Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.debian.maint.python > #11941

Re: Discussing next steps for the Python2 removal

Path csiph.com!aioe.org!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod
From Ondrej Novy <novy@ondrej.org>
Newsgroups linux.debian.maint.python
Subject Re: Discussing next steps for the Python2 removal
Date Fri, 25 Oct 2019 13:00:02 +0200
Message-ID <yV5u2-9r-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <yU3Xk-1fZ-19@gated-at.bofh.it> <yURAJ-8kE-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <yUWK5-2Yf-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
X-Original-To Sandro Tosi <morph@debian.org>
X-Mailbox-Line From debian-python-request@lists.debian.org Fri Oct 25 10:54:08 2019
Old-Return-Path <ondrej.novy@gmail.com>
X-Amavis-Spam-Status No, score=-4.649 tagged_above=-10000 required=5.3 tests=[BAYES_00=-2, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, FOURLA=0.1, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.001, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, HTML_MESSAGE=2, LDO_WHITELIST=-5, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
X-Policyd-Weight using cached result; rate: -5.5
Dkim-Signature v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ondrej-org.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=UaRaodVP68/zRJEOhqq16Ws4T9YOzQSGwWZ458r45zs=; b=fa+GGBFGBwI9v5aRdYey+NGruSn8hH2kH9qS8AE7FcsHlvacZXbuym3M9HEaSChwtT kNfonJT1avA5mb62GXNvZrnlQbdsDhrsBidMQijXRM7A/00gm7hUGJkyc2AAilVBSaMb UWj2tOo0umOr5ZCiy3dZNYP57NXPTwpmNTZpnCfYAqTRTpyfRsBa5N+x3hg1fF3A6rm+ Uptw1X6W7BNubNT8+uoHmoqNDs6E40nKg647Fq/owLqmpAUfJp/zAaAxSiZlaTGWYeun fDSUiUVhyf0IdAFJ7SG5KN++aM9x2khpVn7vHEmhVyjkFr8F4BcDe3VanM7qRyLTz1fH n4Bg==
X-Google-Dkim-Signature v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=UaRaodVP68/zRJEOhqq16Ws4T9YOzQSGwWZ458r45zs=; b=dJY4hWuscjb6Qp19OdJmknjM/vouNearLb9iSz+9rcYiRTbhkBbX425UIKAEoOY8OP u/foBB7r2uXXNETtzNktnFC9QUm8JWnB+sSut7zjUz6YzYVa27nbi1ijy1cnUFh5AIvY E658nprM9BfoGxEgXPI2z6+WozxqV0tD4GJJUmpf8b6gACk5LJa3fE6HFKiH0oH406sd KvPHc1ME4MrWK4cY1dIaTsJrN9hhYAJ5K8bUr2JjbUuq+5+JUwu8u9Uq274bQ0BYFpFO aNmHBbz1mNGk6BzJu8XAKp2IfiZBIeRF1vRELmGX24/cS+LEjrU3O+ezUhAFdodPF1V0 5elA==
X-Gm-Message-State APjAAAXp/mgxOGu+KnuujTCq3kVXe+bNficyn1EmoIEQZ3f/KGucHUIb pIBdUEIRc99cODt5nsv2kBXmc372WYDfygaM3l7SiSnmnk4=
X-Google-SMTP-Source APXvYqzE8VEmcRN38Wzk6NRQjBrSh5yQZ7S3INlLen+M6uwhjxSKkWhyz7SSk/bFX5NUWDrDqLUa7V73rx9+UWNyRj4=
X-Received by 2002:ab0:15a1:: with SMTP id i30mr1170291uae.102.1571999812593; Fri, 25 Oct 2019 03:36:52 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version 1.0
Content-Type multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000006ab1100595b9ba44"
X-Mailing-List <debian-python@lists.debian.org> archive/latest/17502
List-ID <debian-python.lists.debian.org>
List-URL <https://lists.debian.org/debian-python/>
List-Archive https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/CAOO6c=xzCn82Uz+qwt+yR+MsD0uj6Eg0iSip7Oxw34Zd4ok+Rw@mail.gmail.com
Approved robomod@news.nic.it
Lines 76
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway
Sender robomod@news.nic.it
X-Original-Cc debian-python <debian-python@lists.debian.org>, Matthias Klose <doko@debian.org>, Paul Gevers <elbrus@debian.org>, Chris Lamb <lamby@debian.org>
X-Original-Date Fri, 25 Oct 2019 12:36:41 +0200
X-Original-Message-ID <CAOO6c=xzCn82Uz+qwt+yR+MsD0uj6Eg0iSip7Oxw34Zd4ok+Rw@mail.gmail.com>
X-Original-References <10ee755b-5e97-84bc-22d8-4ed29182bf84@debian.org> <CAOO6c=xEf1Zp1toML1FqGzBQOPCUrNR+SEiKpvSLG8sdKcY22w@mail.gmail.com> <CAB4XWXx5R3uEkLz7iLjGX-ZTZivWnKTVnJPk3NDQGYtBrO96Jg@mail.gmail.com>
Xref csiph.com linux.debian.maint.python:11941

