Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.maint.python > #11980
| Path | csiph.com!aioe.org!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod |
|---|---|
| From | Ansgar <ansgar@43-1.org> |
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.maint.python |
| Subject | Re: Python module packages that don't bytecompile on installation? |
| Date | Mon, 04 Nov 2019 09:10:01 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <yYFAZ-6wu-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <yXSgV-18y-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <yXYw1-57g-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <yYcSl-5mr-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| X-Original-To | Paul Wise <pabs@debian.org> |
| X-Mailbox-Line | From debian-python-request@lists.debian.org Mon Nov 4 08:04:17 2019 |
| Old-Return-Path | <ansgar@debian.org> |
| X-Amavis-Spam-Status | No, score=-9.151 tagged_above=-10000 required=5.3 tests=[BAYES_00=-2, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, LDO_WHITELIST=-5, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no |
| X-Policyd-Weight | using cached result; rate: -3.5 |
| Dkim-Signature | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=43-1.org; i=@43-1.org; q=dns/txt; s=2019; t=1572854644; h=from : to : cc : subject : references : date : in-reply-to : message-id : mime-version : content-type : from; bh=eqkIfN5bTYD3aSQrIGDAPU1bt/N5Mp6VwLvIZsQR2so=; b=GpQORZ7TNt8e8Dx418uKWT1mbV5PQi8QdA2OfWE23SFwZHa/ZhJo0t4j nKSbnQoUAwhZVzAvfHbbbXULlxdxHReyYgOMWzFYetuGjtUHoGrptpFgX2 aWNQWoHlNQCku2zrDMP4JH9MIcxO4XrOidq8sxs2uSqExHBKR/pC+V/vqs 6dUsYqD9DCZdDCGnhEzCd+ebzae/KOUiZqGM28Jzn96I2Qp7Ku+T0L+XUG 93/+08hXQLi4YfT8OzSRokPU1lHQ1BQKx0OYE8FgUJDtvY5RQkg0fmZRGc WB0MNtKTRSYrZKPRq00CTIotKTQvQ5s5lwROrRRQ5leFL7mvvpqa+w== |
| User-Agent | Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.1 (gnu/linux) |
| MIME-Version | 1.0 |
| Content-Type | text/plain |
| X-Mailing-List | <debian-python@lists.debian.org> archive/latest/17546 |
| List-ID | <debian-python.lists.debian.org> |
| List-URL | <https://lists.debian.org/debian-python/> |
| List-Archive | https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/878sow130s.fsf@43-1.org |
| Approved | robomod@news.nic.it |
| Lines | 22 |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
| Sender | robomod@news.nic.it |
| X-Original-Cc | debian-python@lists.debian.org |
| X-Original-Date | Mon, 04 Nov 2019 09:04:03 +0100 |
| X-Original-Message-ID | <878sow130s.fsf@43-1.org> |
| X-Original-References | <4b0d37a23b7e605d68d079b56c7d45a64f188a20.camel@debian.org> <6175e6d8-7bb0-fec9-58b1-ca2ac22b1b12@debian.org> <CAKTje6FALGctqpn6+M2FNE8NnRt+qLO_CFKAt8-UBVcf0p64gw@mail.gmail.com> |
| Xref | csiph.com linux.debian.maint.python:11980 |
Show key headers only | View raw
Paul Wise writes: > On Sat, Nov 2, 2019 at 6:04 PM Matthias Klose wrote: >> I'd say, there are currently more pressing issues than that, like the Python2 >> removal, or the introduction of Python 3.8. 3.8 also offers a central directory >> for bc files, so that's maybe another thing to look at, but not a priority now >> from my point of view. > > Agreed re Python 2 etc. Eventually switching to using a central > directory in /var would be nice, right now the .pyc files are dumped > cruftily into /usr subdirs. But /var is for variable state data, i.e. data that is modified during regular system operation. This isn't the case for *.pyc which follow the same rules as the *.py included directly in the packages. So these files should stay in /usr. (I even think /var/lib/dpkg/info should really be in /usr for similar reasons.) See also http://0pointer.net/blog/projects/stateless.html for some other reasons why not using /var might be an advantage. Ansgar
Back to linux.debian.maint.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Python module packages that don't bytecompile on installation? Paul Wise <pabs@debian.org> - 2019-11-02 04:30 +0100
Re: Python module packages that don't bytecompile on installation? Matthias Klose <doko@debian.org> - 2019-11-02 11:10 +0100
Re: Python module packages that don't bytecompile on installation? Paul Wise <pabs@debian.org> - 2019-11-03 02:30 +0100
Re: Python module packages that don't bytecompile on installation? Matthias Klose <doko@debian.org> - 2019-11-03 10:30 +0100
Re: Python module packages that don't bytecompile on installation? Ansgar <ansgar@43-1.org> - 2019-11-04 09:10 +0100
csiph-web