Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.maint.python > #15061
| From | Agathe Porte <gagath@debian.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.maint.python |
| Subject | Re: Should cocotb & pyuvm be under Electronics or Python team ? |
| Date | 2023-07-23 17:40 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <GUJlE-2elU-5@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <GUuPD-24Zn-9@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
Hi Ahmed,
2023-07-23 02:04 CEST, أحمد المحمودي:
> I am currently working on packages for cocotb [1] & pyuvm [2], both
> are Python packages, that are used for verification (simulation) of
> VHDL/*Verilog models, ie. their scope is electronics. Do I am
> wondering whether to package them under Electeonics team or Python
> team.
For choosing the team, it depends on which expertise you want the team
which holds the package to have. For pure Python software, I would say
that the expertise of the Debian Python Team is more useful.
> Also, I've set the Section source control field to 'electronics', yet
> lintian complained that since the binary package names are
> python3-{cocotb/pyuvm}, then the section should be 'python'. Should I
> ignore/override that ? Or should I modifybthe Section field to
> 'python' ?
>From my quick look at cocotb’s documentation [3], it seems to ship at
least one binary in $PATH named `cocotb-config`. Here is how it could be
packaged:
- `cocotb` srcpkg in `electronics` section;
- `python3-cocotb` binpkg in `python` section, containing the library;
- `cocotb` binpkg in `electronics` section, Depends on `python3-cocotb`
and contains the executables.
Same advice would apply for pyuvm, which I did not look at.
> [1] ITP: https://bugs.debian.org/1041288
> [2] ITP: https://bugs.debian.org/1041285
[3] https://docs.cocotb.org/en/stable/quickstart.html
Back to linux.debian.maint.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Should cocotb & pyuvm be under Electronics or Python team ? أحمد المحمودي <aelmahmoudy@users.sourceforge.net> - 2023-07-23 02:10 +0200
Re: Should cocotb & pyuvm be under Electronics or Python team ? Agathe Porte <gagath@debian.org> - 2023-07-23 17:40 +0200
Re: Should cocotb & pyuvm be under Electronics or Python team ? أحمد المحمودي <aelmahmoudy@users.sourceforge.net> - 2023-07-26 01:00 +0200
Re: Should cocotb & pyuvm be under Electronics or Python team ? thomas@goirand.fr - 2023-07-26 05:50 +0200
csiph-web