Groups > linux.debian.maint.python > #9551

Re: [Python-modules-team] partd_0.3.8-1_source.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

Path	csiph.com!news.mixmin.net!aioe.org!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod
From	Ghislain Vaillant <ghisvail@gmail.com>
Newsgroups	linux.debian.maint.python
Subject	Re: [Python-modules-team] partd_0.3.8-1_source.changes ACCEPTED into unstable
Date	Fri, 02 Jun 2017 18:00:01 +0200
Message-ID	<tNX9v-37F-17@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References	<tNWQ9-314-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <tNWQ9-314-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
X-Mailbox-Line	From debian-python-request@lists.debian.org Fri Jun 2 15:56:36 2017
Old-Return-Path	<ghisvail@gmail.com>
X-Amavis-Spam-Status	No, score=-5.839 tagged_above=-10000 required=5.3 tests=[BAYES_00=-2, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, LDO_WHITELIST=-5, MURPHY_DRUGS_REL8=0.02, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SARE_LWSHORTT=1.24] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
X-Policyd-Weight	using cached result; rate: -7
Dkim-Signature	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=message-id:subject:from:to:date:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding; bh=60/UeWJA0V7/4I0KHlm6VzGR1NMhnp7J4VIB9e5l6pg=; b=HnMiOQjbnb2YBVz3miwCU5geytclMVA3Nqgg1w1JYM2D0zvHUbMBHf1yfmsUrMZmoW jcJuFacWMvB70JB7ICbLwnUrQbYGHrI6aapS5WoC8OpD2Ywz4XLhhQTq9+ezNGTzNPz6 qNZ2UZUoP6bTs7P5/pS4IxzlE+yDTUYMGgBuEZqPCyOtPhaxCmS7tNmyWXVKTnbM5TBX 2u7WYpeUGVz1UTBTuWq5wFZ/FFH3CU5bnNkXak9UYPmjr1zS4hVxfURUZqseC2+0CxNN wQSlOYku2pG26kIA1MECYmKX/trD8Bsf3Mw5ehAmtoo2e0b5+334aaJi92VSJSLuafgT HLNQ==
X-Google-Dkim-Signature	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:subject:from:to:date:in-reply-to :references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=60/UeWJA0V7/4I0KHlm6VzGR1NMhnp7J4VIB9e5l6pg=; b=KRDUTmohVsnG/W0xBfTP3qmVup7GFD43jjYsH55Xgxzx/0A3Ms7o9iZkmqeIOinDlj i89XeST0EanrZEFLvMr/5VX9lm9rJFPFEIDUO91jun1OyxGjaFf5hnBU/KFDm2AizWVH UJOyugGArLAyKMwT1Jujd/kbLHWAfrlHoUsS7888V6sNK0Dg1Tt+YfZEOkkm4/pcjkmY bK2kaVrMeR4wkr79OU9tIZt/8cT/U8AMoeUNXhfcvdscrCjl3fD08JYl/U0rsk4w9Pil wzR16eAkSKtkvscvQp/TbYW8y5c2deIGXd8hSgMfCMp+vArQ6pwjNOOSqaYucRMlpop6 O2VA==
X-Gm-Message-State	AODbwcAxQO48gGlcuUhYApRAutKZpZipcPHC37Z686DK7mLCY6IIoX81 fqIr48ogN/fL45IC4iw=
X-Received	by 10.223.164.220 with SMTP id h28mr6459375wrb.24.1496418980631; Fri, 02 Jun 2017 08:56:20 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type	text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
X-Mailer	Evolution 3.22.6-1
MIME-Version	1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding	7bit
X-Mailing-List	<debian-python@lists.debian.org> archive/latest/14928
List-ID	<debian-python.lists.debian.org>
List-URL	<https://lists.debian.org/debian-python/>
List-Archive	https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/1496418978.9378.1.camel@gmail.com
Approved	robomod@news.nic.it
Lines	45
Organization	linux.* mail to news gateway
Sender	robomod@news.nic.it
X-Original-Date	Fri, 02 Jun 2017 16:56:18 +0100
X-Original-Message-ID	<1496418978.9378.1.camel@gmail.com>
X-Original-References	<E1dGfRz-0002KH-N2@fasolo.debian.org> <20170602113552.4dffe63f@subdivisions.wooz.org>
Xref	csiph.com linux.debian.maint.python:9551

Show key headers only | View raw

On Fri, 2017-06-02 at 11:35 -0400, Barry Warsaw wrote:
> Hi Diane,
> 
> On Jun 02, 2017, at 05:48 AM, Debian FTP Masters wrote:
> 
> > partd (0.3.8-1) unstable; urgency=medium
> > .
> >   * Switch from git-dpm to gbp
> 
> I may be misremembering our previous discussions on the topic, but we all know
> that in the long term we want to convert off of git-dpm.

Indeed.

> My recollection was that in the short term, "officially" we want to
> opportunistically convert packages as an experiment, and to work out the steps
> needed, so that at some time in the future, we'd mass migrate the bulk of our
> packages.

Correct. However, I have collaborated with Diane on some of her
packages (dask) and the git-dpm setup was broken. So, I took this
opportunity to get rid of git-dpm and switch to gbp with her approval.

> I'm curious, did you follow the steps outlined in
> https://wiki.debian.org/Python/GitPackagingPQ to do the conversion?  (Search
> for "Converting git-dpm to gbp pq") or did you follow some other process?  Are
> you adopting gbp-pq for your own workflow?  Do you have any insights that will
> help others convert, or that can guide our future mass migration?  Is there
> anything you can add to the wiki page to help others when they
> opportunistically convert?

I can't speak for herself for partd.

For dask, the patch queue was not recognized by git-dpm, so the source
tree was essentially in patch non-applied mode. The conversion was then
straightforward: delete .git-dpm, add gbp.conf and do a round trip of
gbp pq import / export.

> For the team: should we just allow opportunistic conversions and live with a
> mixed git-dpm/gbp state in our packages for a while?

IMO, I believe it is not the end of the world, but I am obviously
biased.

Ghis

Back to linux.debian.maint.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Re: [Python-modules-team] partd_0.3.8-1_source.changes ACCEPTED  into unstable Barry Warsaw <barry@debian.org> - 2017-06-02 17:40 +0200
  Re: [Python-modules-team] partd_0.3.8-1_source.changes ACCEPTED  into unstable Ghislain Vaillant <ghisvail@gmail.com> - 2017-06-02 18:00 +0200

csiph-web