Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.debian.maint.python > #15112

Re: Naming of python binary packages

Path csiph.com!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!fu-berlin.de!news.servidellagleba.it!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod
From Scott Kitterman <debian@kitterman.com>
Newsgroups linux.debian.maint.python, linux.debian.bugs.dist
Subject Re: Naming of python binary packages
Date Fri, 11 Aug 2023 17:30:01 +0200
Message-ID <H1Cfn-15UT-3@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <H1BCF-14HI-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <H1BCF-14HI-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
X-Original-To debian-python@lists.debian.org, 1023512@bugs.debian.org
X-Mailbox-Line From debian-python-request@lists.debian.org Fri Aug 11 15:20:16 2023
Old-Return-Path <debian@kitterman.com>
X-Amavis-Spam-Status No, score=-13.5 tagged_above=-10000 required=5.3 tests=[ATTENDEES_DBSPAM_BODY3=1, BAYES_00=-2, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, LDO_WHITELIST=-5, PGPSIGNATURE=-5, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
X-Policyd-Weight NOT_IN_SBL_XBL_SPAMHAUS=-1.5 CL_IP_EQ_HELO_IP=-2 (check from: .kitterman. - helo: .interserver.kitterman. - helo-domain: .kitterman.) FROM/MX_MATCHES_HELO(DOMAIN)=-2; rate: -5.5
MIME-Version 1.0
Content-Type multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart23231983.A069SYo8R0"; micalg="pgp-sha512"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
X-Mailing-List <debian-python@lists.debian.org> archive/latest/21032
List-ID <debian-python.lists.debian.org>
List-URL <https://lists.debian.org/debian-python/>
List-Archive https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/3242261.N7MWjgjm01@localhost
Approved robomod@news.nic.it
Lines 45
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway
Sender robomod@news.nic.it
X-Original-Date Fri, 11 Aug 2023 11:19:21 -0400
X-Original-Message-ID <3242261.N7MWjgjm01@localhost>
X-Original-References <fc616098-8899-a33a-0603-ce210d459461@infomaniak.com> <20230811144900.xyaim52ppum6kclb@satie.tumbleweed.org.za>
Xref csiph.com linux.debian.maint.python:15112 linux.debian.bugs.dist:1158139

Cross-posted to 2 groups.

Show key headers only | View raw


[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw

On Friday, August 11, 2023 10:49:00 AM EDT Stefano Rivera wrote:
> My vote would be strongly towards maintaining the status quo of the
> policy-defined names.
> 
> I don't see any strong argument for changing this.

Fully agreed.  In addition to the reasons you listed, renaming a lot of 
packages would require a trip through New.  I think we have enough backlog 
there without renaming a bunch of packages for a not very good reason.

Scott K

Back to linux.debian.maint.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Naming of python binary packages Stefano Rivera <stefanor@debian.org> - 2023-08-11 16:50 +0200
  Re: Naming of python binary packages Stefano Rivera <stefanor@debian.org> - 2023-08-11 17:20 +0200
  Re: Naming of python binary packages Scott Kitterman <debian@kitterman.com> - 2023-08-11 17:30 +0200
  Re: Naming of python binary packages Simon McVittie <smcv@debian.org> - 2023-08-11 18:20 +0200

csiph-web