Groups > linux.debian.maint.python > #12085

Any reason why python-scipy version 1.3.1 remains in experimental?

Path	csiph.com!2.eu.feeder.erje.net!3.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!weretis.net!feeder7.news.weretis.net!news.mixmin.net!aioe.org!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod
From	"Rebecca N. Palmer" <rebecca_palmer@zoho.com>
Newsgroups	linux.debian.maint.python
Subject	Any reason why python-scipy version 1.3.1 remains in experimental?
Date	Sun, 01 Dec 2019 23:30:02 +0100
Message-ID	<z8FT4-mH-9@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References	<z8Cit-6xj-5@gated-at.bofh.it>
X-Mailbox-Line	From debian-python-request@lists.debian.org Sun Dec 1 22:27:08 2019
Old-Return-Path	<rebecca_palmer@zoho.com>
X-Amavis-Spam-Status	No, score=-7.199 tagged_above=-10000 required=5.3 tests=[BAYES_00=-2, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, LDO_WHITELIST=-5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
X-Policyd-Weight	using cached result; rate: -5.5
Arc-Seal	i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1575238251; cv=none; d=zohomail.com; s=zohoarc; b=izC9++d0q1cqxsGON5LD/rKeBx9VicLDOePliKXxqhrX4G/Y80n8sw25lFurdMHJm6G3WXXwYjh87jRo5XzJGyxPWcjP92Dor/HA+iNgd2T67GhSTYOZL949j5fEQBy3UciLEY4xUiM2+miU3b5pXJahBTleofH+E7ut1LtUGvM=
Arc-Message-Signature	i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=zohomail.com; s=zohoarc; t=1575238251; h=Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Date:From:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Message-ID:Subject:To; bh=t62MTgldJnkRuJWhBDailM8jN+HHHFaw7+IcYrw/jH0=; b=WiS7KcsvTM56Z6TYedYRx+ZQtHBTUtrwBmx51QQn8dknj0/scDjFrW6FTddgSVyhv7NXEshzDgyMLb1i6CZd/FtcWGyftPNtXqOZiWb+EvBu9BVlp/loohDVU9pTYnitGSNJ4NbzUWQd6uh/dWiM48MHYtz7TrYQYupCUhdoTTY=
Arc-Authentication-Results	i=1; mx.zohomail.com; dkim=pass header.i=zoho.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=rebecca_palmer@zoho.com; dmarc=pass header.from=<rebecca_palmer@zoho.com> header.from=<rebecca_palmer@zoho.com>
Domainkey-Signature	a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=zapps768; d=zoho.com; h=in-reply-to:to:from:subject:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version:content-type; b=UzWCT2pM6kGdL+yiZwb6EsZwPxjBwUvgUWUOWdDyMlnvfrMCiztK9oxt5+Sz9Wc9XANyzboHZwIT tl8j2t6XWACnu17UR8ik7vSKd+qNp1iptw/gMXZZiYjLbOoib3oX
Dkim-Signature	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1575238251; s=zm2019; d=zoho.com; i=rebecca_palmer@zoho.com; h=In-Reply-To:To:From:Subject:Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; bh=t62MTgldJnkRuJWhBDailM8jN+HHHFaw7+IcYrw/jH0=; b=E7WivVh0H39LJ7V4737EwtrLE/LvHDJpLiTtlwLmZLQ9bhSkh683o+G+3xMq+DED iOdDYQcjBvPlZ70NyogJfBkAFeGI5HPFOHWSd+L8Q4H8XxQsmv8BXGDoO4sJl2fxnE7 aX+rcGLS1wuXPiEAX7lg5zywNEfjB/Qyt1CJNsoM=
User-Agent	Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.2.2
MIME-Version	1.0
Content-Type	text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Language	en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding	7bit
X-Zohomailclient	External
X-Mailing-List	<debian-python@lists.debian.org> archive/latest/17681
List-ID	<debian-python.lists.debian.org>
List-URL	<https://lists.debian.org/debian-python/>
List-Archive	https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/7c6d89a2-503d-cd02-5e88-561940fb896f@zoho.com
Approved	robomod@news.nic.it
Lines	4
Organization	linux.* mail to news gateway
Sender	robomod@news.nic.it
X-Original-Date	Sun, 1 Dec 2019 22:10:41 +0000
X-Original-Message-ID	<7c6d89a2-503d-cd02-5e88-561940fb896f@zoho.com>
X-Original-References	<20191201183637.GB1945@an3as.eu>
Xref	csiph.com linux.debian.maint.python:12085

Show key headers only | View raw

There are a few other autopkgtest regressions with scipy 1.3, though I 
don't know if they're the reason:

https://release.debian.org/britney/pseudo-excuses-experimental.html

Thread

Any reason why python-scipy version 1.3.1 remains in experimental? Andreas Tille <andreas@an3as.eu> - 2019-12-01 19:40 +0100
  Any reason why python-scipy version 1.3.1 remains in experimental? "Rebecca N. Palmer" <rebecca_palmer@zoho.com> - 2019-12-01 23:30 +0100
  Re: Any reason why python-scipy version 1.3.1 remains in experimental? Graham Inggs <ginggs@debian.org> - 2019-12-02 07:10 +0100

csiph-web