Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.maint.python > #10239
| From | Ben Finney <bignose@debian.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.maint.python |
| Subject | Re: Where to put docs of a -doc package for python 2 + 3 modules? |
| Date | 2018-03-13 08:20 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <vsMo2-2yX-9@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <vssIG-6zE-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <vsDXs-5jQ-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <vsEgN-5uV-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <vsFcR-6ah-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
Ghislain Vaillant <ghisvail@gmail.com> writes: > Definitely [do not name the documentation package ‘python3-foo-doc’], > indeed. The python- prefixes in python-foo and python-foo-doc are not > exactly equivalent. The former usage refers to the Python 2 > interpreter, the latter refers to Python *the language*. Yes, that's how I understand the distinction. Thank you for expressing that. > It's unfortunate our naming convention did not explicitly separate > between both as Arch packages do, whereby `python` is used for source > package and `python2` for binary packages targeting CPython 2.x. Yes. Another point: The name of the documentation package should not depend on whether there is a Python 2 library package. So, the presence or absence of ‘python-foo’ should not change the name of ‘python-foo-doc’. > Imo, we should just make it clear in policy that source packages > should be named `foo` or `python-foo`, and corresponding doc packages > should be named `foo-doc` or `python-foo-doc`. +1. -- \ "Those who will not reason, are bigots, those who cannot, are | `\ fools, and those who dare not, are slaves." —“Lord” George | _o__) Gordon Noel Byron | Ben Finney
Back to linux.debian.maint.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Where to put docs of a -doc package for python 2 + 3 modules? "W. Martin Borgert" <debacle@debian.org> - 2018-03-12 11:20 +0100
Re: Where to put docs of a -doc package for python 2 + 3 modules? Simon McVittie <smcv@debian.org> - 2018-03-12 11:40 +0100
Re: Where to put docs of a -doc package for python 2 + 3 modules? "W. Martin Borgert" <debacle@debian.org> - 2018-03-12 14:30 +0100
Re: Where to put docs of a -doc package for python 2 + 3 modules? Thomas Goirand <zigo@debian.org> - 2018-03-12 23:20 +0100
Re: Where to put docs of a -doc package for python 2 + 3 modules? "W. Martin Borgert" <debacle@debian.org> - 2018-03-12 23:40 +0100
Re: Where to put docs of a -doc package for python 2 + 3 modules? Ghislain Vaillant <ghisvail@gmail.com> - 2018-03-13 00:40 +0100
Re: Where to put docs of a -doc package for python 2 + 3 modules? Ben Finney <bignose@debian.org> - 2018-03-13 08:20 +0100
Re: Where to put docs of a -doc package for python 2 + 3 modules? Thomas Goirand <zigo@debian.org> - 2018-03-13 09:20 +0100
Re: Where to put docs of a -doc package for python 2 + 3 modules? Ghislain Vaillant <ghisvail@gmail.com> - 2018-03-13 10:00 +0100
Re: Where to put docs of a -doc package for python 2 + 3 modules? "W. Martin Borgert" <debacle@debian.org> - 2018-03-13 10:00 +0100
Re: Where to put docs of a -doc package for python 2 + 3 modules? Ole Streicher <olebole@debian.org> - 2018-03-13 10:30 +0100
Re: Where to put docs of a -doc package for python 2 + 3 modules? Thomas Goirand <zigo@debian.org> - 2018-03-13 14:10 +0100
csiph-web