Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.maint.python > #14998
| Path | csiph.com!fu-berlin.de!news.servidellagleba.it!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod |
|---|---|
| From | Andrey Rakhmatullin <wrar@wrar.name> |
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.maint.python |
| Subject | Re: Unittests writing to HOME (backintime) |
| Date | Wed, 29 Mar 2023 11:50:01 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <GeABj-fUeZ-7@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <GeySS-fT6i-9@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| X-Original-To | debian-python@lists.debian.org |
| X-Mailbox-Line | From debian-python-request@lists.debian.org Wed Mar 29 09:41:19 2023 |
| Old-Return-Path | <wrar@wrar.name> |
| X-Amavis-Spam-Status | No, score=-7.1 tagged_above=-10000 required=5.3 tests=[BAYES_00=-2, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FOURLA=0.1, LDO_WHITELIST=-5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no |
| MIME-Version | 1.0 |
| Content-Type | text/plain; charset=utf-8 |
| Content-Disposition | inline |
| X-Mailing-List | <debian-python@lists.debian.org> archive/latest/20907 |
| List-ID | <debian-python.lists.debian.org> |
| List-URL | <https://lists.debian.org/debian-python/> |
| List-Archive | https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/ZCQHqph7T4OFG2IJ@durkon.wrar.name |
| Approved | robomod@news.nic.it |
| Lines | 25 |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
| Sender | robomod@news.nic.it |
| X-Original-Date | Wed, 29 Mar 2023 11:40:58 +0200 |
| X-Original-Message-ID | <ZCQHqph7T4OFG2IJ@durkon.wrar.name> |
| X-Original-References | <2dd30b047f9de026dc4751f50786a555@posteo.de> |
| Xref | csiph.com linux.debian.maint.python:14998 |
Show key headers only | View raw
On Wed, Mar 29, 2023 at 07:52:35AM +0000, c.buhtz@posteo.jp wrote: > I assume this topic is not specific to one package but to the whole python > packaging universe. > > There is "backintime" which unittests do write to $HOME. I'm one of the new > upstream maintainers and know that this isn't a good idea. It will take time > to fix this. > About that problem there is a debian bug report nearly 4 years old > > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=940319 > > It tells that this is a problem because writing to HOME during build "is > disabled on Debian auto-builders". > > My question now is why newer version of this package are uploaded then? I > couldn't find that the tests where deactivated. As the software doesn't use a discoverabe build system the package needs to have all build steps explicitly in d/rules, and it just doesn't have the test step there. > Maybe this "disabled on > Debian auto-builders" is outdated and today it is possible to write to HOME > during build? No. The usual solution is AFAIK to set a temporary $HOME inside d/rules though.
Back to linux.debian.maint.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Unittests writing to HOME (backintime) c.buhtz@posteo.jp - 2023-03-29 10:00 +0200
Re: Unittests writing to HOME (backintime) Andrey Rakhmatullin <wrar@wrar.name> - 2023-03-29 11:50 +0200
Re: Unittests writing to HOME (backintime) c.buhtz@posteo.jp - 2023-03-29 12:10 +0200
Re: Unittests writing to HOME (backintime) Andrey Rakhmatullin <wrar@wrar.name> - 2023-03-29 15:10 +0200
Re: Unittests writing to HOME (backintime) buhtz@posteo.de - 2023-03-29 12:30 +0200
Re: Unittests writing to HOME (backintime) Simon McVittie <smcv@debian.org> - 2023-03-29 13:10 +0200
csiph-web