Groups > linux.debian.maint.python > #11764

Re: Should python-cloudpickle get a py2keep tag?

Path	csiph.com!3.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!news.unit0.net!news.mixmin.net!aioe.org!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod
From	Diane Trout <diane@ghic.org>
Newsgroups	linux.debian.maint.python
Subject	Re: Should python-cloudpickle get a py2keep tag?
Date	Thu, 05 Sep 2019 20:50:01 +0200
Message-ID	<yD4Zr-5bj-11@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References	<yD4wp-4Wm-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <yD4wp-4Wm-9@gated-at.bofh.it>
X-Original-To	Matthias Klose <doko@debian.org>, debian-python@lists.debian.org
X-Mailbox-Line	From debian-python-request@lists.debian.org Thu Sep 5 18:42:32 2019
Old-Return-Path	<diane@ghic.org>
X-Amavis-Spam-Status	No, score=-6.363 tagged_above=-10000 required=5.3 tests=[BAYES_00=-2, LDO_WHITELIST=-5, SARE_MSGID_LONG40=0.637] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
X-Policyd-Weight	using cached result; rate: -4.6
Content-Type	text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
User-Agent	Evolution 3.30.5-1.1
MIME-Version	1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding	7bit
X-Mailing-List	<debian-python@lists.debian.org> archive/latest/17282
List-ID	<debian-python.lists.debian.org>
List-URL	<https://lists.debian.org/debian-python/>
List-Archive	https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/b5d24f4cae80571a624f84417e2efc746bcb5381.camel@ghic.org
Approved	robomod@news.nic.it
Lines	29
Organization	linux.* mail to news gateway
Sender	robomod@news.nic.it
X-Original-Date	Thu, 05 Sep 2019 11:42:18 -0700
X-Original-Message-ID	<b5d24f4cae80571a624f84417e2efc746bcb5381.camel@ghic.org>
X-Original-References	<8cd24bd52b18a80f876f270d2ac950d82d5ac3bb.camel@ghic.org> <a53e0aaa-b849-e739-929e-95937f33f1cb@debian.org>
Xref	csiph.com linux.debian.maint.python:11764

Show key headers only | View raw

On Thu, 2019-09-05 at 20:14 +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> 
> you are asking about the least preferred option, without telling why
> you can't 
> convert to python3, or why you can't remove the affected
> packages.  If you have 
> both spyder and spyder3 (Python3?), then why not drop spyder?  I
> didn't look at 
> skimage, but maybe look there first if it needs to be Python2.
> 

I was assuming that py2keep was a temporary flag that would be removed
after the leaf packages get fixed.

Since spyder and skimage are under the science team I wasn't sure how
long it would take for them to get around to removing the python2
packages.

Both spyder and skimage packages have python3 versions. spyder does
install into /usr/bin/spider so it's removal will have a bigger impact
on end users than something that's just a python package.

I did upload a new version of cloudpickle last night 1.2.1-1 with
Python2 removed, I'm trying to figure out if I should let the
dependencies just live with the previous python-cloudpickle 0.8.0
package or if I should upload a new version of 1.2.1 with the python2
packaging built.

Diane

Back to linux.debian.maint.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Should python-cloudpickle get a py2keep tag? Diane Trout <diane@ghic.org> - 2019-09-05 20:20 +0200
  Re: Should python-cloudpickle get a py2keep tag? Matthias Klose <doko@debian.org> - 2019-09-05 20:20 +0200
    Re: Should python-cloudpickle get a py2keep tag? Diane Trout <diane@ghic.org> - 2019-09-05 20:50 +0200

csiph-web