Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > linux.debian.maint.python > #8211

Re: Python Policy: Things to consider for Stretch

Path csiph.com!aioe.org!gothmog.csi.it!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod
From Paul Wise <pabs@debian.org>
Newsgroups linux.debian.maint.python
Subject Re: Python Policy: Things to consider for Stretch
Date Tue, 16 Feb 2016 02:00:03 +0100
Message-ID <r2C9J-dV-15@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <qTpEL-7eF-19@gated-at.bofh.it> <qTSQp-28S-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <r2Bnj-8m8-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <r2C01-aC-7@gated-at.bofh.it>
X-Original-To debian-python@lists.debian.org
X-Mailbox-Line From debian-python-request@lists.debian.org Tue Feb 16 00:54:45 2016
Old-Return-Path <paul.is.wise@gmail.com>
X-Amavis-Spam-Status No, score=-7.448 tagged_above=-10000 required=5.3 tests=[BAYES_00=-2, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, LDO_WHITELIST=-5, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
X-Policyd-Weight using cached result; rate: -7
Dkim-Signature v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type; bh=WEKj5zbS9nSlWsHFfOFiQE0tqXOHCWxoJZ8rzyrXBKQ=; b=QqIUbvzdXWjk1iKMFLKyzsNVByIGhgMfVHlAoTeB59+cI54DyqsFFBDLiNwSsfqof6 NzxZkt6a4ZuC22+6Ib05A/TETpkrMZsPfuKgs1jIkjTvKY68g0tuRQTJ7VtDccFSYPDy 4rATNhY9aO4+01Xus2DdRNOLuj4Ma9Oz8QnLuRPuaUm7/48/Gbg7bnE924OHiv8J7OPu ZMHYWTM9H8pgh4nHEVuoxEW0N8hrUmL71MQ70xOpGqmNaaFJeOIoAetCsxGFCybfDaCW DpuFIb5Kmvhwh2kWdaL4hMWiFWI4dE5I/ZdIVSOcPNfO1MuKI/tVjrYTGaD8tjZ5v6Pg 7AGA==
X-Google-Dkim-Signature v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=WEKj5zbS9nSlWsHFfOFiQE0tqXOHCWxoJZ8rzyrXBKQ=; b=OdIZHtlB2psv6h8mp7pfUe4+HLlvXeg7YXAsDmlrWZRVhMOzxGkiRK8ZZgdkJjVV/g 6qOtKRUgqQUQu1UZrFkT5o1GBP0cg06WlhRqvAc0GBC4Y2eARvLlUmv4w0D3XeszE3MQ AzpwdIV33qWhK88yRtHjrRoxv0yThmlHODIwCYUn/ClGnzo9YSYgfSRsm8yfLhd0okEj SMYsgFRetu+lHiGCjgxWnOl0NoddGTWZEePpraY1ulGVT9ilMYM1ISZEUw43XGkt+8ek pEQnO++wn+Ywmrx3TiDjKWmyHPEboAaMgHxenFdC8YC9SKTyKv4ha8hu4Ogw5wblknOs MYOg==
X-Gm-Message-State AG10YOTozj9fiUf87EPxzwhvObFpCJ+XO9cM0LfCuqhdYavBFHvEV9WYdm8sIoVMohCDSz2PChMPGvCkPo9IOQ==
MIME-Version 1.0
X-Received by 10.28.111.202 with SMTP id c71mr16743578wmi.77.1455584068513; Mon, 15 Feb 2016 16:54:28 -0800 (PST)
Sender robomod@news.nic.it
X-Google-Sender-Auth zMIFT5Xad-_fxJ-M60xMU4ei-7k
Content-Type text/plain; charset=UTF-8
X-Mailing-List <debian-python@lists.debian.org> archive/latest/13536
List-ID <debian-python.lists.debian.org>
List-URL <https://lists.debian.org/debian-python/>
List-Archive https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/CAKTje6Fza0NSeEbr46y5fyfqfpX-k9xTnycoHYxa_5JVe7kM-A@mail.gmail.com
Approved robomod@news.nic.it
Lines 19
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway
X-Original-Date Tue, 16 Feb 2016 11:54:28 +1100
X-Original-Message-ID <CAKTje6Fza0NSeEbr46y5fyfqfpX-k9xTnycoHYxa_5JVe7kM-A@mail.gmail.com>
X-Original-References <1705132.RfqMtW1P2v@kitterma-e6430> <20160122175519.5cb7542e@anarchist.wooz.org> <CAKTje6Gb97iP_msR03xUhy-RQxTvzA5vM1j7pkxsq-NfJEzMGA@mail.gmail.com> <20160215194238.4e788bc1@subdivisions.wooz.org>
X-Original-Sender paul.is.wise@gmail.com
Xref csiph.com linux.debian.maint.python:8211

Show key headers only | View raw

On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 11:42 AM, Barry Warsaw wrote:

> I don't remember exactly why we called it 'site-packages' ...

