Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.maint.python > #8890
| Path | csiph.com!news.mixmin.net!newsreader4.netcologne.de!news.netcologne.de!fu-berlin.de!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod |
|---|---|
| From | Scott Kitterman <debian@kitterman.com> |
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.maint.python |
| Subject | Re: can we disable the bounce kicker? Re: confirm <string> |
| Date | Fri, 23 Sep 2016 20:10:02 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <skD58-7dw-29@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <sfQPo-QB-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <sfSRc-252-17@gated-at.bofh.it> <skzuy-4Kq-23@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| X-Original-To | debian-python@lists.debian.org |
| X-Mailbox-Line | From debian-python-request@lists.debian.org Fri Sep 23 18:01:41 2016 |
| Old-Return-Path | <debian@kitterman.com> |
| X-Amavis-Spam-Status | No, score=-7 tagged_above=-10000 required=5.3 tests=[BAYES_00=-2, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FOURLA=0.1, LDO_WHITELIST=-5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no |
| X-Policyd-Weight | NOT_IN_SBL_XBL_SPAMHAUS=-1.5 NOT_IN_BL_NJABL=-1.5 CL_IP_EQ_HELO_IP=-2 (check from: .kitterman. - helo: .mailout03.controlledmail. - helo-domain: .controlledmail.) FROM/MX_MATCHES_NOT_HELO(DOMAIN)=0; rate: -5 |
| Dkim-Signature | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=kitterman.com; s=201409; t=1474653657; bh=SopRLN+XnFTvu9t5+ne1W/ToxuOvaAj5yUUGN0YASBk=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=xZWi+BizszpnbNqhAO+HCEW0Icd6tGLTCW3Yq5m+/ZPbLNs6x+NC0z1Syozz3d7NE cO1uQT0J9CZxde5hlb7XvVvc35bt+J4pmlMVy9bd6ARkpE0+5xdElfy6OQHH/feEMG W2s94m+OnxfTkROZ8x4+qUM0fitraWIRav/dAWGQ= |
| User-Agent | KMail/4.13.3 (Linux/3.13.0-95-generic; KDE/4.13.3; x86_64; ; ) |
| MIME-Version | 1.0 |
| Content-Transfer-Encoding | 7Bit |
| Content-Type | text/plain; charset="us-ascii" |
| X-Mailing-List | <debian-python@lists.debian.org> archive/latest/14232 |
| List-ID | <debian-python.lists.debian.org> |
| List-URL | <https://lists.debian.org/debian-python/> |
| List-Archive | https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/34297086.0VDz77Ami0@kitterma-e6430 |
| Approved | robomod@news.nic.it |
| Lines | 21 |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
| Sender | robomod@news.nic.it |
| X-Original-Date | Fri, 23 Sep 2016 14:00:57 -0400 |
| X-Original-Message-ID | <34297086.0VDz77Ami0@kitterma-e6430> |
| X-Original-References | <CAB4XWXzJumTLOn3cer-s-Czz9nOqxk6PCTaBzFUizO2Bgh4GPQ@mail.gmail.com> <20160910153412.efnwyunnwe4vfyqk@nuc> <e01e5248-f42d-31f6-54c3-0fec006fe19f@debian.org> |
| Xref | csiph.com linux.debian.maint.python:8890 |
Show key headers only | View raw
On Friday, September 23, 2016 04:15:23 PM Thomas Goirand wrote: > On 09/10/2016 05:34 PM, Santiago Vila wrote: > > The "[Python-modules-team]" thing in the subject is probably enough to > > break the DKIM signature. > > I don't believe DKIM signature is done on the header+body. If I'm not > mistaking, it's done only in the body of the mail, because each SMTP > server on the way to your inbox can add a "Received:" field, so you can > trace the email. > > So yes, footers in emails can break stuff, but not mangling subject, > which is part of the metadata. Not correct. In DKIM there is a header hash and a body hash that are calculated separately. If either changes, then signature verification will fail. You can control which header fields are included, but ~everyone includes subject. Scott K
Back to linux.debian.maint.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
can we disable the bounce kicker? Re: confirm <string> Sandro Tosi <morph@debian.org> - 2016-09-10 15:50 +0200
Re: can we disable the bounce kicker? Re: confirm <string> Santiago Vila <sanvila@unex.es> - 2016-09-10 16:50 +0200
Re: can we disable the bounce kicker? Re: confirm <string> Sandro Tosi <morph@debian.org> - 2016-09-10 17:20 +0200
Re: can we disable the bounce kicker? Re: confirm <string> Santiago Vila <sanvila@unex.es> - 2016-09-10 18:00 +0200
Re: can we disable the bounce kicker? Re: confirm <string> Mattia Rizzolo <mattia@debian.org> - 2016-09-10 18:30 +0200
Re: can we disable the bounce kicker? Re: confirm <string> Sandro Tosi <morph@debian.org> - 2016-09-10 18:40 +0200
Re: can we disable the bounce kicker? Re: confirm <string> "W. Martin Borgert" <debacle@debian.org> - 2016-09-10 20:50 +0200
Re: can we disable the bounce kicker? Re: confirm <string> Thomas Goirand <zigo@debian.org> - 2016-09-23 16:20 +0200
Re: can we disable the bounce kicker? Re: confirm <string> Santiago Vila <sanvila@unex.es> - 2016-09-23 16:40 +0200
Re: can we disable the bounce kicker? Re: confirm <string> Vincent Bernat <bernat@debian.org> - 2016-09-23 17:00 +0200
Re: can we disable the bounce kicker? Re: confirm <string> Scott Kitterman <debian@kitterman.com> - 2016-09-23 20:10 +0200
Re: can we disable the bounce kicker? Re: confirm <string> Barry Warsaw <barry@debian.org> - 2016-09-10 20:50 +0200
Re: can we disable the bounce kicker? Re: confirm <string> Barry Warsaw <barry@debian.org> - 2016-09-10 20:40 +0200
Re: can we disable the bounce kicker? Re: confirm <string> "Paul R. Tagliamonte" <paultag@gmail.com> - 2016-09-10 21:00 +0200
Re: can we disable the bounce kicker? Re: confirm <string> Sandro Tosi <morph@debian.org> - 2016-09-10 21:30 +0200
Re: can we disable the bounce kicker? Re: confirm <string> Paul Wise <pabs@debian.org> - 2016-09-11 05:00 +0200
Re: can we disable the bounce kicker? Re: confirm <string> Sandro Tosi <morph@debian.org> - 2016-09-11 10:50 +0200
Re: can we disable the bounce kicker? Re: confirm <string> Mattia Rizzolo <mattia@debian.org> - 2016-09-11 11:00 +0200
Re: can we disable the bounce kicker? Re: confirm <string> Sandro Tosi <morph@debian.org> - 2016-09-11 11:50 +0200
Re: can we disable the bounce kicker? Re: confirm <string> Jakub Wilk <jwilk@debian.org> - 2016-09-11 21:40 +0200
Re: can we disable the bounce kicker? Re: confirm <string> Sandro Tosi <morph@debian.org> - 2016-09-15 14:20 +0200
Re: can we disable the bounce kicker? Re: confirm <string> Barry Warsaw <barry@debian.org> - 2016-09-11 20:30 +0200
csiph-web