Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.debian.maint.python > #11119

Re: packaging django-rest-framework-filters

Path csiph.com!news.mixmin.net!news.unit0.net!newsfeed.CARNet.hr!news.spin.it!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod
From Wookey <wookey@wookware.org>
Newsgroups linux.debian.maint.python
Subject Re: packaging django-rest-framework-filters
Date Thu, 22 Nov 2018 18:10:02 +0100
Message-ID <wX0Ei-6hF-17@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <wWPpv-7HD-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <wWS41-HX-5@gated-at.bofh.it>
X-Original-To debian-python@lists.debian.org
X-Mailbox-Line From debian-python-request@lists.debian.org Thu Nov 22 17:08:00 2018
Old-Return-Path <wookey@wookware.org>
X-Amavis-Spam-Status No, score=-14.3 tagged_above=-10000 required=5.3 tests=[BAYES_00=-2, LDO_WHITELIST=-5, PGPSIGNATURE=-5, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
X-Policyd-Weight DYN_NJABL=ERR(0) NOT_IN_SBL_XBL_SPAMHAUS=-1.5 BL_NJABL=ERR(-1.5) CL_IP_EQ_FROM_MX=-3.1; rate: -6.1
Mail-Followup-To debian-python@lists.debian.org
MIME-Version 1.0
Content-Type multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="kapqdxb5ekcfyzkh"
Content-Disposition inline
Organization Wookware
User-Agent NeoMutt/20170113 (1.7.2)
X-Mailing-List <debian-python@lists.debian.org> archive/latest/16558
List-ID <debian-python.lists.debian.org>
List-URL <https://lists.debian.org/debian-python/>
List-Archive https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/20181122170734.d56t5mgb4elunzfz@mail.wookware.org
Approved robomod@news.nic.it
Lines 84
Sender robomod@news.nic.it
X-Original-Date Thu, 22 Nov 2018 17:07:35 +0000
X-Original-Message-ID <20181122170734.d56t5mgb4elunzfz@mail.wookware.org>
X-Original-References <20181122050200.tcg7urpyqjd5rx7n@mail.wookware.org> <d4d0abf3-8faf-553e-f823-9a1f2324e29a@debian.org>
Xref csiph.com linux.debian.maint.python:11119

Show key headers only | View raw


[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw

On 2018-11-22 08:59 +0100, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> On 11/22/18 6:02 AM, Wookey wrote:

No advice on best way to start a python packaging template?

> > And it looks like it should be called src:drf-filters
> > binary:python3-djangoresetframework-filters to fit in with naming
> > conventions of related packages/python team (even though upstream is
> > 'django-rest-framework-filters'). Right?
> 
> The binary package name is right, though there's no convention for the
> source package naming. "drf-filters" doesn't feel very descriptive to me
> though.

I agree, but I took it from 
drf-extensions -> python3-djangorestframework-extensions
drf-generators -> python3-djangorestframework-generators
drf-haystack -> python3-djangorestframework-haystack

on the other hand there is:
djangorestframework-gis -> python3-djangorestframework-gis

I don't care which is used. I guess djangorestframework-filters is
clearer, and closer to upstream so people can find it. I'll go with
that unless someone says the drf-* names are a better plan.

> > Also related: I've updated drf-extensions to 0.4 (from the current
> > 0.3.1), as that is needed for lava, and fixes
> > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=865851
> > 
> > What I'm not quite sure about is if there is any reason _not_ to
> > update this package. It has no reverse dependencies so I presume this
> > is a good idea and I should just get on with it? would a 10-day NMU be
> > appropriate?
> 
> If you join the team, I see no reason why you couldn't do the upgrade
> yourself indeed, especially if you do a 10-day NMU on it.

So I need to join the team to do anything in the salsa repos? I don't
claim any real python extertise (I can just about read it - I try to
avoid writing it as I'm a bash, perl and C person). I would prefer to
sort this out to a decent standard and then hand it over the python
team for maintenance, but I can join up as a minor conributor if that
works better.

It occurs to me that you probably prefer me to do this as a branch in
the drf-extensions salsa repo, rather than a simple NMU? I prefer the
latter as I know how to do that (sbuild+dupload), but if I have the
permissions I can have a go at this newfangled git-pq + salsa stuff. I
presume that'll be less work for you guys and I suppose I'll learn
something :-)

Wookey
-- 
Principal hats:  Linaro, Debian, Wookware, ARM
http://wookware.org/

Back to linux.debian.maint.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

packaging django-rest-framework-filters  Wookey <wookey@wookware.org> - 2018-11-22 06:10 +0100
  Re: packaging django-rest-framework-filters Thomas Goirand <zigo@debian.org> - 2018-11-22 09:00 +0100
    Re: packaging django-rest-framework-filters Wookey <wookey@wookware.org> - 2018-11-22 18:10 +0100
      Re: packaging django-rest-framework-filters Piotr Ożarowski <piotr@debian.org> - 2018-11-22 22:30 +0100
    Re: packaging django-rest-framework-filters Wookey <wookey@wookware.org> - 2018-11-26 05:10 +0100
      Re: packaging django-rest-framework-filters Neil Williams <codehelp@debian.org> - 2018-11-28 10:00 +0100
        Re: packaging django-rest-framework-filters Wookey <wookey@wookware.org> - 2018-11-28 15:40 +0100
          Re: packaging django-rest-framework-filters Neil Williams <codehelp@debian.org> - 2018-11-28 18:00 +0100
            Re: packaging django-rest-framework-filters Thomas Goirand <zigo@debian.org> - 2018-11-29 11:50 +0100
              Re: packaging django-rest-framework-filters Neil Williams <codehelp@debian.org> - 2018-11-29 12:50 +0100
                Re: packaging django-rest-framework-filters Scott Kitterman <debian@kitterman.com> - 2018-11-29 13:30 +0100
                Re: packaging django-rest-framework-filters Piotr Ożarowski <piotr@debian.org> - 2018-11-29 14:10 +0100
    Re: packaging django-rest-framework-filters Wookey <wookey@wookware.org> - 2018-12-08 05:00 +0100

csiph-web