Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.debian.maint.python > #10412

Re: Questions about salsa and Git

Path csiph.com!aioe.org!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod
From Simon McVittie <smcv@debian.org>
Newsgroups linux.debian.maint.python
Subject Re: Questions about salsa and Git
Date Tue, 10 Apr 2018 13:20:01 +0200
Message-ID <vCZtD-5YC-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <vCVT3-366-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <vCZ0B-5ui-3@gated-at.bofh.it>
X-Mailbox-Line From debian-python-request@lists.debian.org Tue Apr 10 11:12:09 2018
Old-Return-Path <smcv@debian.org>
X-Amavis-Spam-Status No, score=-5.9 tagged_above=-10000 required=5.3 tests=[BAYES_00=-2, FOURLA=0.1, GMAIL=1, LDO_WHITELIST=-5, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
X-Policyd-Weight using cached result; rate: -5
MIME-Version 1.0
Content-Type text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Disposition inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding 8bit
User-Agent Mutt/1.9.4 (2018-02-28)
X-Mailing-List <debian-python@lists.debian.org> archive/latest/15812
List-ID <debian-python.lists.debian.org>
List-URL <https://lists.debian.org/debian-python/>
List-Archive https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/20180410111127.GA19894@espresso.pseudorandom.co.uk
Approved robomod@news.nic.it
Lines 28
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway
Sender robomod@news.nic.it
X-Original-Date Tue, 10 Apr 2018 12:11:27 +0100
X-Original-Message-ID <20180410111127.GA19894@espresso.pseudorandom.co.uk>
X-Original-References <CAOTq_2WbeVYGbaCHD_5hZ2UOnqyFr=W_4g2+LKwcy1Lc=A7dFg@mail.gmail.com> <AA326483-7C78-42F6-8C58-58C30C3C43C5@kitterman.com>
Xref csiph.com linux.debian.maint.python:10412

Show key headers only | View raw


On Tue, 10 Apr 2018 at 10:41:41 +0000, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> On April 10, 2018 7:24:18 AM UTC, "Guðjón Guðjónsson" <gudjon.i.gudjonsson@gmail.com> wrote:
> >Following the advice on
> >https://wiki.debian.org/Python/GitPackaging
> 
> Use this instead:
> https://wiki.debian.org/Python/GitPackagingPQ

Is this now official policy for new/updated/converted Python modules
maintained by DPMT?

Is it official policy for new/updated/converted Python applications
maintained by PAPT?

At the moment each of those pages says that the Python teams have chosen
the relevant packaging system and that the other packaging system is
forbidden, which is confusing at best.

If there is consensus that gbp pq + DEP 14 is recommended for Python
packages and the older git-dpm setup is deprecated, then anyone with a
wiki account can fix those pages, but I for one don't want to make those
edits until someone who can speak for the team specifically says it.

(I'd like to convert tap.py to gbp pq as soon as it isn't considered to
be hostile to do so.)

Thanks,
    smcv

Back to linux.debian.maint.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Questions about salsa and Git Guðjón Guðjónsson <gudjon.i.gudjonsson@gmail.com> - 2018-04-10 09:30 +0200
  Re: Questions about salsa and Git Scott Kitterman <debian@kitterman.com> - 2018-04-10 12:50 +0200
    Re: Questions about salsa and Git Simon McVittie <smcv@debian.org> - 2018-04-10 13:20 +0200
      Re: Questions about salsa and Git Brian May <bam@debian.org> - 2018-04-13 01:40 +0200
    Re: Questions about salsa and Git Sandro Tosi <morph@debian.org> - 2018-04-10 17:00 +0200
  Re: Questions about salsa and Git Scott Kitterman <debian@kitterman.com> - 2018-04-10 12:50 +0200

csiph-web