Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.debian.maint.python > #10365

Re: the new PyPI, coming next month

Path csiph.com!goblin1!goblin2!goblin.stu.neva.ru!aioe.org!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod
From Donald Stufft <donald@stufft.io>
Newsgroups linux.debian.maint.python
Subject Re: the new PyPI, coming next month
Date Sun, 01 Apr 2018 15:40:01 +0200
Message-ID <vzLnb-3Ke-3@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <vzB4t-5b9-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <vzBQS-5JA-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <vzC0y-5ML-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <vzEF3-7zt-3@gated-at.bofh.it>
X-Original-To Dominik George <natureshadow@debian.org>
X-Mailbox-Line From debian-python-request@lists.debian.org Sun Apr 1 13:39:35 2018
Old-Return-Path <donald@stufft.io>
X-Amavis-Spam-Status No, score=-5.7 tagged_above=-10000 required=5.3 tests=[BAYES_00=-2, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, EMPTY_BODY=3, FOURLA=0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=2, LDO_WHITELIST=-5, PGPSIGNATURE=-5, PUSSY=2, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
X-Policyd-Weight using cached result; rate: -7
Dkim-Signature v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=stufft.io; h=cc :content-type:date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :references:subject:to:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s= mesmtp; bh=59Gmr5xyGhQOTy0pj7R+qadD+DN/F5pJBQ/VUZXvABc=; b=eYT4B Ic67KKZK4t8SM2cMCr28wChcuNX6z0GI+nqCVYc7cgU9ReOUeLehtS4K/hxG6XUD G3ub+OSsJoDCYYexranBJGSTxGM8d37z+D/oKU9sbltzuAaWEh8WFWY/EzVmeCL7 zWNYEM1M7pGJR4TvtJjmxavHtC5YMjKWdEiLrc=
Dkim-Signature v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-sender :x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; bh=59Gmr5xyGhQOTy0pj7R+qadD+DN/F 5pJBQ/VUZXvABc=; b=O5lHbseI1WmhfOI7NrjnfOwdJFio2yGUIE0BDHMioGHes AsYwLU4a6mGJHmlMH5hFzaMvMClHbAqXH4EgdKGwNeGND6/FE6b4AuYpy3cH7Xqb If6nKmhcTS+rC5MFJT3fsgOVPTo0unPRxQQQL7HznXd7kHo+KFz4oF3KNzzQgK3P 8twzyPeuoAcywzRzTULTYsmygovRo7QllFuMiX2Acsp5UJk/tSsDXdQb7gPu2Q2b RKxwfGyskSvDpIhxjQQ8t4Vq6rNHlhK+IIRGMZXad3YMYedl66wh2PpWYWv1OotZ uZHgm+sxlb30XxqsJR8cID7XkR6rbNwsHiDM5a2ag==
X-Me-Sender <xms:AuHAWsQUC2GbcTfjlu58GNhKmpcEfg_3ejJ9kgh1dld2oNB_38hHMA>
Content-Type multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_1EEFE4E8-B5E2-4187-ABB1-9F30A96B1558"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha512
MIME-Version 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 11.2 \(3445.5.20\))
X-Mailer Apple Mail (2.3445.5.20)
X-Mailing-List <debian-python@lists.debian.org> archive/latest/15765
List-ID <debian-python.lists.debian.org>
List-URL <https://lists.debian.org/debian-python/>
List-Archive https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/0F7A4E4F-A49A-4F98-A334-BE039C9EB9B9@stufft.io
Approved robomod@news.nic.it
Lines 161
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway
Sender robomod@news.nic.it
X-Original-Cc debian-python@lists.debian.org, Sumana Harihareswara <sh@changeset.nyc>
X-Original-Date Sun, 1 Apr 2018 09:39:13 -0400
X-Original-Message-ID <0F7A4E4F-A49A-4F98-A334-BE039C9EB9B9@stufft.io>
X-Original-References <b06878cc-90f6-d033-4fdd-fa191db6c083@changeset.nyc> <E695279A-7F89-4973-933B-CEAD4455DF3F@kitterman.com> <7236AF0E-DA5C-45B9-AA78-5BCF900D7846@stufft.io> <20180401062709.GB10210@portux.lan.naturalnet.de>
Xref csiph.com linux.debian.maint.python:10365

Show key headers only | View raw


[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw

> On Apr 1, 2018, at 2:27 AM, Dominik George <natureshadow@debian.org> wrote:
> 
> Hi,
> 
>> To be clear, PGP signatures can still be uploaded and they are still
>> available for download, they just don’t appear in the UI anymore.
> 
> So, what does the pypi.debian.net redirector use for uscan?  I imagine it
> used to scrape the website.  Can it be changed to use the JSON API?

The original PoC I wrote used the JSON API, but I don’t think what’s being deployed is descendant from my PoC so I have no idea what it uses, but if it’s not using the JSON API then yes it can be.

> 
>> Longer term I’d *like* to get rid of PGP signatures, because I think
>> their value here is actually pretty low.
> 
> I partially share this opinion, but that's a question to be discusses with
> the Debian policy people in general.  While checking a GPG signature on the
> source tarball in general is a good idea, I am afraid some developers just
> drop any key they find on first glance into the package and are done with
> it, which actually provides nothing but a false sense of safety.
> 
>> In that case they’d be replaced with TUF, but that’s a longer term
>> project.
> 
> That one?: https://github.com/theupdateframework/tuf <https://github.com/theupdateframework/tuf>


Yes.


> 
> Well, I can only say *please* do not remove the possibility to upload signed
> source tarballs, but leave that to the developers!
> 
> -nik
> 
> --
> PGP-Fingerprint: 3C9D 54A4 7575 C026 FB17  FD26 B79A 3C16 A0C4 F296
> 
> Dominik George · Hundeshagenstr. 26 · 53225 Bonn
> Phone: +49 228 92934581 · https://www.dominik-george.de/
> 
> Teckids e.V. · FrOSCon e.V. · Debian Developer
> 
> LPIC-3 Linux Enterprise Professional (Security)

Back to linux.debian.maint.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

the new PyPI, coming next month Sumana Harihareswara <sh@changeset.nyc> - 2018-04-01 04:40 +0200
  Re: the new PyPI, coming next month Scott Kitterman <debian@kitterman.com> - 2018-04-01 05:30 +0200
    Re: the new PyPI, coming next month Donald Stufft <donald@stufft.io> - 2018-04-01 05:40 +0200
      Re: the new PyPI, coming next month Dominik George <natureshadow@debian.org> - 2018-04-01 08:30 +0200
        Re: the new PyPI, coming next month Donald Stufft <donald@stufft.io> - 2018-04-01 15:40 +0200
    Re: the new PyPI, coming next month Sumana Harihareswara <sh@changeset.nyc> - 2018-04-01 05:50 +0200
  Re: the new PyPI, coming next month Sumana Harihareswara <sh@changeset.nyc> - 2018-04-01 13:20 +0200
    Re: the new PyPI, coming next month Sumana Harihareswara <sh@changeset.nyc> - 2018-04-03 15:40 +0200

csiph-web