Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.debian.maint.python > #10290

Re: RFS: mwic 0.7.4-1

Path csiph.com!aioe.org!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod
From Paul Wise <pabs@debian.org>
Newsgroups linux.debian.maint.python
Subject Re: RFS: mwic 0.7.4-1
Date Wed, 21 Mar 2018 13:50:01 +0100
Message-ID <vvLlL-25A-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <vu5eV-1xH-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <vuaHE-5ht-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <vugN4-zo-19@gated-at.bofh.it> <vuxkS-2NZ-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <vvt5v-79z-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <vvCLv-55F-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <vvIR1-HD-95@gated-at.bofh.it>
X-Mailbox-Line From debian-python-request@lists.debian.org Wed Mar 21 12:43:39 2018
Old-Return-Path <paul.is.wise@gmail.com>
X-Amavis-Spam-Status No, score=-6.501 tagged_above=-10000 required=5.3 tests=[BAYES_00=-2, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.249, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, LDO_WHITELIST=-5, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
X-Policyd-Weight NOT_IN_SBL_XBL_SPAMHAUS=-1.5 NOT_IN_BL_NJABL=-1.5 CL_IP_EQ_HELO_IP=-2 (check from: .gmail. - helo: .mail-ot0-x22f.google. - helo-domain: .google.) FROM/MX_MATCHES_HELO(DOMAIN)=-2; rate: -7
Dkim-Signature v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to; bh=RNtUm7MXVMyJkZzDaimNTW9rSpdSkRbG3E+3UqsvX+I=; b=AvJ6OR9MGJrJHVC6nc/ERFJLdW+ED63j/qI7eMI4KvPpB8HdhTynubBxgKxqpWnVEV yPiso2yAkmr4B2Efg0YfkuWgxSaPvUI8s/DxVWVG3rSD7o6e3Oz0ewd1J05D15aNFoV9 APl8OdfnFAH2RwQlpuY2UPqS76jlR2Vxpzv0wlyp+1Dzz7BVt1xyQ7PEK6e6TYNAIGj8 Bh1veoPI8iVpgU5M+kzt4YwdOE+5aySJc3YEeOM7XXjbjv9hyiSjLDOA8bfgfjvraKP9 Bq+AZ4APxzaGPUkYbQcohpnsdnRUg2cZPqxEBGoQ8xiTtFix47bzKopk6G5qafPS/X0d DOHQ==
X-Google-Dkim-Signature v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from :date:message-id:subject:to; bh=RNtUm7MXVMyJkZzDaimNTW9rSpdSkRbG3E+3UqsvX+I=; b=dYgp2oz6HN7OB6Sc6OKNTN91CjCWA2H1hs/WU/m+94rUgbPGlH+Ap/vmtz/FAOqgsq XnDnw2qlIlgnvUWcbENSy/Qr+Pq1g8BzSom2xIcDKuhtJXTgJ5LTDQNCi5+1lBHPyp5y VpK1iy9i55PPIiHeRl/2xRyLnncAbBD+FDFmMLIXlPHk7XmqQf+GcDMtTKU63JyE6c1A M9gCt9RVyD/SFgKYOzVve1x2138WHsOzw46Sw+QK6rszFKNVZXJVGWdnHBknutpEC2o/ ubIuIpliaCJYVwi5XT9DQhzfiaaYI2wu7lcjRwlspLRoHv6twqvTthnHl+jMPEAk3rfG EDsA==
X-Gm-Message-State AElRT7Hm4a8PcpZJSsmWeDxItgo19on24xHe+aNXxM24Cq4cpFC+R/ll 7LWBU6otTOXgzcIla+S0q/l6BFf1da6ZaWijE3s=
X-Google-SMTP-Source AG47ELvCsvNjsxLqzozhpvZArLfpM1X54JOAl2o7vpaggqwWAr02a/ardGUjQa14qjnkV5fFyXXcizusf3bARArKNOU=
X-Received by 2002:a9d:4494:: with SMTP id v20-v6mr4982259ote.397.1521636201795; Wed, 21 Mar 2018 05:43:21 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version 1.0
Sender robomod@news.nic.it
X-Google-Sender-Auth uK8Nh5vyxPshUxNTnFJtiRwnA-w
Content-Type text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
X-Mailing-List <debian-python@lists.debian.org> archive/latest/15688
List-ID <debian-python.lists.debian.org>
List-URL <https://lists.debian.org/debian-python/>
List-Archive https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/CAKTje6HHRm-a+_pqLWV7bFNh6awMYQ=z_gciaE9rStkLvmnBag@mail.gmail.com
Approved robomod@news.nic.it
Lines 19
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway
X-Original-Date Wed, 21 Mar 2018 20:43:21 +0800
X-Original-Message-ID <CAKTje6HHRm-a+_pqLWV7bFNh6awMYQ=z_gciaE9rStkLvmnBag@mail.gmail.com>
X-Original-References <20180316212934.GB28151@debian> <CAKTje6EEcuAskeHAoPvesgpSKo0P60H7jC+LUzxoF=2Z-runBg@mail.gmail.com> <20180317094926.GP28151@debian> <CAKTje6HvCBbjcLRiHmagPjuoLn4np8=BY9R4MrbkPKQxgUAudg@mail.gmail.com> <20180320171150.GY8754@debian> <CAKTje6FqCUq95PJZDcpC29K1ijxDCSVtrJfft9a1Tk5ccQF49w@mail.gmail.com> <20180321100210.GB2961@debian>
X-Original-Sender paul.is.wise@gmail.com
Xref csiph.com linux.debian.maint.python:10290

