Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.maint.python > #9583
| Path | csiph.com!news.redatomik.org!aioe.org!news.servidellagleba.it!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod |
|---|---|
| From | Sandro Tosi <morph@debian.org> |
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.maint.python |
| Subject | Re: python3 statsmodels? |
| Date | Wed, 21 Jun 2017 18:20:01 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <tUQwh-8qD-3@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <tUiNX-3FC-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <tUtzH-238-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <tUPJT-7QM-7@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| X-Original-To | kamaraju kusumanchi <raju.mailinglists@gmail.com> |
| X-Mailbox-Line | From debian-python-request@lists.debian.org Wed Jun 21 16:10:16 2017 |
| Old-Return-Path | <sandro.tosi@gmail.com> |
| X-Amavis-Spam-Status | No, score=-5.999 tagged_above=-10000 required=5.3 tests=[BAYES_00=-2, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, LDO_WHITELIST=-5, MONOTONE_WORDS_2_15=1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no |
| X-Policyd-Weight | using cached result; rate: -7 |
| Dkim-Signature | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:cc; bh=oMYMOl2TSNXygqA0xHBL00ui4fU9TKjwlvgt/2nZhtM=; b=E0/sbaOcHpgNWizgh3peEs1LoOdSfoaqY/m+DT62deMP2DJZ7M21tzOo33WeKQrtXy JtCEd3ERoebcPrf6//AL55ikXnnEElg5KOpjTQys6ZVgC9+OwDIiAxlIf5XjT1Yb0XUC F1kbWCr7l7z67UyHzFRze7qYhSE2mQd3rT/pgZMlXeQd3dMcIN7/HzY49HI8n5lXPzgC ocFAH2G7sJya4v6l7tYJyDnXrYXGKdTTGvuYmT+FPbym2irRRXyKdvy7lGZH4pekcbL8 Wl32HA7yTVCUj2UocY1PBRy+A9XFq8JIl6kmejs0fZrLrYSFImuZr3Rb8f0AiYN+9dh9 2Pow== |
| X-Google-Dkim-Signature | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from :date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=oMYMOl2TSNXygqA0xHBL00ui4fU9TKjwlvgt/2nZhtM=; b=oJRC7MsBe4eg257OukH3OyFuskwAov95bAxeeb0F6AdgOpjEpfggYDZ8w+aDCdfDhC KZZ84WDrgArhk+kIXgeimURS48AR236aki1T62XLxvLB7zB00UsGTKJG/kOZrCeREwAH ZbRiPf8zL9lIuVXpyjZykSvAP0vLc87sws9dCsvZIa1gRlBamcE8u/8lWwuBKk9PO868 UKwcDbRdp98Tn2+TWIZcwoO4gqo8Ciq+HPdpiDRAAoBhYThzUAJdeM6BiODbpu4E2Hbk A21d+IilDo0rLD/lVsB+sZ5jujFtuKGnT82+mJMjCiMY3XdcmIgIBYMMl/1vvMTyU/Ua Vjug== |
| X-Gm-Message-State | AKS2vOz0/jgGmmjLCOKJHj99OGD4tIAQHXoTIuMm8lnaONXd0cnrCCRv 0U1DV9mULFaKl/mth0o6S6h6DKBPwy/aKf0= |
| X-Received | by 10.176.2.84 with SMTP id 78mr19956009uas.80.1498061398168; Wed, 21 Jun 2017 09:09:58 -0700 (PDT) |
| MIME-Version | 1.0 |
| Sender | robomod@news.nic.it |
| X-Google-Sender-Auth | mkRZ03W3-PDGAT5dppjNkXLvVJ4 |
| Content-Type | text/plain; charset="UTF-8" |
| X-Mailing-List | <debian-python@lists.debian.org> archive/latest/14961 |
| List-ID | <debian-python.lists.debian.org> |
| List-URL | <https://lists.debian.org/debian-python/> |
| List-Archive | https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/CAB4XWXyWTEd_-50qA0M6kdRuLA1pZeb5a+TBUsKB2Du5Dkoytg@mail.gmail.com |
| Approved | robomod@news.nic.it |
| Lines | 19 |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
| X-Original-Cc | Debian Science Team <debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org>, debian-python <debian-python@lists.debian.org> |
| X-Original-Date | Wed, 21 Jun 2017 12:09:27 -0400 |
| X-Original-Message-ID | <CAB4XWXyWTEd_-50qA0M6kdRuLA1pZeb5a+TBUsKB2Du5Dkoytg@mail.gmail.com> |
| X-Original-References | <CABpbYadg19nzCdqWmymLudHEUJKZL9b042RHZS8uBMzjGgbtvA@mail.gmail.com> <CAB4XWXxtPJ2=WsgBQ9XTYgxWGqdv6L69+k6szSP33nZkJrqoXQ@mail.gmail.com> <CABpbYadEWWT9iJQhFCpS5MzHFwc5_YC6NU6=g5VUzeODs_Jwbw@mail.gmail.com> |
| X-Original-Sender | sandro.tosi@gmail.com |
| Xref | csiph.com linux.debian.maint.python:9583 |
Show key headers only | View raw
>> statsmodels is maintained by Debian science team >> (https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/statsmodels) so i suggest to contact >> them directly (CCed them here) > > Why? Is there any specific reason? Wouldn't it make sense to bring > everything under one umbrella. because if you want to get an answer to your question you have to ask it to the right recipient. Currently statsmodels is maintained by another team, so the point of bring all under the same umbrella is out of topic. i suggest you to bring your ideas to the current maintainers (Yaroslav already replied, and more in general the Debian Science Team is the recipient you want to contact for statsmodels) -- Sandro "morph" Tosi My website: http://sandrotosi.me/ Me at Debian: http://wiki.debian.org/SandroTosi G+: https://plus.google.com/u/0/+SandroTosi
Back to linux.debian.maint.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
python3 statsmodels? kamaraju kusumanchi <raju.mailinglists@gmail.com> - 2017-06-20 06:20 +0200
Re: python3 statsmodels? Sandro Tosi <morph@debian.org> - 2017-06-20 17:50 +0200
Re: python3 statsmodels? Yaroslav Halchenko <yoh@debian.org> - 2017-06-20 18:30 +0200
Re: python3 statsmodels? kamaraju kusumanchi <raju.mailinglists@gmail.com> - 2017-06-21 17:40 +0200
Re: python3 statsmodels? kamaraju kusumanchi <raju.mailinglists@gmail.com> - 2017-06-21 17:30 +0200
Re: python3 statsmodels? Sandro Tosi <morph@debian.org> - 2017-06-21 18:20 +0200
csiph-web