Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.debian.maint.python > #11570

Bug#934398: RM: beanstalkc -- ROM; no Python 3 subpackage and no reverse deps

Path csiph.com!aioe.org!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod
From Ondrej Novy <novy@ondrej.org>
Newsgroups linux.debian.bugs.dist, linux.debian.maint.python
Subject Bug#934398: RM: beanstalkc -- ROM; no Python 3 subpackage and no reverse deps
Date Mon, 12 Aug 2019 08:00:02 +0200
Message-ID <yubx8-cg-5@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <ytCSJ-2q2-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <ytQ9j-3Ix-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <ytCSJ-2q2-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <ytQ9j-3Ix-7@gated-at.bofh.it>
X-Mailbox-Line From debian-bugs-dist-request@lists.debian.org Mon Aug 12 05:51:08 2019
Old-Return-Path <debbugs@buxtehude.debian.org>
X-Spam-Flag NO
X-Spam-Score -3.75
Reply-To Ondrej Novy <novy@ondrej.org>, 934398@bugs.debian.org
Resent-To debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org
Resent-Cc Debian FTP Master <ftpmaster@ftp-master.debian.org>
X-Debian-Pr-Message followup 934398
X-Debian-Pr-Package ftp.debian.org
X-Spam-Bayes score:0.0000 Tokens: new, 10; hammy, 135; neutral, 51; spammy, 0. spammytokens: hammytokens:0.000-+--X-Debbugs-Cc, 0.000-+--XDebbugsCc, 0.000-+--Nový, 0.000-+--ondej, 0.000-+--ondřej
Dkim-Signature v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ondrej-org.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=aCe8ZVutjGSt4omXl/yYFFbxsG0uUlh2bdx9/8tlp0g=; b=bAYOp40LxJg27ao6cYFm2INZTdK7Ksv/G+ParXKvUHzlBQoUfSzCb7XffdAx6mQfcW KibskBfevHFO1LQYNXLGny6ROxC4YNq6h6A+BVLxcmn9CfdT3HyTUs4C0BIS0EmOHD3w VoyrSW/+5ApArd6Faq6DYS7cW3n2BtJmsp/89DMFRDG9/Dz+T8b0FpuQLnlNFOf+ioWy XmT8NLMXdo9A/GumLqTR5huVd7SCFaEVZvAXTGNecaadWpZYrZw2mTyWkc3Vz28CN0mn GoGuqha26l2is+Mm4Y3oZY+cJOTmo4LYrj7O4wSXfPSOrgoG8tPRqzYMzCzeNuvwo/kQ U8+w==
X-Google-Dkim-Signature v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=aCe8ZVutjGSt4omXl/yYFFbxsG0uUlh2bdx9/8tlp0g=; b=Wtvf0cCOnliRJ9aHfSXc18ar/LoroCU19VK5uktuCWPueDIjzXs16GWIVCqe9FgQGU rsOvgbIbSv1CQ+K8d8x6qv0779G7zhD1P1iV1alrnhp5LjwWDxrJLqCvKJIV/elZ9Lbp gaZxTUscw2+dg94U3SJ6uZEsBhq9AkF+CMq3NqE18XfUeMcBJkLx6v+UYfyLrB6+Rb/n q8fzYl7K7gTuLwl9WJe9fu/Sij7eGU4ScZuPB/2Zh6K9yNLA1a7+KoVpFiJA6lnVRu07 ARZ9HTWM0TgfM7pGbFFeZuki0xz/a4+W3MwSUvHmD+dbIBBw8ApJ/0HPjw95ywqk4Ao3 rwxw==
X-Gm-Message-State APjAAAVy6ZvtYBh1L5L/If6mGYrV9bP53oKFuBR9tFJxT2F8pvWrB9Df WJB/D9x+9P/v7ljRIPs7Sdl/dDsuRZQOLVnhY9U=
X-Google-SMTP-Source APXvYqwWq/PZdqIv73uCqSGtHyJQIj52knSq6UzUKrxmauqivsJzrfe56Q4SikiA0j79LZ6ozsWd5dMZK2vr6mfc79Q=
X-Received by 2002:ab0:7442:: with SMTP id p2mr19097323uaq.92.1565589001445; Sun, 11 Aug 2019 22:50:01 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version 1.0
Content-Type multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000004ba6c6058fe51834"
X-Debian-Message from BTS
X-Mailing-List <debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org> archive/latest/1551410
List-ID <debian-bugs-dist.lists.debian.org>
List-URL <https://lists.debian.org/debian-bugs-dist/>
Approved robomod@news.nic.it
Lines 78
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway
Sender robomod@news.nic.it
X-Original-Date Mon, 12 Aug 2019 07:49:50 +0200
X-Original-Message-ID <CAOO6c=xJnJqzf3fhfDjojUMZD=Ajt0ceesMZSpr=9uVQqXp2pw@mail.gmail.com>
X-Original-References <156545603334.18785.4178361337728025108.reportbug@belkar.wrar.name> <20190811065720.GA11255@marvin.dmesg.gr> <156545603334.18785.4178361337728025108.reportbug@belkar.wrar.name> <20190811065720.GA11255@marvin.dmesg.gr>
Xref csiph.com linux.debian.bugs.dist:969326 linux.debian.maint.python:11570

Cross-posted to 2 groups.

Show key headers only | View raw


[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw

Hi,

first of all I would like to say thanks to Andrey. He is hard working to
remove Python 2 from Debian. It's not easy job.

ne 11. 8. 2019 v 9:24 odesílatel Apollon Oikonomopoulos <apoikos@debian.org>
napsal:

> While I understand the urge to get Python 2 out of bullseye as early as
> possible, I don't feel happy about how this particular case was handled,
> and I notice that it is not in agreement with what was posted on
> debian-python[1].
>

it was. Cite:

DPMT / PAPT
===========
No need to wait for a bug report. If you have a leaf package, remove it now.

If you're not a DD, do it in the git repo and ping Piotr.

beanstalkc was team leaf package without reverse {build-,}depends.

 - X-Debbugs-Cc beanstalkc@packages.debian.org at bug report time,
>    as finding out at the time of *removal* is arguably too late.
>

yes, this make sense.

Thanks.

-- 
Best regards
 Ondřej Nový

Back to linux.debian.maint.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Bug#934398: RM: beanstalkc -- ROM; no Python 3 subpackage and no reverse deps Apollon Oikonomopoulos <apoikos@debian.org> - 2019-08-11 09:10 +0200
  Bug#934398: RM: beanstalkc -- ROM; no Python 3 subpackage and no reverse deps Ondrej Novy <novy@ondrej.org> - 2019-08-12 08:00 +0200
    Bug#934398: RM: beanstalkc -- ROM; no Python 3 subpackage and no reverse deps Apollon Oikonomopoulos <apoikos@debian.org> - 2019-08-16 11:10 +0200

csiph-web