Show key headers only | View raw


On Wed, Mar 21, 2018 at 6:02 PM, Georg Faerber wrote:

> To put it differently, especially regarding this upstream metadata
> check: If someone opens a bug against lintian to add a new check, does
> "this new check" needs to be backed up by some general consensus within
> the project? Is there some "formal process" around this, besides opening
> a new bug?

Just the new bug and the judgement of the lintian maintainers.

> Changes pushed to git, package on m.d.n updated.

I'll take a look, probably on Friday.

-- 
bye,
pabs

https://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise

Back to linux.debian.maint.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

RFS: mwic 0.7.4-1 Georg Faerber <georg@riseup.net> - 2018-03-16 22:40 +0100
  Re: RFS: mwic 0.7.4-1 Paul Wise <pabs@debian.org> - 2018-03-17 04:30 +0100
    Re: RFS: mwic 0.7.4-1 Georg Faerber <georg@riseup.net> - 2018-03-17 11:00 +0100
      Re: RFS: mwic 0.7.4-1 Paul Wise <pabs@debian.org> - 2018-03-18 04:40 +0100
        Re: RFS: mwic 0.7.4-1 Georg Faerber <georg@riseup.net> - 2018-03-20 18:20 +0100
          Re: RFS: mwic 0.7.4-1 Georg Faerber <georg@riseup.net> - 2018-03-21 02:10 +0100
          Re: RFS: mwic 0.7.4-1 Paul Wise <pabs@debian.org> - 2018-03-21 04:40 +0100
            Re: RFS: mwic 0.7.4-1 Georg Faerber <georg@riseup.net> - 2018-03-21 11:10 +0100
              Re: RFS: mwic 0.7.4-1 Paul Wise <pabs@debian.org> - 2018-03-21 13:50 +0100
                Re: RFS: mwic 0.7.4-1 Paul Wise <pabs@debian.org> - 2018-03-25 05:10 +0200
                Re: RFS: mwic 0.7.4-1 Georg Faerber <georg@riseup.net> - 2018-03-25 05:50 +0200
      Re: RFS: mwic 0.7.4-1 Dmitry Shachnev <mitya57@debian.org> - 2018-03-19 22:50 +0100
        Re: RFS: mwic 0.7.4-1 Georg Faerber <georg@riseup.net> - 2018-03-19 23:40 +0100
          Re: RFS: mwic 0.7.4-1 Simon McVittie <smcv@debian.org> - 2018-03-20 12:50 +0100
          Re: RFS: mwic 0.7.4-1 Dmitry Shachnev <mitya57@debian.org> - 2018-03-20 18:30 +0100
            Re: RFS: mwic 0.7.4-1 Georg Faerber <georg@riseup.net> - 2018-03-20 19:10 +0100

csiph-web