Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.debian.maint.python > #12086

Re: Any reason why python-scipy version 1.3.1 remains in experimental?

Path csiph.com!aioe.org!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod
From Graham Inggs <ginggs@debian.org>
Newsgroups linux.debian.maint.python
Subject Re: Any reason why python-scipy version 1.3.1 remains in experimental?
Date Mon, 02 Dec 2019 07:10:01 +0100
Message-ID <z8N4d-57Z-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <z8Cit-6xj-5@gated-at.bofh.it>
X-Original-To Andreas Tille <andreas@an3as.eu>
X-Mailbox-Line From debian-python-request@lists.debian.org Mon Dec 2 06:05:13 2019
Old-Return-Path <ginggs@debian.org>
X-Amavis-Spam-Status No, score=-7.7 tagged_above=-10000 required=5.3 tests=[BAYES_00=-2, LDO_WHITELIST=-5, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
X-Policyd-Weight using cached result; rate: -4.6
X-Riseup-User-ID 72FDB31C59E1B873372FAC470B4AAFC09D74658C99D655CEDA8A6DBCCB3EB8EA
X-Gm-Message-State APjAAAVy3VwuaWeSe/c6dlViJ3+B/1pbunUy9+hG3yf6/9H8cKXdQgQW u7b9POU5JfMod+Dr8GhztPgCfpjhA7aUwmJ0LxM=
X-Google-SMTP-Source APXvYqw7Te5cvARv20rHQJOdSq+LPijeTHYquR2AnzFR957gQKuKUzJO4jIzoW91OttEVgxecjvPGszasqIQ2OY1908=
X-Received by 2002:ab0:26cd:: with SMTP id b13mr16127006uap.44.1575266697392; Sun, 01 Dec 2019 22:04:57 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version 1.0
X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID <CAM8zJQvLtFqH0cRujtM457siwTEOW4mfn-e9kEGPK73O4mjTaA@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
X-Mailing-List <debian-python@lists.debian.org> archive/latest/17682
List-ID <debian-python.lists.debian.org>
List-URL <https://lists.debian.org/debian-python/>
List-Archive https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/CAM8zJQvLtFqH0cRujtM457siwTEOW4mfn-e9kEGPK73O4mjTaA@mail.gmail.com
Approved robomod@news.nic.it
Lines 16
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway
Sender robomod@news.nic.it
X-Original-Cc Debian Python Modules Team <python-modules-team@lists.alioth.debian.org>, Debian Python <debian-python@lists.debian.org>
X-Original-Date Mon, 2 Dec 2019 08:05:47 +0200
X-Original-Message-ID <CAM8zJQvLtFqH0cRujtM457siwTEOW4mfn-e9kEGPK73O4mjTaA@mail.gmail.com>
X-Original-References <20191201183637.GB1945@an3as.eu>
Xref csiph.com linux.debian.maint.python:12086

Show key headers only | View raw


Hi Andreas

On Sun, 1 Dec 2019 at 20:36, Andreas Tille <andreas@an3as.eu> wrote:
> according to the answer to an issue I opened agains scikit-bio[1] the
> test suite would work with scipy version 1.3.1.  I wonder what might be
> the reason to stick to version 1.2.2 instaed of upgrading to the version
> in experimental.  In case this situation would not change in the next
> weeks I'd consider to simply deactivate the said test.

scipy 1.3.3-1 is NEW since 2019-11-27 [1]

Regards
Graham


[1] https://ftp-master.debian.org/new/scipy_1.3.3-1.html

Back to linux.debian.maint.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Any reason why python-scipy version 1.3.1 remains in experimental? Andreas Tille <andreas@an3as.eu> - 2019-12-01 19:40 +0100
  Any reason why python-scipy version 1.3.1 remains in experimental? "Rebecca N. Palmer" <rebecca_palmer@zoho.com> - 2019-12-01 23:30 +0100
  Re: Any reason why python-scipy version 1.3.1 remains in experimental? Graham Inggs <ginggs@debian.org> - 2019-12-02 07:10 +0100

csiph-web