Show key headers only | View raw


[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw

Hi,

pá 25. 10. 2019 v 3:30 odesílatel Sandro Tosi <morph@debian.org> napsal:

> do we really want to remove from testing (and subsequently from
> debian, as mentioned below) if it both has a py2 and a py3k package?
> should we limit this to py2-ONLY packages?
>

yes and no. If maintainer wants to keep package in Debian, fix is simple:
Just remove one binary package. If nobody cares (no team upload, no NMU) we
want to move forward and remove that package.

> * bug is not marked as py2keep
> > * all modules and low popcon apps (< 300)
>
> JFYI for now i was steering clear of removing py2 support even of
> modules with high popcon (while it's true they may not have any rdeps
> in the archive, there could be plenty of 3rd party code using them).
>

we want to remove Python 2 in bullseye ideally. So no 3rd party code will
be using them, because there will be no Py2 :)


> is there any plan to make some of this tags an upload-rejecting one?
>

maybe later?

-- 
Best regards
 Ondřej Nový

Back to linux.debian.maint.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Discussing next steps for the Python2 removal Matthias Klose <doko@debian.org> - 2019-10-22 17:10 +0200
  Re: Discussing next steps for the Python2 removal Sandro Tosi <morph@debian.org> - 2019-10-22 17:50 +0200
    Re: Discussing next steps for the Python2 removal Sandro Tosi <morph@debian.org> - 2019-10-23 04:30 +0200
    Re: Discussing next steps for the Python2 removal Sandro Tosi <morph@debian.org> - 2019-11-27 03:20 +0100
  Re: Discussing next steps for the Python2 removal Paul Gevers <elbrus@debian.org> - 2019-10-22 20:50 +0200
  Re: Discussing next steps for the Python2 removal Ondrej Novy <novy@ondrej.org> - 2019-10-24 22:10 +0200
    Re: Discussing next steps for the Python2 removal Sandro Tosi <morph@debian.org> - 2019-10-25 03:40 +0200
    Re: Discussing next steps for the Python2 removal Sandro Tosi <morph@debian.org> - 2019-10-25 03:40 +0200
      Re: Discussing next steps for the Python2 removal "Rebecca N. Palmer" <rebecca_palmer@zoho.com> - 2019-10-25 09:10 +0200
        Re: Discussing next steps for the Python2 removal Ondrej Novy <novy@ondrej.org> - 2019-10-25 13:00 +0200
          Re: Discussing next steps for the Python2 removal Simon McVittie <smcv@debian.org> - 2019-10-28 11:00 +0100
            Re: Discussing next steps for the Python2 removal Ondrej Novy <novy@ondrej.org> - 2019-10-28 11:50 +0100
      Re: Discussing next steps for the Python2 removal Ondrej Novy <novy@ondrej.org> - 2019-10-25 13:00 +0200

csiph-web