Groups > linux.debian.maint.python > #9940

Re: pyasn1

Path	csiph.com!news.mixmin.net!weretis.net!feeder4.news.weretis.net!newsfeed.CARNet.hr!news.spin.it!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod
From	Vincent Bernat <bernat@debian.org>
Newsgroups	linux.debian.maint.python, linux.debian.bugs.dist
Subject	Re: pyasn1
Date	Sun, 15 Oct 2017 15:30:02 +0200
Message-ID	<uAR9n-78O-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References	<uAucN-10o-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <uADSN-7kJ-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
X-Original-To	Brian May <bam@debian.org>
X-Mailbox-Line	From debian-python-request@lists.debian.org Sun Oct 15 13:20:00 2017
Old-Return-Path	<bernat@debian.org>
X-Amavis-Spam-Status	No, score=-10 tagged_above=-10000 required=5.3 tests=[BAYES_00=-2, LDO_WHITELIST=-5, ONEWORD=2, PGPSIGNATURE=-5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
X-Policyd-Weight	using cached result; rate: -5
Organization	Debian
Mail-Followup-To	Brian May <bam@debian.org>, debian-python@lists.debian.org, 872724@bugs.debian.org
User-Agent	Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.2 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version	1.0
Content-Type	multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
X-Mailing-List	<debian-python@lists.debian.org> archive/latest/15322
List-ID	<debian-python.lists.debian.org>
List-URL	<https://lists.debian.org/debian-python/>
List-Archive	https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/m34lr0sg4m.fsf@luffy.cx
Approved	robomod@news.nic.it
Lines	54
Sender	robomod@news.nic.it
X-Original-Cc	debian-python@lists.debian.org, 872724@bugs.debian.org
X-Original-Date	Sun, 15 Oct 2017 15:19:21 +0200
X-Original-Message-ID	<m34lr0sg4m.fsf@luffy.cx>
X-Original-References	<m3fualsx8e.fsf@luffy.cx> <87h8v1b9y8.fsf@prune.linuxpenguins.xyz>
Xref	csiph.com linux.debian.maint.python:9940 linux.debian.bugs.dist:856676

Cross-posted to 2 groups.

Show key headers only | View raw

[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw

 ❦ 15 octobre 2017 10:12 +1100, Brian May <bam@debian.org> :

>> pyasn1 is currently at version 0.1.9. The current version is
>> 0.3.7. There is a bug report asking for a new version:
>>
>>  https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=872724
>>
>> Should a transition be opened for such a packet (this is not usual to
>> have transition for Python packages, but there are many reverse
>> dependencies to this one)?
>
> Is the new version likely to break dependencies? If so, a transition
> might be good.

Changelog says:

Iterator protocol support implemented for all container types. Warning,
warning, warning: this change may potentially affect backward
compatibility when:

 - user class overrides __getitem__() without overriding __iter__()

 - when user code iterates over SEQUENCE object to get its components
   (now keys will be yielded)

No other mention of breaking compatibility. I would say, it shouldn't.
-- 
Make the coupling between modules visible.
            - The Elements of Programming Style (Kernighan & Plauger)

Back to linux.debian.maint.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

pyasn1 Vincent Bernat <bernat@debian.org> - 2017-10-14 15:00 +0200
  Re: pyasn1 Brian May <bam@debian.org> - 2017-10-15 01:20 +0200
    Re: pyasn1 Vincent Bernat <bernat@debian.org> - 2017-10-15 15:30 +0200

csiph-web