZclWOUl087bgQP/gonvOdEcq4L3+UGVyNFkIAXCw1bFPanLN1rkZvWdwfEvS6tQ nkYv3M8PPzppgGb/I3GbLlPRDAC5pcylv5GpJs+iLPBlpdQnFaf0zcu1mhlfdAe29J wVm3saZlTZWIqYn7lwlx+f+6sIglWj0jZNyTN5rfukdv/W4GQVGR3FgmtFCkuBXlKd FF5vy/hKLb/Mw== |
| Content-Type | text/plain; charset="UTF-8" |
| User-Agent | Evolution 3.34.1-2+b1 |
| MIME-Version | 1.0 |
| Content-Transfer-Encoding | 8bit |
| X-Vr-Cause-1 | gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedufedrudelfedgudegjecutefuodetggdotefrodftvfcurfhr |
| X-Vr-Cause-2 | ohhfihhlvgemucfntefrqffuvffgnecuuegrihhlohhuthemucehtddtnecunecujfgurhepkffuhffv |
| X-Vr-Cause-3 | ffgjfhgtfggggfesthekredttderjeenucfhrhhomheplfhulhhivghnucfruhihughtuceojhhulhhi |
| X-Vr-Cause-4 | vghnrdhpuhihughtsehlrghpohhsthgvrdhnvghtqeenucfkphepkedvrddvfeeirddugeelrdeivden |
| X-Vr-Cause-5 | ucfrrghrrghmpehmohguvgepshhmthhpohhuthdpihhnvghtpeekvddrvdefiedrudegledriedvpdhh |
| X-Vr-Cause-6 | vghlohepphhhrggvrhhishdrlhhotggrlhguohhmrghinhdpmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpehjuhhlihgvnhdr |
| X-Vr-Cause-7 | phhuhigutheslhgrphhoshhtvgdrnhgvthdprhgtphhtthhopeguvggsihgrnhdqphihthhhohhnsehl |
| X-Vr-Cause-8 | ihhsthhsrdguvggsihgrnhdrohhrghenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedt |
| X-Vr-Avstate | No |
| X-Mailing-List | <debian-python@lists.debian.org> archive/latest/17729 |
| List-ID | <debian-python.lists.debian.org> |
| List-URL | <https://lists.debian.org/debian-python/> |
| List-Archive | https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/68bfe6689cae779c7658fbc49be3d4b9cfec11b0.camel@laposte.net |
| Approved | robomod@news.nic.it |
| Lines | 55 |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
| Sender | robomod@news.nic.it |
| X-Original-Date | Tue, 10 Dec 2019 22:24:58 +0100 |
| X-Original-Message-ID | <68bfe6689cae779c7658fbc49be3d4b9cfec11b0.camel@laposte.net> |
| X-Original-References | <6be3a3078564e688f954fe4a50e0b674603b3f6e.camel@orange.fr> |
| Xref | csiph.com linux.debian.maint.python:12133 |
Show key headers only | View raw
Hi, Le mardi 10 décembre 2019 à 21:08 +0100, Patrice Duroux a écrit : > Two tiny remarks related to the recent python3-testpath upgrade to > 0.4.4+dfsg-1. Oops! I did it again? > 1. Two open bugs were almost the same (or at least to me): > > #945214 assigned to python3-pip and reassigned to python3-testpath on > Sun, 08 > Dec 2019 12:45:05 GMT > > and > > #945887 assigned to jupyter-notebook and reassigned to python3- > testpath on Sat, > 30 Nov 2019 16:42:02 GMT > > But why it was only the first that was closed with the last upgrade? Well, I sent the merging mail, but didn't get the answer that they couldn't be merged (differing severity) before I actually uploaded, so I marked it fixed in this version later. > 2. Also regarding this bug why still using some d/rules treatment > using an extra > debian template file to generate an .egg-info file while the upstream > version is > now providing a PKG-INFO file that is actually not part of the Debian > salsa > repository for this package? I just unbroke what was there, and didn't look further. This PKG-INFO file doesn't appear in the salsa repo for the Debian packaging because it doesn't appear in upstream's tarball (git import- orig --uscan), and I just had a look and didn't see it in upstream's github repo either. Or did I miss it? > Other DMPT packages do not seem to do the same to generate and > provide this .egg-info file. I have now looked further : "git blame" says Ximin Luo added it (commit ab9d454b) and the documented reason is: "Add an .egg-info file so pip recognises it. (Closes: #880241)" ; so it looks like there was a valid reason and it's a nice contribution... If there's something to do to improve the packaging, I'm open to suggestions (and contributions!). Cheers, JP
Back to linux.debian.maint.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
small remark on packaging consistency Patrice Duroux <duroux.patrice@orange.fr> - 2019-12-10 21:40 +0100
Re: small remark on packaging consistency Julien Puydt <julien.puydt@laposte.net> - 2019-12-10 23:00 +0100
Re: Re: small remark on packaging consistency Patrice Duroux <duroux.patrice@orange.fr> - 2019-12-11 20:30 +0100
Re: Re: small remark on packaging consistency Julien Puydt <julien.puydt@laposte.net> - 2019-12-11 21:40 +0100
csiph-web