Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.maint.python > #8139
| Path | csiph.com!goblin1!goblin.stu.neva.ru!nntpspool01.opticnetworks.net!aioe.org!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod |
|---|---|
| From | Scott Kitterman <debian@kitterman.com> |
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.maint.python |
| Subject | Re: Amend Debian Python Proposal to Include More Python Metadata? |
| Date | Sat, 23 Jan 2016 09:20:02 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <qU1Am-8nr-13@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <qTopk-6qy-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <qTLYC-5Vz-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <qTMhZ-62g-15@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| X-Original-To | debian-python@lists.debian.org |
| X-Mailbox-Line | From debian-python-request@lists.debian.org Sat Jan 23 08:14:08 2016 |
| Old-Return-Path | <debian@kitterman.com> |
| X-Amavis-Spam-Status | No, score=-12.08 tagged_above=-10000 required=5.3 tests=[BAYES_00=-2, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, LDO_WHITELIST=-5, MURPHY_DRUGS_REL8=0.02, PGPSIGNATURE=-5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no |
| X-Policyd-Weight | using cached result; rate: -5 |
| Dkim-Signature | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=kitterman.com; s=201409; t=1453536830; bh=fIc5bxJR4YRvlmiDbkCryeQRsOjMBFDtf1ILNja7uOU=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=QBHHHUigkGXDs0Ik6T7QEPJQZ5xr1xuHOEEjG4EpqrsLe80ciCKSND9kNNtwwTjMM oWavr2gM61w3sp+VLwlZxeySVewMq2Hf4flEYC5268IcYLjDIdihdDP4RnQ1FxB0Fm qghx0HoraDNjthkcaEV5oTBi+NwenXbe8sOCj/7Q= |
| User-Agent | KMail/4.13.3 (Linux/3.13.0-71-generic; KDE/4.13.3; x86_64; ; ) |
| MIME-Version | 1.0 |
| Content-Type | multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart13715880.L4yDgUqJRh"; micalg="pgp-sha256"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" |
| X-Mailing-List | <debian-python@lists.debian.org> archive/latest/13462 |
| List-ID | <debian-python.lists.debian.org> |
| List-URL | <https://lists.debian.org/debian-python/> |
| List-Archive | https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/103827328.YrmivsYjLh@kitterma-e6430 |
| Approved | robomod@news.nic.it |
| Lines | 121 |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
| Sender | robomod@news.nic.it |
| X-Original-Date | Sat, 23 Jan 2016 03:13:48 -0500 |
| X-Original-Message-ID | <103827328.YrmivsYjLh@kitterma-e6430> |
| X-Original-References | <AF6B8D2B-28CC-419A-96DF-180E235DAE60@stufft.io> <20160122153607.GE11588@sar0.p1otr.com> <E54A8A20-09D4-4D04-BE78-C43E860761A5@stufft.io> |
| Xref | csiph.com linux.debian.maint.python:8139 |
Show key headers only | View raw
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw
On Friday, January 22, 2016 10:54:54 AM Donald Stufft wrote:
> > On Jan 22, 2016, at 10:36 AM, Piotr Ożarowski <piotr@debian.org> wrote:
> >
> > to be honest, I still don't know what you're asking for. What do you
> > want us to do? Patch 2.7's distutils?
>
> Essentially, ensure that setuptools not distutils is used in a setup.py.
> There are generally three kinds of setup.py files:
>
> 1) Ones that use setuptools unconditionally - These ones you just leave
> alone, they are already correct and you should already have a build depends
> on python-setuptools.
> 2) Ones that conditionally use setuptools - These ones you just need to
> satisfy whatever condition the setup.py uses to enable setuptools. Typically
> this is just checking if setuptools is importable but sometimes they use
> environment variables or similar.
> 3) Ones that use distutils unconditionally - These ones you switch to making
> them use setuptools instead of distutils.
>
> Now, that’s the high level overview, there’s an easier, more automatic way
> that could maybe just be added to pybuild (Not sure exactly how pybuild
> works) where instead of invoking the setup.py as:
>
> python setup.py install (or whatever commands/args you’re passing)
>
> You do it as (taken from pip):
>
> python -c "import setuptools,
> tokenize;__file__='$PWD/setup.py';exec(compile(getattr(tokenize, 'open',
> open)(__file__).read().replace('\r\n', '\n'), __file__, 'exec'))” install
> (or whatever commands/args you’re passing).
>
> The thing is kind of ugly, but that will install things using setuptools
> (just like pip does) regardless of if it imports setuptools or distutils in
> it’s setup.py file.
I decided to work on switching something I'm upstream for from distutils to
setuptools today (since hey, it's the future) and discovered there aren't
three kinds as listed above. There are four:
4) Packages that use distutils features that aren't available in setuptools
and break horribly when switched.
As a result, I think I global change is a non-starter.
