Groups > linux.debian.maint.python > #10073

Re: DPMT and git workflows

Path	csiph.com!news.redatomik.org!weretis.net!feeder4.news.weretis.net!newsfeed.CARNet.hr!news.spin.it!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod
From	IOhannes m zmölnig (Debian/GNU) <umlaeute@debian.org>
Newsgroups	linux.debian.maint.python
Subject	Re: DPMT and git workflows
Date	Fri, 19 Jan 2018 18:40:01 +0100
Message-ID	<v9INX-6lf-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References	<v93B7-4zG-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <v93B7-4zG-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <v94dP-54V-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <v9D1U-2HS-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <v9Dlf-2Oi-7@gated-at.bofh.it>
X-Original-To	debian-python@lists.debian.org
X-Mailbox-Line	From debian-python-request@lists.debian.org Fri Jan 19 17:36:17 2018
Old-Return-Path	<umlaeute@debian.org>
X-Amavis-Spam-Status	No, score=-11.9 tagged_above=-10000 required=5.3 tests=[BAYES_00=-2, FOURLA=0.1, LDO_WHITELIST=-5, PGPSIGNATURE=-5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
X-Policyd-Weight	using cached result; rate: -6.1
X-Greylist	delayed 1384 seconds by postgrey-1.36 at bendel; Fri, 19 Jan 2018 17:36:04 UTC
Organization	Debian
User-Agent	Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.5.2
MIME-Version	1.0
Content-Type	multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="lpK18rhXgcDBszdRIRGPNAhbm8zlXhyMn"
X-Mailing-List	<debian-python@lists.debian.org> archive/latest/15468
List-ID	<debian-python.lists.debian.org>
List-URL	<https://lists.debian.org/debian-python/>
List-Archive	https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/645bf656-81fa-9ea9-80c7-7ae08b4a90e8@debian.org
Approved	robomod@news.nic.it
Lines	79
Sender	robomod@news.nic.it
X-Original-Date	Fri, 19 Jan 2018 18:12:51 +0100
X-Original-Message-ID	<645bf656-81fa-9ea9-80c7-7ae08b4a90e8@debian.org>
X-Original-References	<CACttXDN-WMLhkKUNhVGZYAjZeLn-TsGapo+8qG=YhWW-zfhXmQ@mail.gmail.com> <CACttXDP8Ksp2N5sd4iB9UzKsbQ5-LrQJ0Z5YteFSFqvMMWw-DQ@mail.gmail.com> <20180117221441.hcgd4uzxrfgm4vtv@ulmo.domecek> <20180119112557.GB22609@mitya57.me> <20180119114559.GA8842@perpetual.pseudorandom.co.uk>
Xref	csiph.com linux.debian.maint.python:10073

Show key headers only | View raw

[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw

On 01/19/2018 12:45 PM, Simon McVittie wrote:
> On Fri, 19 Jan 2018 at 14:25:57 +0300, Dmitry Shachnev wrote:
>> I think for new packages it is better to use gbp-pq based workflow:
>> https://wiki.debian.org/Python/GitPackagingPQ
> 
> Is there consensus that the gbp-pq workflow is now allowed? I only
> maintain one package in DPMT (tap.py) and every time I upload it I have
> to remind myself how git-dpm works, so I'd like to switch it over to
> gbp-pq as soon as I can.
> 
> Relatedly, Alioth is going to be shut down at some point, with git
> repositories frozen and made read-only, so it would seem a good idea to
> start migrating git packaging to salsa.debian.org before that happens.
> python-modules-team and python-apps-team groups, perhaps? I can create
> a python-modules-team group and migrate tap.py as a sample if people
> would like to see an example package.
> 

should we keep the structure of putting all packages into a separate
subdir (aka "sub-group").

i was also thinking about creating a single python-team group with a
PAPT and a DPMT subgroup, but apart from aesthetics i cannot think of
any good reason to do so. it probably creates more trouble than it is worth.

gfards
IOhannes

Thread

FYI: Fwd: RFS: pygithub/1.35-1[ITA] "eamanu15 ." <emmanuelarias30@gmail.com> - 2018-01-17 22:40 +0100
  Re: FYI: Fwd: RFS: pygithub/1.35-1[ITA] Filip Pytloun <filip@pytloun.cz> - 2018-01-17 23:20 +0100
    Re: FYI: Fwd: RFS: pygithub/1.35-1[ITA] Dmitry Shachnev <mitya57@debian.org> - 2018-01-19 12:30 +0100
      Re: DPMT and git workflows Simon McVittie <smcv@debian.org> - 2018-01-19 12:50 +0100
        Re: DPMT and git workflows IOhannes m zmölnig (Debian/GNU)  <umlaeute@debian.org> - 2018-01-19 18:40 +0100
          Re: DPMT and git workflows Stuart Prescott <stuart@debian.org> - 2018-01-20 00:30 +0100

csiph-web