Thanks for the history :)

I always thought it strange to put site- in /usr/local since
/usr/local already implies site/system-wide packages. Same for dist-
since /usr already implies distribution packages. I find it weird that
site- gets used in ~/ since they are clearly user packages not
site/system-wide packages.

Any thoughts on that?

-- 
bye,
pabs

https://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise

Back to linux.debian.maint.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Python Policy: Things to consider for Stretch Scott Kitterman <debian@kitterman.com> - 2016-01-21 16:50 +0100
  Re: Python Policy: Things to consider for Stretch Barry Warsaw <barry@debian.org> - 2016-01-23 00:00 +0100
    Re: Python Policy: Things to consider for Stretch Scott Kitterman <debian@kitterman.com> - 2016-01-23 09:40 +0100
      Re: Python Policy: Things to consider for Stretch Barry Warsaw <barry@debian.org> - 2016-01-24 03:00 +0100
        Re: Python Policy: Things to consider for Stretch Scott Kitterman <debian@kitterman.com> - 2016-01-24 04:10 +0100
          Re: Python Policy: Things to consider for Stretch Ben Finney <ben+debian@benfinney.id.au> - 2016-01-24 06:40 +0100
            Re: Python Policy: Things to consider for Stretch Scott Kitterman <debian@kitterman.com> - 2016-01-24 07:10 +0100
            Re: Python Policy: Things to consider for Stretch Barry Warsaw <barry@debian.org> - 2016-01-24 19:10 +0100
            Re: Python Policy: Things to consider for Stretch Ben Finney <ben+debian@benfinney.id.au> - 2016-01-26 07:00 +0100
            Re: Python Policy: Things to consider for Stretch Dmitry Shachnev <mitya57@debian.org> - 2016-01-26 18:00 +0100
              Re: Python Policy: Things to consider for Stretch Ben Finney <ben+debian@benfinney.id.au> - 2016-01-27 04:40 +0100
                Re: Python Policy: Things to consider for Stretch Scott Kitterman <debian@kitterman.com> - 2016-01-27 05:20 +0100
                Re: Python Policy: Things to consider for Stretch Ben Finney <ben+debian@benfinney.id.au> - 2016-01-27 10:50 +0100
            Re: Python Policy: Things to consider for Stretch Scott Kitterman <debian@kitterman.com> - 2016-01-29 23:30 +0100
              Re: Python Policy: Things to consider for Stretch Ben Finney <ben+debian@benfinney.id.au> - 2016-01-30 00:10 +0100
    Re: Python Policy: Things to consider for Stretch Paul Wise <pabs@debian.org> - 2016-02-16 01:10 +0100
      Re: Python Policy: Things to consider for Stretch Barry Warsaw <barry@debian.org> - 2016-02-16 01:50 +0100
        Re: Python Policy: Things to consider for Stretch Barry Warsaw <barry@debian.org> - 2016-02-16 02:00 +0100
        Re: Python Policy: Things to consider for Stretch Paul Wise <pabs@debian.org> - 2016-02-16 02:00 +0100
          Re: Python Policy: Things to consider for Stretch Barry Warsaw <barry@debian.org> - 2016-02-16 02:20 +0100
  Re: Python Policy: Things to consider for Stretch Ben Finney <ben+debian@benfinney.id.au> - 2016-01-24 06:50 +0100
    Re: Python Policy: Things to consider for Stretch Ben Finney <ben+debian@benfinney.id.au> - 2016-01-24 07:00 +0100
      Re: Python Policy: Things to consider for Stretch Scott Kitterman <debian@kitterman.com> - 2016-01-24 07:20 +0100
        Re: Python Policy: Things to consider for Stretch Ben Finney <ben+debian@benfinney.id.au> - 2016-01-25 06:00 +0100
          Re: Python Policy: Things to consider for Stretch Scott Kitterman <debian@kitterman.com> - 2016-01-25 06:30 +0100
    Re: Python Policy: Things to consider for Stretch Scott Kitterman <debian@kitterman.com> - 2016-01-24 07:10 +0100
  Re: Python Policy: Things to consider for Stretch Scott Kitterman <debian@kitterman.com> - 2016-02-15 23:30 +0100
    Re: Python Policy: Things to consider for Stretch Ben Finney <ben+debian@benfinney.id.au> - 2016-02-16 03:50 +0100

csiph-web