In my particular case, here's what I have (snipped from setup.py) to install
man pages and a configuration file for an application written in python3:
data_files=[(os.path.join('share', 'man', 'man1'),
['policyd-spf.1']), (os.path.join('share', 'man', 'man5'),
['policyd-spf.conf.5']), (os.path.join('/etc', 'python-policyd-spf'),
['policyd-spf.conf']), (os.path.join('share', 'man', 'man5'),
['policyd-spf.peruser.5'])],
The man pages end up in build/bdist.linux-x86_64/egg as does the config file if
I remove the leading "/", but it still won't install it.
codesearch.debian.net claims 720 packages using data_files. I doubt they are
all using that pythonically, but they'll need to be checked for breakage.
The standard Google answer to the question of how to install man pages using
setuptools seems to be use distutils.
No way can we do any automagic switching.
Scott K
Back to linux.debian.maint.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Amend Debian Python Proposal to Include More Python Metadata? Donald Stufft <donald@stufft.io> - 2016-01-21 15:30 +0100
Re: Amend Debian Python Proposal to Include More Python Metadata? Paul Tagliamonte <paultag@debian.org> - 2016-01-21 15:50 +0100
Re: Amend Debian Python Proposal to Include More Python Metadata? Donald Stufft <donald@stufft.io> - 2016-01-21 16:10 +0100
Re: Amend Debian Python Proposal to Include More Python Metadata? Scott Kitterman <debian@kitterman.com> - 2016-01-21 17:00 +0100
Re: Amend Debian Python Proposal to Include More Python Metadata? Piotr Ożarowski <piotr@debian.org> - 2016-01-22 16:40 +0100
Re: Amend Debian Python Proposal to Include More Python Metadata? Donald Stufft <donald@stufft.io> - 2016-01-22 17:00 +0100
Re: Amend Debian Python Proposal to Include More Python Metadata? Piotr Ożarowski <piotr@debian.org> - 2016-01-22 17:20 +0100
Re: Amend Debian Python Proposal to Include More Python Metadata? Paul Tagliamonte <paultag@debian.org> - 2016-01-22 17:50 +0100
Re: Amend Debian Python Proposal to Include More Python Metadata? Piotr Ożarowski <piotr@debian.org> - 2016-01-22 18:20 +0100
Re: Amend Debian Python Proposal to Include More Python Metadata? Donald Stufft <donald@stufft.io> - 2016-01-22 18:00 +0100
Re: Amend Debian Python Proposal to Include More Python Metadata? Piotr Ożarowski <piotr@debian.org> - 2016-01-22 18:40 +0100
Re: Amend Debian Python Proposal to Include More Python Metadata? Scott Kitterman <debian@kitterman.com> - 2016-01-22 18:00 +0100
Re: Amend Debian Python Proposal to Include More Python Metadata? Donald Stufft <donald@stufft.io> - 2016-01-22 18:20 +0100
Re: Amend Debian Python Proposal to Include More Python Metadata? Scott Kitterman <debian@kitterman.com> - 2016-01-22 18:50 +0100
Re: Amend Debian Python Proposal to Include More Python Metadata? Fred Drake <fred@fdrake.net> - 2016-01-22 19:40 +0100
Re: Amend Debian Python Proposal to Include More Python Metadata? Fred Drake <fred@fdrake.net> - 2016-01-22 19:50 +0100
Re: Amend Debian Python Proposal to Include More Python Metadata? Scott Kitterman <debian@kitterman.com> - 2016-01-22 20:00 +0100
Re: Amend Debian Python Proposal to Include More Python Metadata? Scott Kitterman <debian@kitterman.com> - 2016-01-22 19:50 +0100
Re: Amend Debian Python Proposal to Include More Python Metadata? Scott Kitterman <debian@kitterman.com> - 2016-01-23 09:20 +0100
Re: Amend Debian Python Proposal to Include More Python Metadata? Scott Kitterman <debian@kitterman.com> - 2016-01-23 09:30 +0100
Re: Amend Debian Python Proposal to Include More Python Metadata? Barry Warsaw <barry@debian.org> - 2016-01-22 23:40 +0100
Re: Amend Debian Python Proposal to Include More Python Metadata? Donald Stufft <donald@stufft.io> - 2016-01-23 00:00 +0100
Re: Amend Debian Python Proposal to Include More Python Metadata? Barry Warsaw <barry@debian.org> - 2016-01-23 00:10 +0100
Re: Amend Debian Python Proposal to Include More Python Metadata? Donald Stufft <donald@stufft.io> - 2016-01-23 00:20 +0100
Re: Amend Debian Python Proposal to Include More Python Metadata? Scott Kitterman <debian@kitterman.com> - 2016-01-23 00:10 +0100
Re: Amend Debian Python Proposal to Include More Python Metadata? Donald Stufft <donald@stufft.io> - 2016-01-23 00:30 +0100
Re: Amend Debian Python Proposal to Include More Python Metadata? Scott Kitterman <debian@kitterman.com> - 2016-01-23 01:20 +0100
Re: Amend Debian Python Proposal to Include More Python Metadata? Donald Stufft <donald@stufft.io> - 2016-01-23 02:00 +0100
pip as distutils/setuptools/setup.py wrapper Piotr Ożarowski <piotr@debian.org> - 2016-01-26 19:30 +0100
csiph-web