Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.maint.python > #15024
| From | PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel <frederic-emmanuel.picca@synchrotron-soleil.fr> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.maint.python |
| Subject | Re: installation of script in a dedicated package |
| Date | 2023-06-16 22:50 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <GHoyl-gmXj-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <GHf21-ghff-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <GHnVD-gmKb-13@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
Hello Louis > It seems the only thing this line does is to install /usr/bin/silx. This can be > done 'manually' via > dh_install (see man dh_install). Yes it install only this script for now. I can do it by end. but in thaht case, I need to let python build the script from the entry point and then move it out of the pybuild directory. > I personally tend to prefer having a file like 'debian/python3-silx.install' > instead of having a > 'dh_install' line in 'debian/rules', as it yields a 'cleaner' d/rules file. I agree to disagree :). I like a lot the fact than I can see everythings going one for a package by opening only one file. I am more productive this way. Especially when I work on lot's of packages. cut en past beetween rules files is a lot easyer. the multipliction of the .install files seems to me a waste of time :). les gouts et les couleurs :). Cheers Frederic and thanks for your time.
Back to linux.debian.maint.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
installation of script in a dedicated package PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel <frederic-emmanuel.picca@synchrotron-soleil.fr> - 2023-06-16 12:40 +0200 Re: installation of script in a dedicated package PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel <frederic-emmanuel.picca@synchrotron-soleil.fr> - 2023-06-16 22:50 +0200
csiph-web