Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.maint.python > #11942
| Path | csiph.com!aioe.org!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod |
|---|---|
| From | Ondrej Novy <novy@ondrej.org> |
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.maint.python |
| Subject | Re: Discussing next steps for the Python2 removal |
| Date | Fri, 25 Oct 2019 13:00:02 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <yV5u2-9r-3@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <yUWK5-2Yf-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <yV1Tr-6sS-11@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| X-Mailbox-Line | From debian-python-request@lists.debian.org Fri Oct 25 10:54:19 2019 |
| Old-Return-Path | <ondrej.novy@gmail.com> |
| X-Amavis-Spam-Status | No, score=-4.749 tagged_above=-10000 required=5.3 tests=[BAYES_00=-2, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.001, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, HTML_MESSAGE=2, LDO_WHITELIST=-5, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no |
| X-Policyd-Weight | using cached result; rate: -5.5 |
| Dkim-Signature | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ondrej-org.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=fH2eH7wQsFOmwHrokvwFoi0B8sxedTIsQGpwkVv4SBM=; b=1ZE/AMdQtFgSaFpWYIHp6zwsh7cO5AyuMnAcaOsvqAnBCIlGEolIvB3YP/V/iw/0Mq 4umuVnpVnE+3j2z7tVq9HnfKB6LLGn+NWq8DQAcubKY0KnhDnG1GQwGLVp9JBgXNr+dJ SsffnF7MVtfSkfxGHR2NQ/aVPmh6jGtQvHp1JfKHv2PpMbsZ6CN8qgKG6s/rP7tTzYpc UVUNvRGmHVJ/fu/SOnD7tcqMBQaQV4U/yq2ipFnmy02GdwUJBiWEiZf6PeEMswEE1PD9 7J9RJvoGC2QOoLqXvtzFzJ+n0Lur16SoYADDGxIA65WeIOd5GQq2lnwYDy8T3H6mwpyg emHg== |
| X-Google-Dkim-Signature | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=fH2eH7wQsFOmwHrokvwFoi0B8sxedTIsQGpwkVv4SBM=; b=EqOxQ6jPAgdG1Ei5RGmmEV3xdOSGj14pBKL/5R6gfflUbLSfEBKqYKinMEW85XSF2p czGYk/tymgMPTIvkWwpgFYujScaV1gQvo6GbVTzhVyU8v3OLcpxIXZZ7BPMjsXMfZCSD DxEL1jgpxs4YDgg7QOaXjSqud0D8hWclm4YVmcIpBqYJro3XblmvwccBC3E0eQ7vzMcb /ns2j1w+Xs05Z7bCHvqtf719hEoxEKfrx3+1HYvdZ1cD0fN22TLV2UZ6TlmqaXEdRSEP r/D/ASNbed9cVIoBstCAxVA/FLPogYl7Bvzke4JO8WQafsgSC06bQla0CfWsT0AyLj4X m05g== |
| X-Gm-Message-State | APjAAAWxFg4Z70uDvcsFVBFP5fCd/GITpjfDjbKH/aXsAEK657gEtUbv VbFSWs6HxNpTK4jnJTNa8hMR9lu6cfDpqanDB20= |
| X-Google-SMTP-Source | APXvYqw7133UF+MjwefNlZgIoPn8flF8SdbmZFO3aZiuTilxPyLUh6dbHqqdDhbBWtBdqbeR7W/OMF4NNcTtjFNQ64o= |
| X-Received | by 2002:a67:ea52:: with SMTP id r18mr985807vso.222.1571999902848; Fri, 25 Oct 2019 03:38:22 -0700 (PDT) |
| MIME-Version | 1.0 |
| Content-Type | multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000cbd8ce0595b9bf2c" |
| X-Mailing-List | <debian-python@lists.debian.org> archive/latest/17503 |
| List-ID | <debian-python.lists.debian.org> |
| List-URL | <https://lists.debian.org/debian-python/> |
| List-Archive | https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/CAOO6c=xPXj4vf31aWOU6riSsLtcD8Td78n6RxBfKyDna87tF6w@mail.gmail.com |
| Approved | robomod@news.nic.it |
| Lines | 52 |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
| Sender | robomod@news.nic.it |
| X-Original-Cc | debian-python <debian-python@lists.debian.org> |
| X-Original-Date | Fri, 25 Oct 2019 12:38:11 +0200 |
| X-Original-Message-ID | <CAOO6c=xPXj4vf31aWOU6riSsLtcD8Td78n6RxBfKyDna87tF6w@mail.gmail.com> |
| X-Original-References | <CAB4XWXx5R3uEkLz7iLjGX-ZTZivWnKTVnJPk3NDQGYtBrO96Jg@mail.gmail.com> <a0d35ad7-4322-bb38-5e1d-6dbb97e33905@zoho.com> |
| Xref | csiph.com linux.debian.maint.python:11942 |
Show key headers only | View raw
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw
Hi, pá 25. 10. 2019 v 9:09 odesílatel Rebecca N. Palmer <rebecca_palmer@zoho.com> napsal: > Not the whole source package, but we do want to remove the py2 binary. > Maybe there should be two versions of the email, with the one for py2/3 > packages saying 'NMU' instead of 'removal'? > this is not how autorm works. You can't remove from testing only one of two binary package from same source package. You are removing package as a whole. But maintainer can anytime fix that bug by removing py2 binary from source package, which is few minutes work. -- Best regards Ondřej Nový
Back to linux.debian.maint.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Discussing next steps for the Python2 removal Matthias Klose <doko@debian.org> - 2019-10-22 17:10 +0200
Re: Discussing next steps for the Python2 removal Sandro Tosi <morph@debian.org> - 2019-10-22 17:50 +0200
Re: Discussing next steps for the Python2 removal Sandro Tosi <morph@debian.org> - 2019-10-23 04:30 +0200
Re: Discussing next steps for the Python2 removal Sandro Tosi <morph@debian.org> - 2019-11-27 03:20 +0100
Re: Discussing next steps for the Python2 removal Paul Gevers <elbrus@debian.org> - 2019-10-22 20:50 +0200
Re: Discussing next steps for the Python2 removal Ondrej Novy <novy@ondrej.org> - 2019-10-24 22:10 +0200
Re: Discussing next steps for the Python2 removal Sandro Tosi <morph@debian.org> - 2019-10-25 03:40 +0200
Re: Discussing next steps for the Python2 removal Sandro Tosi <morph@debian.org> - 2019-10-25 03:40 +0200
Re: Discussing next steps for the Python2 removal "Rebecca N. Palmer" <rebecca_palmer@zoho.com> - 2019-10-25 09:10 +0200
Re: Discussing next steps for the Python2 removal Ondrej Novy <novy@ondrej.org> - 2019-10-25 13:00 +0200
Re: Discussing next steps for the Python2 removal Simon McVittie <smcv@debian.org> - 2019-10-28 11:00 +0100
Re: Discussing next steps for the Python2 removal Ondrej Novy <novy@ondrej.org> - 2019-10-28 11:50 +0100
Re: Discussing next steps for the Python2 removal Ondrej Novy <novy@ondrej.org> - 2019-10-25 13:00 +0200
csiph-web