Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.debian.maint.python > #11940

Re: Discussing next steps for the Python2 removal

Path csiph.com!3.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!weretis.net!feeder7.news.weretis.net!news.mixmin.net!aioe.org!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod
From "Rebecca N. Palmer" <rebecca_palmer@zoho.com>
Newsgroups linux.debian.maint.python
Subject Re: Discussing next steps for the Python2 removal
Date Fri, 25 Oct 2019 09:10:01 +0200
Message-ID <yV1Tr-6sS-11@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <yUWK5-2Yf-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
X-Original-To debian-python@lists.debian.org
X-Mailbox-Line From debian-python-request@lists.debian.org Fri Oct 25 07:09:18 2019
Old-Return-Path <rebecca_palmer@zoho.com>
X-Amavis-Spam-Status No, score=-7.099 tagged_above=-10000 required=5.3 tests=[BAYES_00=-2, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FOURLA=0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, LDO_WHITELIST=-5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
X-Policyd-Weight using cached result; rate: -5.5
Arc-Seal i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1571986441; cv=none; d=zohomail.com; s=zohoarc; b=CfMlAr2rBJz3kiUBrDfTJTTwfEsUbGyVbKLutdhcY02XlQOsO744NUBswXyKC1f1VwB0AzrlyvQAH/aJRl6UTH5FdvY5g7Y6EQYwrm6VA2fsFw+TQTdmztOCa3X5z1BDpKhOmuY5xtfLyj6xxV1yQfsZIEO5xl0oj2MciisTuss=
Arc-Message-Signature i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=zohomail.com; s=zohoarc; t=1571986441; h=Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Date:From:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Message-ID:Subject:To; bh=2mxKkvfQkQI7jlenx6I6hR3ofCa6DJJ9vRl/x2AStBs=; b=Bm5Cs7NNnkdyoQdXl/caqRWOhmkzfBAtx1yf0x9l+yDCEMIvM8s8IQ6MZjqpw5sNfUXbQ/9gVVRyXbddvAn3IVw1maywlYef7+evEAiverdLpQ+yHBfDC5ouX9L2IGPWiBhnQnI4UND2B2/4ZVWXFegjsvCHy8fvTbwBs9POFfc=
Arc-Authentication-Results i=1; mx.zohomail.com; dkim=pass header.i=zoho.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=rebecca_palmer@zoho.com; dmarc=pass header.from=<rebecca_palmer@zoho.com> header.from=<rebecca_palmer@zoho.com>
Domainkey-Signature a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=zapps768; d=zoho.com; h=to:from:subject:in-reply-to:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version:content-type; b=mffhhTRABzvmL9Yu1xEDDsC+vcOi+9YIZFBNZg76JQDPRTm58dOZ0E3lWb7bUfx5jOUUCCjpeVhc EspU5E6g2/9BuLUIOdRC4f7AEUI99eurJ0wTt3Hx5OnQ6icTKjDw
Dkim-Signature v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1571986441; s=zm2019; d=zoho.com; i=rebecca_palmer@zoho.com; h=To:From:Subject:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; l=397; bh=2mxKkvfQkQI7jlenx6I6hR3ofCa6DJJ9vRl/x2AStBs=; b=iu07fjYYy554YImpH1JAH2cMbymMR4+kI2EVgqCjzE6oFaPvnzDDA8075pruW7s2 erznob7aN5OKsdPdKdCdU1Cq3Tm06Wyb9s94HGlB4muW2dN85XnoQvWKKWBBBzfOTeZ XrJkRJ8RwsrkBsHX2uIKdnpGkcTuJ9XUPYi0Grlw=
User-Agent Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.9.0
MIME-Version 1.0
Content-Type text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Language en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding 7bit
X-Zohomailclient External
X-Mailing-List <debian-python@lists.debian.org> archive/latest/17501
List-ID <debian-python.lists.debian.org>
List-URL <https://lists.debian.org/debian-python/>
List-Archive https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/a0d35ad7-4322-bb38-5e1d-6dbb97e33905@zoho.com
Approved robomod@news.nic.it
Lines 8
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway
Sender robomod@news.nic.it
X-Original-Date Fri, 25 Oct 2019 07:53:58 +0100
X-Original-Message-ID <a0d35ad7-4322-bb38-5e1d-6dbb97e33905@zoho.com>
X-Original-References <CAB4XWXx5R3uEkLz7iLjGX-ZTZivWnKTVnJPk3NDQGYtBrO96Jg@mail.gmail.com>
Xref csiph.com linux.debian.maint.python:11940

Show key headers only | View raw


Sandro Tosi wrote:
> do we really want to remove from testing (and subsequently from
> debian, as mentioned below) if it both has a py2 and a py3k package?
> should we limit this to py2-ONLY packages?

Not the whole source package, but we do want to remove the py2 binary. 
Maybe there should be two versions of the email, with the one for py2/3 
packages saying 'NMU' instead of 'removal'?

Back to linux.debian.maint.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Discussing next steps for the Python2 removal Matthias Klose <doko@debian.org> - 2019-10-22 17:10 +0200
  Re: Discussing next steps for the Python2 removal Sandro Tosi <morph@debian.org> - 2019-10-22 17:50 +0200
    Re: Discussing next steps for the Python2 removal Sandro Tosi <morph@debian.org> - 2019-10-23 04:30 +0200
    Re: Discussing next steps for the Python2 removal Sandro Tosi <morph@debian.org> - 2019-11-27 03:20 +0100
  Re: Discussing next steps for the Python2 removal Paul Gevers <elbrus@debian.org> - 2019-10-22 20:50 +0200
  Re: Discussing next steps for the Python2 removal Ondrej Novy <novy@ondrej.org> - 2019-10-24 22:10 +0200
    Re: Discussing next steps for the Python2 removal Sandro Tosi <morph@debian.org> - 2019-10-25 03:40 +0200
    Re: Discussing next steps for the Python2 removal Sandro Tosi <morph@debian.org> - 2019-10-25 03:40 +0200
      Re: Discussing next steps for the Python2 removal "Rebecca N. Palmer" <rebecca_palmer@zoho.com> - 2019-10-25 09:10 +0200
        Re: Discussing next steps for the Python2 removal Ondrej Novy <novy@ondrej.org> - 2019-10-25 13:00 +0200
          Re: Discussing next steps for the Python2 removal Simon McVittie <smcv@debian.org> - 2019-10-28 11:00 +0100
            Re: Discussing next steps for the Python2 removal Ondrej Novy <novy@ondrej.org> - 2019-10-28 11:50 +0100
      Re: Discussing next steps for the Python2 removal Ondrej Novy <novy@ondrej.org> - 2019-10-25 13:00 +0200

csiph-web