Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.maint.python > #12336
| From | peter green <plugwash@p10link.net> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.devel, linux.debian.bugs.dist, linux.debian.maint.python, linux.debian.devel.release |
| Subject | re: git-buildpackage to be autoremoved due to python2 transition |
| Date | 2020-02-27 23:10 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <zEzmi-Y9-7@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
Cross-posted to 4 groups.
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw
> Relevant packages and bugs: > 943107 git-buildpackage: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye This bug is not marked as rc. Nevertheless I believe that this bug report is in-fact a false positive. From what I can tell git-buildpackage, even in buster, does not (build-)depend on python 2 or any python 2 modules. It does build-depend on python-pydoctor, but according to a recently entry in the pydoctor changelog that package "is a Python application and not used as a module" It would make sense to change the build-dependency to pydoctor in the next upload, but it's probablly not worth making an upload just for that change. > 937132 nevow: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye Depended on by pydoctor in testing, but not in unstable. Should stop being a problem for git-buildpackage when pydoctor migrates. > 938622 tahoe-lafs: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye Listed as a "blocker" of the above bug but not currently in testing. Personally I advocate ignoring "blockers" that are not in testing, but I'm not sure if consensus has been reached on that. > > Bugs which you may notice which are now not so relevant any more > because they have been fixed in sid (but not yet migrated): > 950216 [git-buildpackage] missing xsltproc autopkg test dependency > Fixed in sid; migration blocked by FTBFS due to pydoctor > breakage (#949232). When pydoctor has migrated, reattempting > build (eg by re-upload) should fix this. Builds happen in unstable, so there is no need to wait for pydoctor to migrate to testing before retrying the build. I just requested a retry and the package built succesfully. I'd expect it to migrate as soon as dak and britney process the binary. > 949232/948831 [pydoctor] needs to depend on cachecontrol > 952546 [pydoctor] d/copyright & DFSG issues > 937421 [pydoctor] Python2 removal in sid/bullseye Should hopefully be fixed in a few days when pydoctor migrates to testing, i'm not seeing any obvious blockers for that right now.
Back to linux.debian.maint.python | Previous | Next — Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
re: git-buildpackage to be autoremoved due to python2 transition peter green <plugwash@p10link.net> - 2020-02-27 23:10 +0100 re: git-buildpackage to be autoremoved due to python2 transition Johannes Schauer <josch@debian.org> - 2020-02-28 05:40 +0100
csiph-web